Documents

Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.

5,768 results

0.32s

  • Oral argument — Bretta Pollara v. Radiant Logistics, Inc.

    Oral argument · Oral argument · May 2, 2016

    We had agreed with my counsel for Ocean Air beforehand that I would take about five minutes and defer to Ocean Air because they have many more issues that they have to address to the Court, so I'll try … And at some point the Court made that distinction or comment or clarification.

    45 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Unite Here! Local 5 v. NLRB

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 15, 2019

    I don't know local law whether that would be considered a potentially criminal act, but there's that instance. … And a strike fundamentally changes the calculus with respect to Section 7 of the Act and, therefore, with respect to Section 8B1A.

    12 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Thomas Deskins v. City of Bremerton

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 14, 2010

    Deskins to put his hands in the air after he got out of the car, and he told Mr. Deskins to turn away from the officer, and he did, within two to three seconds. … He was going about 50 miles an hour during this time period. So we're talking about over a two-minute time period where Mr. Deskin's did not obey the police officer. And we know that Mr.

    18 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Taylor Sheet Metal, Inc. v. SMART Local No. 16

    Oral argument · Oral argument · May 14, 2019

    In that case, as in this case, the parties entered into a pre-hire agreement under Section 8F of the Act. … That turns the National Labor Relations Act rule on its head.

    36 min of audio
  • Oral argument — State of Washington v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.

    Oral argument · Oral argument · May 4, 2021

    So in that period, anybody who is told to by a police officer to get out of the car is acting under a federal agent? … That is not Greyhound's intention, and I'm trying to clean it up for you, so to speak. All right. So explain to me how it can be, how both things can be.

    39 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Northwest Technical Resources Inc v. Hanford

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 19, 2005

    The reservation is being cleaned up, that they had a contract, and, you know, it goes on and on. … But they're not supposed to compete with the company, which is NTR, after they leave for the period of the non-competition.

    48 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Acmet, Inc. v. The Wet Seal, Inc.

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 8, 2017

    So the order, same page as 633 says, Tony will arrange air shipment for that. … We appreciate the arguments and comments from all three of you. The case just argued is submitted.

    27 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Chad Camou

    Oral argument · Oral argument · May 7, 2013

    There is technology that allows certain advanced phones to be wiped clean from some distance. … How typical on this cheap of a phone is that someone would have the ability to come in and wipe a memory clean? I don't know how cheap this phone was, Your Honor.

    36 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Price

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 8, 2008

    For marijuana, though, I would imagine that nine baggies and 6.2 grams could sustain someone for a fairly lengthy period of time. … You know, the best way to try a case is do it clean and right and fast. And, Your Honor, I believe that was done here.

    37 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Scott Nordstrom v. Charles Ryan

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 11, 2017

    Because we cannot act without jurisdiction at any point. … It's been fully aired. It's now been vetted by the district court, by this court, on two occasions.

    32 min of audio
  • Oral argument — The Bank of New York Mellon v. Star Hill Homeowners Assoc.

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 2, 2023

    very clear and can be resolved just off of documents subject to judicial notice from the bankruptcy court records so that we could preserve judicial resources better rather than having essentially a clean … But the Supreme Court of Nevada wrote in Thunder Properties at page 306, 503p3rd at 306, it takes more than mere notice of an adverse claim to trigger the limitations period.

    21 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Micah Iverson Kelly

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 15, 2017

    And so it's these products that come on the market that say things like plant food or cleaning product as a software human consumption. They're things your people use are easy to identify. … So how many other Kelly cases are out there for this period of time during which a temporary listing was in effect?

    20 min of audio
  • Oral argument — GIANNETTI v. THE BURLINGTON

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 18, 2005

    Looking at the four corners of the complaint, originally five, all we know is that it is asserted that Giannetti Feldman were negligent, period, and that resulted in property damage. … It's out of acts of negligence, and we are an insured under the policy. The burden then shifts.

    25 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Ryan

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 8, 2025

    I don't recall seeing any evidence about seeing other people in the cars running their air conditioning, etc., etc., what you just said. Did I miss that? … So, Your Honor, I think Judge Oreck's comments need to be considered in the overall context in which they were made.

    34 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Leslie Crawford v. City of Bakersfield

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 6, 2019

    And during that period of time, who knows what could have happened during that period of time. No, I understand that. … Dozer was acting at the time.

    30 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Andrew Rutherford v. Jason McKissack

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 6, 2012

    So, it seems that he acted responsibly in that sense. … Good, clean, thoughtful arguments. Thank you. Rutherford v. McKissack and Chin, now submitted for

    37 min of audio
  • Oral argument — 04-35407 ISSC, Inc v. Baugh-Skanska Inc

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 19, 2005

    Judge Lasnik understood the full effect of the unconditional release, and the effect was it released Miller Act claims through November 30, 2002. No Miller Act claim is made for that period. … If you want your job clean, then someone's going to have to redesign these things if someone's going to allow suppliers to spread money over six jobs. But if you, well...

    46 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Quinteros Ramos v. Holder

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 8, 2010

    They can't store all of this stuff forever, so they clean it out every so often. … Did the judge act arbitrarily, irrationally, and contrary to law? And under the circumstances here, the immigration judge did not.

    21 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Rodrigues

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 13, 2003

    Why was Jess Rodrigues never told that the Resolution Trust Corporation, which had initiated his prosecution and was acting as receiver of his savings and loan company, was at the very moment that this … Rodriguez's counsel billed during the overlapping period of time had anything whatsoever to do with Mr. Rodriguez. But beyond that, what Mr.

    23 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Garnett v. Morgan

    Oral argument · Oral argument · May 4, 2009

    And in making that assessment, the district court cited Bruton for the understanding of how egregious the comment was here. There are only two possible interpretations of this comment. … More importantly, in that period of time, the evidence presented was really all about the crime scene, Dan D'Orio's body after it was found, and Dan D'Orio's character.

    32 min of audio

Ask Donna what matters in the record.

She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.