Documents

Oral argument — SUFI Network Services, Inc. v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 4, 2014

The guest could take that and get reimbursed for it as the Air Force instruction applicable to all Air Force commands provided. We cited that instruction in our brief. … its jurisdiction under the Tucker Act.

Oral argument — In Re Wycech

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 9, 2023

is delivered to the mold and it is that added steam or hot air that acts as a binder. … I'd like to just make one clarification in response to the comment about Kaleska's paragraph about the water, there not being too much water, so that granular beads don't stick together, and that's in

Oral argument — ARKEMA v. HONEYWELL

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 5, 2012

Because it's an act of indirect infringement. Ah, but don't you have to show a direct infringement before you can find an act of indirect infringement? … The only actions that actually were alleged are samples in 2009, period.

Oral argument — JACOBS VEHICLE v. PACIFIC DIESEL

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 8, 2013

Do we need at least a sentence that says, no secondary considerations because no nexus, period? No. … If the fourth and bottom doesn't work because the cam doesn't lift or it doesn't act without, Seiko specifically says, you can use the J brake. Now, Halfbrake argues it teaches away. We disagree.

Oral argument — Wi-LAN USA, Inc. v. Ericsson, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 22, 2016

Obviously, inherently, everything we do in life is done in a period of time or over time. … What they're relying upon is one stray comment or a couple of stray comments in a long deposition against ten other comments in the same deposition that are inconsistent with it and ten other statements

Oral argument — Akamai Technologies, Inc. v. Limelight Networks, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 11, 2014

My question is clean slate. Don't worry about the words direction or control. … Since we're dealing in the clean slate world, my answer would be that I read the common law precedents, whether it's the restatement or Prosser or Keaton or Robinson, to say that the acts of a third party

Oral argument — American Floor Consultants v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 9, 2007

And I think where an attorney acting as an attorney. … Attorney-at-Large to comment on the issue of potential termination or a contract matter of the existing contract.

Oral argument — Adams v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 8, 2017

And the third consideration, which may be the most important, is that Major Adams is a United States Air Force graduate. He was an officer in the United States Air Force for 11 years. He was a pilot. … When you say it's discretion, is the consequence of that that that's not litigable through, was it the Military Pay Act or some, under the Tucker Act, that's not litigable, or just it's reviewable but

Oral argument — Reed v. Army

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 7, 2008

My most important comment, and I'm very interested in it, and I hope the government counsel will address this, is this. … Well, we're talking about a seven-month period where there was no back pay, just the period of the indefinite suspension. How much money is involved? Seven months of pay, Your Honor.

Oral argument — Ward v. Air Force

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 6, 2010

Secondly, we contend that the administrative judge acted arbitrarily and capriciously or not in accordance with the law by ignoring the evidence of a causal connection between Mr. … And I don't think that's what the Air Force proved. I think the Air Force proved only that he could have accessed these sites, not that he actually did.

Oral argument — Holland v. MSPB

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 4, 2019

Briefly, Your Honor, I've covered all the comments I was going to make. You've already covered everything that I was going to say. … Clean out your desk. You're out of here. Give us your gun, your creds, and everything else. You're through.

Oral argument — Takeda Pharmaceutical Company v. Sun Pharma Global FZE

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 5, 2017

However, the question is whether or not they must be chemically distinct, which is an additional requirement placed on top of the very clean language that is before the court today. … What they're trying to do is get a complete coating because you may get some air, not bubbles, but you may get some surface tension that creates an incomplete coating.

Oral argument — Morrison v. Navy

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 3, 2017

Do you have any comment on those cases, if you're familiar with them? A few things. First, Your Honor, if we start with the statute where we must, and I'm sorry, let's back up. … So not only was it not acted on, there was no issuance. And whether, in fact, and this really is troubling, it wasn't issued. It was tucked away.

Oral argument — Taylor v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 9, 2020

The Air Force is using this airspace. … And do you have an allegation or a position on whether the Air Force had authority, was acting in an authorized way to tell wind energy what the likely FAA action might be?

Oral argument — Kennedy v. Air Force

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 8, 2009

The Air Force. Ms. Solomon. May it please the Court, Counsel, Arielle Solomon on behalf of the Petitioner, good morning. … In this case, the Air Force was required to defend against the claim for 21 years until the very eve of the hearing.

Oral argument — Nidec Motor Corporation v. Zhongshan Broad Ocean Motor Co

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 8, 2017

Alternatively, the control signals may represent a desired air flow to be produced by the air moving component. And it's those desires that are interpreted from the thermostat. … It emits enough light to-to... for me to make the comments to you that I have and to have the concerns as I've expressed them to you. I understand, Your Honor, and the-the...

Oral argument — HIGH POINT DESIGN v. BUYER'S DIRECT

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 7, 2013

The design evokes this impression through a smooth outer contour of slipper, thin, clean lines that circumnavigate the slipper. … Before I get into my general discussion, I wanted to comment on the trade risk question. I believe Mr.

Oral argument — INTERDIGITAL COMMUNICATIONS v. ITC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 13, 2011

I just want to make one comment on it. If I can ask you a question very briefly on this. The clean construction by the ALJ included this notion of intended to be used. Do you endorse that? … Flynn's comments first. He said that Claim 5 is narrower. He talked about the word signal versus the word code.

Oral argument — ILOR v. Google

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 6, 2008

Probably because the appeal is pending, he felt like it was inappropriate for him to act on it. … Schmidt just said here today, and it's right, our motion for non-infringement put Iowa to its proof, period. It wasn't just about Claim 26.

Oral argument — Re v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 8, 2014

The allegations in the complaint are under Little-Tucker Act for essentially a wrongful exaction theory that he had paid too much to the Army Air Force Exchange Service. … It could be the same five-year withholding period. It's the same impact on them.