Documents

Oral argument — United States v. Aaron Vigil

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 2, 2015

Witzow said, no, no, no, I don't want the OxyContin, but this is potential misconduct by an informant or cooperating witness while they're in the act of being a cooperating witness. … And we were clearly prejudiced by that clean cross-examination that we were not able to do here.

Oral argument — Juan Chavira-Munoz v. Merrick Garland

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 1, 2022

Chavez has settled those questions but there's still a there's still some uncertainty in the air about you know what per council I think I understood Judge Fletcher's question to be more Ferreira what … would have done it wouldn't have corrected its own mistake and issued a niche of as type decision it would have did what it did in Mendoza Hernandez so and then finally I think judge Fletcher's earlier comment

Oral argument — TUCKER v. KENNER

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 11, 2007

So you basically have members of the National Conference meeting with Suge Knight to ask him to clean up his lyrics. … Within this six-week period of time, we have Inderscope, the lawyers, death row, following what appears to be very similar complaints.

Oral argument — United States v. Rami Ghanem

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 12, 2021

When there's a conspiracy charged, the government typically proceeds based on the fact that an overt act occurs in the district. The indictment alleged overt acts. … Yunus, if you remember the Yunus case, was flown with air-to-air refueling, but normally people come in, in commercial, in a usual kind of way, and the government doesn't usually forum shop in advance.

Oral argument — United States v. Perry

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 9, 2004

I mean, the issue ripened after the 70-day period elapsed. And Mr. … We told the judge that we thought there was a potential conflict that should be aired, and that's why we had a status conference when Mr. Brooklier was substituting in.

Oral argument — Burch v. Barnhart

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 9, 2004

She is able to care for her own personal needs, cook, clean, and shop. She interacts with her nephew and her boyfriend. She is able to manage her own finances and those of her nephew. … So that the motility or mobility of the claimant is commented on after recognition of her obesity.

Oral argument — Sony Comp Enter Amer v. American Home Assur

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 5, 2007

Explicitly, under Wrongful Act A and Wrongful Act C. That simply cannot be the controlling definition. … So the trademark infringement cause of action under the Lanham Act would be covered.

Oral argument — Juliette Morizur v. Seaworld Parks & Entertainment

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 17, 2022

an improper purpose or acted in bad faith. … Bad smelling air gives you an injury in fact. But you have to actually sniff the air, and it actually has to stink.

Oral argument — Brian Borenstein v. The Animal Foundation

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2020

Yes, the Animal Foundation absolutely had clean title to this animal by operation of statute. … As a reasonable accommodation, the Animal Foundation held this animal for three weeks rather than three days for seven times the required hold period. At that point, Mr.

Oral argument — Cotton v. County of Santa Barb

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 6, 2008

If you read his comments, he says, Counsel, it's just not there. It wasn't there when we argued it below. The record hasn't changed. … What else can you do with someone who has been acting out, has been threatening, and now screams no and turns around?

Oral argument — DELGADILLO v. HICKMAN

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 13, 2004

Your Honor, if this was a completely ineffectual suicide attempt or an act of flingering, I'm not familiar enough with the Lanterman-Peters Short Act, which is, I believe, the name of the act that allows … Maybe I was misunderstanding then because there's also a comment in the report and recommendations that says, I'm trying to find it now.

Oral argument — Mussi v. Fontes

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 2, 2026

So the Supreme Court didn't say, you need to prove that it's certainty that these third parties will act unlawfully. … We have evidence at each stage of the chain that I've talked about repeatedly, but in Clapper, for example, there were clean breaks. On an evidentiary record, there were clean breaks in the chain.

Oral argument — Timothy Nelson v. City of Davis

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 13, 2011

Well, what we have in this case is that the officers intentionally fired upon a group that had been standing there for some period of time. … But there were at least other people conducting acts of violence, and there was this one act right there.

Oral argument — United States v. Curtin

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 3, 2006

There was a period where there were being stories that were underlying. … He incorporated them into his chats and into his acts. And in specific, he, the stories, many of the stories talked about little girls when they get their periods, whether they can get pregnant.

Oral argument — Ward v. Ryan

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 27, 2012

It's not plain air. It's the unreasonable determination. But in both cases, we're supposed to look at the evidence and sense the state court of appeals doesn't articulate the reason. … He acted like a dinosaur, an alligator. He saw daddy put mommy on the hook. He was afraid of Sean. He didn't ever want to see him again. Now, I know you have a four-and-a-half-year-old boy. So do I.

Oral argument — United States v. COOK

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 18, 2005

On the other hand, if he was aiding, abetting, assisting or encouraging the act and somebody else were to sign it on his behalf, then he was not acting as a principal at that point, but he was acting as … I'm picking up on Judge Berzahn's earlier comment.

Oral argument — Verizon California, Inc. v. Peevey

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 12, 2005

West, that was something that was up in the air. The Court noted that there was a mere possibility of a true-up, but as to the question of how does the concession by U.S. … They've now asked the commission to file an additional round of comments. So any pushback in the date that the commission expects a final decision has not been to the commission's delay.

Oral argument — Kathryn Torres v. Kilolo Kijakazi

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 19, 2021

May it please the Court, my name is Margaret Lerkind, on behalf of the Acting Commissioner of Social Security. … The relevant period spans about three years and two months.

Oral argument — Charles Ford v. Verisign, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 8, 2009

When she asked the question, what's the need for expedition, the plaintiffs have said that the answer to that question AT&T gave was, well, there are business reasons, period. … I think that number was pulled out of thin air, Your Honor. There's nothing in the record to support it. What's your thin air number? What should we be looking at?

Oral argument — United States v. Jason Wright

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 12, 2010

And that's not only in the individual comments by the Congressman, but it's also in the Senate report. … And so as the cases I laid out in the supplemental brief say, it's not enough just to kind of throw something up in the air.