Documents

Oral argument — People v. Quevedo

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 18, 2010

Based upon my reading of what I call the Public Act, as well as People v. … His explanation was that the act died in committee.

Oral argument — In re Geanette S. Whittendorf

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 11, 2010

But that's not necessary, that the court act right then and there. … Prorock was the lead counsel for most of the trial preparation period for the year leading up to this.

Oral argument — Law Office of Trent and Butcher v. Gustafson

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 6, 2019

Not the belief the lien is no longer valid, period, just as to the property that was the subject of the closing. … They don't identify any individual Chicago Title, any deceptive acts.

Oral argument — Donahue v. Workers' Compensation Comm'n

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 29, 2013

Just one more comment on Dr. Bernstein. I think that the Bernstein report is certainly against the manifest weight of the evidence. … He has comments from an FCE that he ignores. He has pictures of the job that he ignores.

Oral argument — Bailie v. Workers' Compensation Comm'n

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 17, 2017

Under what section of the act? HA? There is no specific section of the act. However, there is no question regarding liability for TTV benefits because there is no lost income during that period. … Best to comment on the record. He chose not to do so. The issue of Dr. Best's credibility is a question of facts for the commission.

Oral argument — Bland v. Q-West, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 18, 2026

It's a made-up comment. Yeah. Speaking about the manual. Yes, and we believe that – it was almost – this court's decision was almost rule of the case, you could say. … Evidence of policy is admissible to show what the standard is, to see whether or not the people acted properly or didn't act properly. It determines whether or not they violated their duty.

Oral argument — People v. Kopecky

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 4, 2014

or approaches That door, if there is in fact a screen That's not open all the way He'd be able to smell through the door By contrast, if there is a screen On that door, and so He doesn't have an open air … state acknowledges that In their brief Not much of a standard is required You've got to put forth evidence That there was a search, number one They broke the plan of the door They intruded into the house Period

Oral argument — People v. Nash

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 8, 2018

So my question is, are we to look at this in isolation and just look at this one decision that was made or one act and say, because this one act that this was ineffective or in judging the ineffectiveness … , are we not to look at more than just the act of asking for a recognizance bond?

Oral argument — Harrison v. Addington

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 9, 2011

Period. … Feweger's comment about the Section 9 of the Illinois Personnel Records Review Act, Your Honor, I would submit that that is a complete red herring.

Oral argument — People v. Ali

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 9, 2019

So I think the jury could have concluded that the defendant did act out of necessity in this case, but were dissuaded from that by the prosecutor's comment, telling them that the fact that he invoked his … These, these posts and conversations on Facebook are going back and forth for some period of time. Yet we have no evidence. He, he just tells Reinhardt he's scared.

Oral argument — Gillespie Community Unit School Dist. No. 7 v. Union Pacific Railroad

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 20, 2012

And one of the elements of that requirement is that they certify that provision had been made for the liabilities of the dissolved entity for the period that is the two-year period at that point. … The official draftsman of the Illinois rules commented that this was, in fact, a statute of limitations.

Oral argument — PPG Industries v. Workers' Compensation Commission

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 9, 2014

Shea is looking at this case the wrong way, and I think from the comments I heard from you, you're looking at it the wrong way. I don't think it is an evidentiary issue. … The act is clear. If this person wanted to bring any of those injuries that occurred to her in 1974 or 1978 as a specific injury, then her claim would be barred. The act is clear.

Oral argument — People v. Mooney

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 2, 2018

Finally, I'd like to comment on the Will County State's Attorney's prosecution of this case. … I mean, we've got a state statute that covers acts throughout the state.

Oral argument — Flores v. Illinois Workers' Compensation Comm'n

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 22, 2017

I think the only testimony, Your Honor, if I'm remembering correctly, is her own comments that she had no problems before. … I agree with the court's comments to counsel about disposal of one disposes of the other, et cetera.

Oral argument — Rothrock v. Streator Township High School

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 7, 2011

And I just wanted to comment on that because I don't have a lot to add. I think both sides have fully agreed to this. … And the other comment I wanted to make was the analogy to a saw.

Oral argument — Marriage of Hyman

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 21, 2024

Well, there was a time period after that, wasn't there? I'm not sure... In between the original hearing, the most... Yes. … It intended to say that statutory interest post-judgment is at 9 percent, period. So you get 9 percent, you don't get 8, you don't get 12 or 15.

Oral argument — Brunton v. Kruger

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 5, 2014

And the idea that our citizens can make provisions and wills and trusts for that period, when that comes, is an important public interest. … produced from the lawyers about the willingness of the children to sign that with no comment made about the executor's willingness.

Oral argument — People v. Salem

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 15, 2014

There had been a plea of guilty, but it was within the 30-day period for filing a motion to withdraw the guilty plea. … The appellate defender got their act together and had the same attorney handle both appeals, but I see the appellate prosecutor shared the workload. Well, send your comments to Terry Myrtle.

Oral argument — Taylor v. Japan Brake Industrial Co.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 2, 2025

Reagan, you'll have some opportunity to make comments after Mr. Steffen. Let me ask Justice Hackett if he has any questions. No, thank you. Justice Moore? Okay. Mr. Steffen? Thank you, Your Honor. … Or the act of some unrelated third party.

Oral argument — Crowley v. Watson

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 10, 2016

Had they asked him, he would have said, I didn't do any legal work during that period of time. But the question never came up during the trial until post-trial motions. … Final comment on Gamboa is that this is a claim brought under a statute passed by the legislature.