Documents

Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.

10,000+ results

0.14s

  • Oral argument — United States v. Philip Maccani

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 13, 2022

    Maccani was helping his father, James, clean up after the derecho that hit Cedar Rapids. There was no power. This is about a week after the storm. There was no power in the neighborhood. Mr. … He made comments about having a permit, his rights as an American citizen, et cetera.

    33 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Marisol Perez-Almonte

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 7, 2012

    I mean, everybody knows about air freshener. You know, everybody who goes to a car wash knows about air freshener. … So since we're going to be receiving guidance on that issue in the foreseeable future that would be far more valuable than any comments I might make on it, I suggest that I would focus my comments on the

    31 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Monroe v. Houston Indep Sch Dist

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 9, 2022

    Monroe, from coming on to any HISD facilities for a prescribed period of time. … Do you have any comment on his 28J case? Your Honor, I don't know how the Court feels about 28J practice.

    36 min of audio
  • Oral argument — People v. Heibenthal

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 18, 2024

    And it bears repeating that Officer Wilkie said she was in violation of the Cannabis Control Act. … They can be tended by registered patients or their authorized agent for brief periods. So there's some ambiguity here.

    46 min of audio
  • Oral argument — People v. Scholes

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 12, 2013

    Otherwise the court would be acting as a prosecutor. Absolutely. But then let's move forward. Okay. … And starting with Dublique in 1989 and the Illinois Supreme Court more recently, they started cleaning it up and there's a reason it needs to be cleaned up and this is it.

    27 min of audio
  • Oral argument — In Re i.am.symbolic, llc

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 7, 2017

    Adams because he took a quote and he put periods between it and that's how he made it work. Oh, I see. … In DuPont, the court said that the overlap in the goods, potentially, one was for all-purpose cleaning detergents, and the other was for automobile cleaning detergents.

    28 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Intl Assn of Machinists v. DynCorp International LLC

    Oral argument · Oral argument · May 10, 2016

    I mean, I thought that the discharge really was for purposes of insubordination or for an abrasive comment that was made by the individual in question, an impudent comment that was made by the individual … Because these challenges go to the fundamental question of the arbitrator's power to act, and obviously we're submitting the arbitrator does not have power to act here, they must be considered sufficiently

    44 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Earl v. Boeing

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 5, 2022

    You got clean shirts. You consumed the free shirts. What's the problem? … This is a period, class period, and did he find any variance across dates, and is that a problem?

    59 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Belanger

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 5, 2018

    Isn't that correct, to the wheels comment? Yes, Judge Thompson, I believe you're right. To that specific comment, the co-defendant had objected. Even without the objection, though, Mr. … Is there anything in the record about any contacts he had with his daughter during that period?

    27 min of audio
  • Oral argument — 1-20-0669

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 25, 2021

    I think they're fairly straightforward, and we've said most of what I think we need to say in the briefs, so I'll just comment very briefly on the jurisdictional issue. … The court disagreed and held that the injury caused by predecessor counsel was his failure to bring suit within the limitations period, and the injury caused by successor counsel related to the inability

    34 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Yankee Atomic v. United States

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 4, 2008

    The 91 rate is the one identified—the 91 period— That's adopted by PG&E. The judge in PG&E. … It had to be commented upon. It had to be generated. It had to be signed, all within a matter of weeks or a few months.

    30 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Extra Energy, Incorporated v. DOWCP

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 11, 2025

    He had to clean it up every day. It was lying around on the seat inside his cabin—cab. And they made factual findings on that. … the air inside.

    44 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Puerto Rico v. Franklin Cal. Tax-Free Trust

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 22, 2016

    It itself admits it was a, quote, unquote, State from the period of 1978 to 1984 when there was no definition of State. … That's the question, whether people in a village in Puerto Rico will be able to get clean water.

    60 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Loper Bright Enterprises, Inc. v. Raimondo, Sec. of Comm.

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 17, 2024

    We have no beef with Chevron's Clean Air Act holding, and we could not take issue with its APA holding because it failed to mention that statute. … It was a Clean Air Act case. The court sort of stumbled into these pronouncements about how, as a meta matter, you should go about statutory consideration. It was a mistake.

    76 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Bowers v. Shinseki

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 7, 2014

    Therefore, you have to read this regulation in the full context and you have to assume, this Court must assume, that the Secretary acted within his authority to adopt the position that the government takes … Well, active military, naval, or air service does include 24-B, Your Honor, but you must keep reading on 24-B, and it says, any period of active duty for training during which the individual concerned

    30 min of audio
  • Oral argument — In re Marriage of Barker

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 1, 2014

    of the reason you have not worked for the period of the marriage, it's office school, in this case, fishing. … So perhaps this was a comment on what the judge thought her ability to be.

    36 min of audio
  • Oral argument — National Fed. of the Blind v. DOT

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 10, 2016

    Carrier Access Act, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, or Respondents' prior rulemakings under the Air Carrier Access Act. … And so DOT tries to keep up with that with the Air Carrier Access Act.

    16 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Bona v. Ashcroft

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 8, 2005

    Was there any adjudication, administratively or legally, that he committed an illegal act? No. … There'll be an order for simultaneous briefs, and you'll see it periodically. Do you have any more cases, or are you done? I'm done. Okay. Thank you both.

    14 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Joseph Pakootas v. Teck Cominco Metals, Ltd.

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 6, 2009

    And working this out cooperatively to keep the river clean seems like the delicate balance that the EPA chose. … Is this the reason for, I mean, I'm trying to understand the departure from the more common consent stipulation or agreement, which will have comment and so forth.

    36 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Corbin v. Lockheed Martin

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 10, 2005

    They started off the class period by saying, we're going to make these deliveries in third quarter and fourth quarter 1998. … The defendants go to the Air Force and try to convince the Air Force to take the planes that aren't even ready yet.

    41 min of audio

Ask Donna what matters in the record.

She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.