Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
264 results
0.06s
Agency decision · Agency decision
, entered lawfully as nonimmigrants and remained here after their period of temporary stay had expired. … The Contracting States shall allow such a refugee a reasonable period within which to seek legal admission into another country.
Executive Office for Immigration ReviewAgency decision · Agency decision
There are no other time requirements set forth in the Act. … Further guidance concerning the meaning of "bona fide parent-child relationship" was provided in an interim rule published for comment by the Service on March 17, 1989.
Executive Office for Immigration ReviewAgency decision · Agency decision
In his decision of September 26, 1951, granting the appellant's application under the Displaced Persons Act, the Assistant Commissioner made the following significant comment concerning the German seizure … Only the second of these merits specific comment.
Executive Office for Immigration ReviewAgency decision · Agency decision
The final regulations were published on January 18, 1977, following receipt and consideration of various comments from interested persons and organizations. … The beneficiary's work experience shows progressively more responsible positions in the field of biochemistry, immunology, and biology over an 11-year period.
Executive Office for Immigration ReviewAgency decision · Agency decision
While the petitioner asserts in her previous appeal brief, received on March 24, 1978, that the beneficiary resided with the adopted parent for the period prescribed by section 101(b)(1)(E) of the Act, … Infanticide by drowning and similar criminal acts are strictly prohibited.
Executive Office for Immigration ReviewAgency decision · Agency decision
To the extent that the very brief comment pertinent to section 240A(d)(1) in the Joint Explanatory Statement of the Committee of Conference on H.R. 2202 sheds light on Congress’s intent to include all … such period.”
Executive Office for Immigration ReviewAgency decision · Agency decision
OsAim: Order: Act of 1952—Section 241(a) (2) [8 U.S.C. 1251 (a) (2) I—Nonimmigrant (crewman)—remained longer. … He was then admitted as a crewman for the period of time his vessel was to remain in port, but in no event to exceed 29 days.
Executive Office for Immigration ReviewCite as 26 I&N Dec. 254 (BIA 2014)
Agency decision · Agency decision
FAIR thus supports a “clean slate” approach similar to that adopted by the Ninth Circuit in Abebe v. … Citing the Attorney General’s decision in Hernandez-Casillas as supporting authority, the Supplementary Information accompanying the section 212(c) regulations at 8 C.F.R. § 1212.3 endorsed as “correct” a commenter
Executive Office for Immigration ReviewAgency decision · Agency decision
Transition Period Custody Rules (“Transition Rules”) expired (the “released after” language). … We commented that the natural sense of the words would seem to point in the direction advanced by the parties, but we found ambiguity in the term “released” because it “is not expressly tied to any other
Executive Office for Immigration ReviewAgency decision · Agency decision
We think it is high time to comment on the procedures involved, for the benefit of both this attorney and others newly embarked on an immigration practice. … Under the exception to 8 CFR 3.1(b), such an order is not appealable only "if the sole ground of appeal is that a greater period of departure time should have been granted." (Emphasis added.)
Executive Office for Immigration ReviewAgency decision · Agency decision
CHARGE: Order: Act of 1952—Section 241(a)(2) [8 U.S.C. 1251(a)(2)1—Entry without inspection (both respondents). … In his oral opinion at the close of the hearing, the special inquiry officer commented on the husband's adverse immigration history and stated that if the husband's case alone were before him, he would
Executive Office for Immigration ReviewAgency decision · Agency decision
In the first instance, the assertion entirely ignores the fact that two continuances were granted, stretching over a period of 2 weeks. … This is a federal criminal offense under section 275 of the Act, 8 U.S.C. 1325. The 32 Interim Decision #271?
Executive Office for Immigration ReviewAgency decision · Agency decision
She was then admitted as a visitor for a temporary period until June 30, 1968. She was thereafter authorized to remain in the United States in that status until December 30, 1968. … The only additional comment required in this respect is that the court itself in the Lee case (p. 1112) stated that it did not and could not consider the correctness of the Service decisions to deny the
Executive Office for Immigration ReviewAgency decision · Agency decision
period ending on May 1, 1986. … No. 682(1), 99th Cons., 2d Sess. 209-13, 219-20, reprinted in 1986 U.S.C.C.A.N. 5649, 5746-49, 5754-56 (comments of Reps. Mazzoli, Lungren, and Sensenbrenner).
Executive Office for Immigration ReviewAgency decision · Agency decision
The Service Representative relies upon comment in the footnote on page six of Matter of 5— and B—C—, Lit. … and 402(a) of the Act).
Executive Office for Immigration ReviewAgency decision · Agency decision
Oct. 4, 1996) (comments of Rep. Smith). … deportation which is filed before, on, or after the date of the enactment of this Act and which has not been adjudicated as of 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the period of continuous
Executive Office for Immigration ReviewAgency decision · Agency decision
For the next 2 months, the applicant slept in the woman’s living room, while performing cooking and cleaning duties. … According to the applicant’s testimony, the FGM practiced by her tribe, the Tchamba-Kunsuntu, is of an extreme type involving cutting the genitalia with knives, extensive bleeding, and a 40-day recovery period
Executive Office for Immigration ReviewAgency decision · Agency decision
even though at the time of the convictions respondent and the sentencing judge were unaware of the recommendation against deportation provisions of section 241(b) (2) of the Act.* CHARGE: Order: Act of … The Supreme Court's comment on Gubbets, supra, indicates that the military court lacked capacity, Costello v.
Executive Office for Immigration ReviewAgency decision · Agency decision
Act, and was properly published. … This period was subsequently extended until July 1, 1073. 37 Fed. Rog. 28273 (December 22, 1972); 37 Fed. Reg. 28286 (December 22, 1972).
Executive Office for Immigration ReviewAgency decision · Agency decision
he had no close family ties in the United States who were dependent upon him for support and he had not been in this country for a period of seven years; nor did ho possess those qualifications on December … The amended language specifically excluded the granting of relief to alien crewman (seaman and airman) and to persons who entered the United States under educational exchange programs: In commenting 1
Executive Office for Immigration Review
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.