Documents

Oral argument — People v. Olsson

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 8, 2012

They're cases under the Mental Health and Disabilities Act, correct? That's correct. … Did the judge ever ask him on what basis he was arriving at that conclusion or what was he basing that comment or stipulation on? He did not.

Oral argument — Mitchell v. BNSF Railway Company

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 1, 2013

Just a few short comments. Counsel points out, opened his argument by noting that we never disputed the liability. We never disputed that we were responsible for his injury. … It's statutory under the FELA Act that anything, a failure to act reasonably for your own safety, can be used as a damage-reducing element in a case. It certainly doesn't bar the case.

Oral argument — People v. Schauf

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 7, 2013

The air is human and we are all aware that we all make mistakes. And as a trial attorney, I have to say I do not take fondly to allegations of ineffective assistance of trial counsel. … He didn't have to use that statement to get violent acts of behavior in. Harry should have told him. If Harry told probation, I'm sure Harry told his attorney.

Oral argument — In re: The Commitment of Clark

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 12, 2014

That comment was only, again, directed toward the State's brief, which indicates that the subpoena material was overly broad and was I'm not wondering directly whether or not we have the right to a subpoena … Where in the Act do you find that the respondent has no right to a subpoena? Well, the Act is silent as to the subpoena. Well, then the civil procedure Act.

Oral argument — Conaghan v. City of Harvard

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 28, 2016

And that if a use is discontinued for a period of 12 months, you lose that nonconforming use. … But as I was going through and preparing for this this morning, I looked back at the comments of Judge Caldwell.

Oral argument — Brown-Wright v. East St. Louis District 189

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 9, 2015

Now, with respect to count three, under the Illinois Wage Payment and Collection Act, counsel correctly notes that section two of that act pertinently provides that wages subject to the act must result … Even the comment that was made by counsel during his argument earlier about some other similar policy, that was the date provided was October of 2002. So that came later than employment.

Oral argument — Mercy Crystal Lake Hospital & Medical Center v. Illinois Health Facilities & Services Review Board

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 22, 2014

Here, what's the purpose of that act? … period that could have swayed their vote from, you know, the initial tie to being approved.

Oral argument — Goodwin v. Urbana-Champaign

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 18, 2010

This case arises under the Illinois Human Rights Act. … Some defendants are smart enough that they don't act immediately.

Oral argument — People v. Morger

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 27, 2018

Anything that had a comments section, if you read a news website and there's a comments section below it where you can comment on the article, that's probably a social networking website under the definition … Here, probationers, as Your Honors discussed, was for a set period of time.

Oral argument — In re Marriage of Bowersock

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 17, 2010

We would suggest that there was no proof at all of any such conduct during this period of time or, for that matter, any other period of time that was... … The braces could have been paid at $100 a month over a period of 18 months.

Oral argument — SBC Waste Solutions, Inc. v. Flood

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 18, 2023

Cooney's comments. Count three is petition for valuation of SBC shares for the purpose of the buyout of Crisblood shares pursuant to section 11.7 of the Business Corporation Act. … So from that period, from April 28th to November 7th, there was no order requiring anyone to act. This was not appealable.

Oral argument — People v. Boyce

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 23, 2024

Whereas under the committee comments, the sale is the act that makes the possession known. And then someone can be charged with both possession of a legal object and sale of the same. … So he clearly had possession of the weapon for some period of time prior to discharging it in her direction.

Oral argument — People v. White

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 12, 2016

In fact, she didn't even interpret his comments to her as finish up this sale. … And during that period of time, Mr. Grano went to prison.

Oral argument — In re: the Estate of Knowles

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 14, 2010

So effectively, in that short time period there, he revoked five times different wills, two new ones. … And Judge Rush's comment that, well, it was public record so everybody knew so that's not a big deal.

Oral argument — Marriage of Majewski

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 25, 2023

The date of the period during which the marriage began, the irretrievable breakdown, identification of the property dissipated, the date or period of time during which the dissipation occurred. … I have just one comment Mr Elster can respond to this from the bottle.

Oral argument — Jane Doe-3 v. County Unit District No. 5 Board of Directors

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 16, 2014

There were two victims of White in McLean for acts he committed, felony acts he committed prior to the passing. And there were eight victims in Urbana for felony acts he committed after the passing. … Well, discovery would have been allowed at a minimum for 13 months from the time period this case was returned from the Supreme Court back to the trial court. And so that time period existed.

Oral argument — Fraysure v. Mason

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 20, 2012

There was an F case in Macon County, and the court anticipated there might be a future custody battle, and so it was a very long period of time in getting it docketed. … I think the theory was if the state acted under the juvenile court act that that was the gold standard, and there would not be any further proceedings under the order of protection case.

Oral argument — People v. Henley

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 18, 2010

He never commented that the defendant's testimony was not credible. … He said if it was simply a puff, it could be diminished within a 20-minute period.

Oral argument — George Street Acquisitions, LLC v. Parikh Family Cos.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 7, 2024

So when is he acting on the buyer? When is he acting on the broker? He's acting on both because he's doing everything for both. … And the Penson lender, Ray Clement, commented at trial about how impressed he was with Mr. Barsh's group and their deep pockets.

Oral argument — Standard Mutual Insurance Co. v. Jones

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 24, 2012

And when they discover it, act promptly. That's the essence of the discovery rule. The passage of time does little to increase the problems of proof. … We cite comments by Representative Pedersen in the House where he acknowledged that automobile policies are often written for six months.