Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
1,016 results
0.19s
Oral argument — Trematore Plumbing Heating v. Sheet M Workers Local25
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 4, 2025
That was air HVAC, and he didn't subcontract out. But the CBA was still in effect. … Because we establish greater rights, because we establish full rights under the Act, why would we have fewer rights than we had when we didn't have full rights under the Act?
44 min of audioOral argument — Pierre v. Atty Gen
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 29, 2007
And it has to be cleaned every so often and he has to be fed through a tube, right? Correct. … And there is nobody there who is trained to undertake that kind of feeding or cleaning. Would that be tantamount to torture if they had to neglect his feeding and cleaning? Yes, Your Honor.
43 min of audioOral argument — Marinescu v. Atty Gen
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2009
Without really focusing on any recent improvements and making one factual conclusion, the BIA looks at it and says, well, you know, they have cleaned up their act because they're trying to get into the … His comments, mine doesn't. Mine's non-presidential. Oh, okay. So I'll defer to my colleague on that one. That's fine, Your Honor.
30 min of audioOral argument — Mitchellvs Cityof Philadelphia
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2009
And Beck, Communication Workers versus Beck, which is in a related area, a question under the National Labor Relations Act. … Young's comment, which surprised me, that we've conceded that we made a mistake with regard to the locals' calculations.
31 min of audioOral argument — Litman VCellco Partnership
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 20, 2009
Just wanted to clear the air. What the joint report says are three things that is interesting. … One is the New York Arbitration Act, and the other was the New Jersey Arbitration Act.
32 min of audioOral argument — Scherer Design Group,LLC v. Ahead Engineering LLC
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 7, 2019
You acted deadly, but they acted worse than you did. That is a relevant consideration and equity. Judge Schwartz, in her colloquy with Mr. Kissler, did ask about that. … I supposed to clean it, to go in and clean it out and perhaps pass it on to somebody else. Yes. But you use that computer to get into a Facebook account.
39 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Green
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2009
Why in the world would the prosecutor then comment on this person's reactions? … I mean, what happened was they took him down to the station, they cleaned up- And debriefed. And debriefed.
42 min of audioOral argument — Jesensky v. A-Best Products
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2009
The comments for Section 371 define a neutral place as a place in which both the person who does the act and the person who sustains the bodily harm have an equal right or privilege or absence of a right … Jasensky's father for roughly a four-month period during 1967. Not at shipping port, but at a Babcock & Wilcox steel mill.
40 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Nasir_En Banc
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 24, 2020
Nassir's conviction on plain-air review. Three interrelated concepts compel that conclusion. First, plain-air review requires the defendant to demonstrate the probability of a different result. … Daniels opinion, in which the court was examining the very, very analogous provisions within the Armed Career Criminal Act.
92 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Reyes-Romero
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 3, 2020
The record is quite clear that if the district court entered an order saying, indictment dismissed, period, they had no objection to that. … The Judgment Act said as much. Right. I wasn't suggesting that.
80 min of audioOral argument — Phila Marin Trade v. Comm Internal Revenue
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2009
And when you see Agent Dugan's comments, they're equivocal at best. You could draw inferences that indicate he did get it. … Their whole argument is that the only thing that they want to do is to be able to rely on the comments.
43 min of audioOral argument — MercerOutdoorAdvertising, LLCv. CityofHermitage,et.al
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 17, 2015
So they would be short in period of time for a specific event, as opposed to I think the cases where they were struck down, it was more general. So these are limited, and they're just signs, banners. … Could you comment on the district court's dismissal of the state claims that were dismissed with prejudice? That was wrong, wasn't it? I agree.
39 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Nasir
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 12, 2019
So we have no reason – The comment period is over, right? Well, the commission – I'm not sure. … It may take a long time for the Sentencing Commission to act. There doesn't seem to be any prospect of filling the quorum soon.
33 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Jabree Williams
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 10, 2019
Clearly there was air. Clearly the air is plain. The question then becomes whether or not it affects the defendant's substantial rights. … Why didn't you act?
61 min of audioOral argument — 20-2900_Kars4Kids v. America Can Cars For Kids
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 8, 2021
But your comments to Judge Fuentes was you want treble. … And the other is on the Lanham Act.
91 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Linda Todd
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 5, 2018
Todd had flunked out of drug treatment, couldn't get clean, so everybody talked about drug treatment and addiction. … The second comment about the 24-7 supervision is jail time.
47 min of audioOral argument — Gvmtof VIv.Lewis
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 26, 2010
The period of possession? The period of possession. … That period of time makes this different from Gray and Puello case.
27 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Haggerty
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 16, 2024
You would agree, believe it or not, that such an authority, and I think it's an authority, is the Motion Picture Association, which had input during the notice and comment period, disagrees with you and … That was their statement during the notice and comment period. If anybody has insight and expertise into this area, it would be the Motion Picture Association of America.
37 min of audioOral argument — Edward M. Seamans v. Temple University
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 24, 2013
Act, or the FCRA. … Furthermore, there are industry standards that corroborate that furniture may be fully aware of the importance of a clean date of first delinquency.
33 min of audioOral argument — Svindland v. Nemours Foundation
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2009
McClellan can find it during the recess period, during the rebuttal period. Yes, Your Honor. There's a letter that we submitted, a second letter from Ms. … It was an attempt to use prior bad acts. Did he say keep it out as to negligence, or did he say keep it out as to causation, or did he say both? He said keep it out. The order is silent about that.
73 min of audio
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.