Documents

Oral argument — United States v. Michael Stewart

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 5, 2018

And that they knew that they had been unable to obtain any refinancing during that period. So why isn't that a false statement? … And I say that in the sense of as opposed to Shields, which would go to one of Judge Pratt's questions before, I'm not even sure we get to the plain air part of the air because in Shields the omission,

Oral argument — Clevo Co. v. Hecny Transportation, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 9, 2013

You wouldn't be in this fix if you had gotten the agreement to extend the period of the statute of limitations from HTI, right? That's correct. … And in order for commerce, global commerce, to work, seafaring nations have established this framework in the U.S. for going back to the Harder Act, which preceded the Carriage Goods by Sea Act, for over

Oral argument — Bonomi v. Gaddini

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 6, 2006

And she's acting under color of state law because the state gives her power to do what she's doing. That's her job. … Bonomi's speech was that it was just to air a purely private grievance.

Oral argument — Donald Lusnak v. Bank of America

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 7, 2016

And one way to read that, and many commentators have read that, is an underlining, an emphasis to say, hey, we mean it. Right. We mean it. Right. … I mean, that's we know that Dodd-Frank was heavily focused on cleaning up what was happening at large banks just like Bank of America. That's a real stretch.

Oral argument — Vepo Design Corporation v. American Economy Insurance Company

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 23, 2024

So that does seem like that was something up in the air. Well, the thing to keep in mind is, although they owed a total of $6 million to Alliance, they only owed $875,000 on that location. … So I'm here to answer any questions that the panel may have regarding our position or any comments made by counsel.

Oral argument — Evox Productions, LLC v. Verizon Media, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 19, 2022

Paragraph 34 does, in fact, say that there were likes or some activity after the license period. It identifies four time periods – October, February 2017, November 27, and June 2016. Okay. … But I think there's an air of artificiality in thinking about this case as raising those kinds of esoteric issues. And again, I think it is very odd.

Oral argument — April-Lee Williams v. MCImetro Access Transmission S

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 8, 2009

The second issue is whether the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, known as the TCPA, preempts this Washington statute. … Period. There's no opportunities for alternative results. It's clear that an ADAD is an ADAD for purposes of this statute.

Oral argument — Serge Haitayan v. 7-Eleven, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 13, 2019

They worked for long periods of time. This isn't a plumber coming into your house on a one-time basis to fix your sink. … All right, you can make a 30-second comment.

Oral argument — Multicare Health System v. Washington State Nurses Ass'n

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 10, 2018

The arbitrator correctly finds that they haven't been complying with the settlement but then he goes ahead and says you can't have the buddy system period and the district court says well you have to consider … This court in the recent Carpenter's decision found that it was air for the district court to make its own factual findings about the scope of the issues presented to the arbitrators.

Oral argument — James Lyons v. FAA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 14, 2016

Assumed a growth in number of flights over a period of time. They made a wrong assumption, but put that aside. Did assume a growth in the number of flights. … Christy, do you have a comment? I would like to speak to the issue of cumulative impacts.

Oral argument — In re: K. GILMAN

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 29, 2018

The Chandler Act, I'm not sure how it came about. … You're running over the point, though, and it goes to Judge Taylor's comment. Again, you won. Yeah.

Oral argument — Tovar-Reyes v. Blanche

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 20, 2026

In O'Reilly, the timing period was that faro order, which is a different type of administrative order, and that's the actual instrument that orders removal, not the later cat determinations, which for … Garland stating that Loper-Bright doesn't wipe the slate clean and that this court still has to respect its prior precedent.

Oral argument — United States v. Price

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 8, 2008

For marijuana, though, I would imagine that nine baggies and 6.2 grams could sustain someone for a fairly lengthy period of time. … You know, the best way to try a case is do it clean and right and fast. And, Your Honor, I believe that was done here.

Oral argument — State of Oregon v. USDC-ORP

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 14, 2023

They asked no specific questions on either of these two topics Period and so there and then they didn't depose at all her chief of staff for most of the pandemic That in December of 2020 there was a the … If you look at addendum pages 112 113 and 121 We cited Department of Education and we argue that the governor had not acted with an improper motive or outside the scope of normal channels And where was

Oral argument — Rep. of the Marshall Islands v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 15, 2017

The Tucker Act would not give them a cause of action, although they try to cast this as a type of a contract action. In fact, the Tucker Act would decry it. … I can't even think of any cases in which, it is hard to think of cases in which a foreign sovereign has come into court, period, about a treaty or about anything else.

Oral argument — DICKSON v. CHASEMELLON

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 7, 2005

If she had, and that's what she acted on. The problem was that over here was an opinion letter that was never looked at in this process at all. … That finding is a clean finding. It is not infected by reasonableness, which has to do with whether the transfer was rightful or not.

Oral argument — Ovedo-Chavez v. Bondi

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 24, 2025

That was when his briefing schedule was due on November, where there was literally a clean slate in the Ninth Circuit, where the Ninth Circuit said, we do not know what the rule is and we're going to hold … It says here he did not meet his burden of proof for withholding of removal under the act or for CAT.

Oral argument — Tatarinov-Valereveich v. Gonzales

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 6, 2006

I mean, a person goes and gets a green card, and then goes through all the hoops, which are considerable, and the background investigation, and you have to, of course, at the time, you have to have a clean … same question, the reason would have been because this fact pattern is very compelling in the opinion of a third of the panel, because we know, if we want to believe the record, why he committed the acts

Oral argument — Steven Aquino v. Alejandro Mayorkas

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 10, 2021

And the court disagreed and said the 45 days ran from the discrete act, which was when the accommodations were denied. … Well, I mean, the real problem here is that you have a 45-day period. The usual period for a Title VII case is, I think, six months. So it's not unworkable. Everybody else seems to work under it.

Oral argument — AVEDIAN v. ASHCROFT

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 6, 2004

And then after that, as she did not have a she had a period of not being disturbed. But it's after she left that she has the concerns. … In its decision, the board noted that it had considered petitioner's brief and even commented that it had been a well-reasoned brief.