Documents

Oral argument — AVEDIAN v. ASHCROFT

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 6, 2004

And then after that, as she did not have a she had a period of not being disturbed. But it's after she left that she has the concerns. … In its decision, the board noted that it had considered petitioner's brief and even commented that it had been a well-reasoned brief.

Oral argument — Korenica v. Barnhart

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 17, 2006

And if you file an appeal even before that period of the Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4, it says if you file an appeal even before that period of time, you're not prejudiced. … And why shouldn't we allow the district court to go ahead and clean up that issue, which is clearly an appropriate thing to do, and then let us review the case?

Oral argument — Aaron Killgore v. Specpro Professional Services

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 13, 2022

Let's not have anybody sign that or Army, Air Force. … So that suggests to me that it's not only the completed act of signing an assessment, but also the prospective act of signing an assessment if the belief is there, the reasonable belief that that may violate

Oral argument — United States v. Juvenile Male

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 4, 2006

And the second concerns the divergent goals between the Sentencing Reform Act and the Juvenile Delinquency Act. … The policy behind the Juvenile Delinquency Act is clear.

Oral argument — Televisa, S. A. de C.V v. DTVLA WC, INC.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 1, 2003

And in clause, in section 22.2.8, after two, three pages of text about the arbitration clause, the parties then threw in a final comment. … That is over the air with rabbit ear antennas. That's all that they had the right to do. But Televisa also had an affiliation with a satellite network.

Oral argument — Rep. of the Marshall Islands v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 15, 2017

The Tucker Act would not give them a cause of action, although they try to cast this as a type of a contract action. In fact, the Tucker Act would decry it. … I can't even think of any cases in which, it is hard to think of cases in which a foreign sovereign has come into court, period, about a treaty or about anything else.

Oral argument — United States v. Rutkowski

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 5, 2003

And if you go through the facts of the case, there was only a short time period where Mr. Murkowski was not with his family. … And he had been clean since then because he was on probation and checked.

Oral argument — So. Oregon Barter v. State of Oregon

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 5, 2003

And the the applicant, when the gathering is over, there are 72 hours to clean up. So they're contemplating time frames for the permittee. … As you can tell, that many people for that long a period of time need a great deal of support services. So this sort of delay is silencing this favored speech.

Oral argument — Sony Computer Entertainment America,Inc. v. American Home Assurance Co.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 5, 2007

Explicitly, under Wrongful Act A and Wrongful Act C, that simply cannot be the controlling definition. … So the trademark infringement cause of action under the Lanham Act would be covered.

Oral argument — Lang Van, Inc. v. VNG Corporation

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 17, 2021

The letter highlights that VNG, in the jurisdictional period, actually entered into contracts with U.S. studios. … VNG might point out, oh, that's outside, per chance, the relevant jurisdictional period. It refers to conduct though, since 2012, we've been negotiating with US studios. We've been improving our act.

Oral argument — Oviedo v. Johnson

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 13, 2004

And that is the rule to which petitioner refers in his reply brief, or Act 9.20. … And so I'm not sure it's quite as clean an error as you would like us to characterize it as.

Oral argument — Nelson Pleitez-Bermudez v. Merrick Garland

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 18, 2022

Because the threats were directed to him, his wife, and his two minor children, they all fled together, a short period of time after the threats were made. … But I don't think we got a clean holding out of the BIA that that was a cognizable group, did we? Or out of our court? I think we only said that, well, even the problem is she can't get out of it.

Oral argument — 05-55192) TRUSTEES OF SO CAL BAKERY v. MIDDLETON

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 14, 2006

Again, this is purely hypothetical, so we're all sort of spinning in the air about this. This never came up, ever. … That's why we ask hypothetical questions and we speculate, as you have commented at least 20 times.

Oral argument — Patel v. City of Anaheim

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 7, 2003

Weiser represented the appellant that cities have a right to regulate hotels and motels and make sure that they're clean and sanitary and don't adversely affect public health and safety. … This is where the whole dispute comes up, that after the 97 denial, there was a Public Records Act request by the Patels. Okay.

Oral argument — Iowa Pork Producers Association v. Rob Bonta

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 9, 2024

there was a cost of compliance issue on prop 12 that was made before that didn't seem to go anywhere yes you're not so you're not making that argument so let me let me clarify just if I can make one comment … And so now we're back here drawing on a clean slate. And you're saying you didn't do anything because you didn't have to and now if you have to, then you want six years.

Oral argument — United States v. Michael Swanson

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 16, 2017

Rosman requires that the intent, as opposed to the affirmative act, in aiding and abetting liability, go to the entire scope of the crime. … Alexander as the bad person and that he's the innocent guy trying to clean everything up. It's the only way I can read them.

Oral argument — United States v. Manraksa

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 8, 2003

Our contention is that the definition of knowingly by departing from the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals model instructions and by allowing the evidence of failure to act to be equivalent to knowingly, … from December of 2000, January of 2001, after that she was basically clean as the snow and was not involved in any of this.

Oral argument — Marlen Reza v. IGT

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 9, 2009

So this is accommodate under which act you're talking about now? This is under the ADA, Your Honor. Under the ADA? ADA. Okay. … calls, and I believe it's on March 16th, talks to the doctor's assistant about the specific things that are in use on the assembly line, which is like a super glue, Loctite glue, and alcohol used for cleaning

Oral argument — Perez-Torres v. Keisler

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 7, 2007

Do you need us to clean this up? Or are you on top of this so that in the event it becomes necessary, you can get the Board or the IJ or somebody to make the correction? … Do you want to comment on that? Sure.

Oral argument — United States v. Gonzalez

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 8, 2007

He got a fantastic stipulation from the government, what I call the criminal history clean bill of health. … And, in fact, Judge Carroll commented on that, even though he ruled against us in this case on that issue.