Documents

Oral argument — Aroldo Rodriguez Diaz v. William Barr

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 7, 2021

So I agree with you that the court is really operating on a clean slate when it comes to this question. … And we see that reflected in the Bail Reform Act, where the Supreme Court found that because the Bail Reform Act provides numerous other procedures, including that the burden of proof be held on the government

Oral argument — United States v. PRAMIK

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 15, 2007

It later on noted that the Court had to do periodic reviews and revisions of those guidelines. And then, most importantly, the procedure is, is that, of course, they just propose the guidelines. … And if they're allowed to create crimes or name crimes that are not named in the immigration statute as aggravated felonies, then they're acting as a legislature that can change the maximum punishment

Oral argument — United States v. Alejandro Gonzalez

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 13, 2012

I would like to reserve the rest of my time for public comment. May it please the Court. My name is Aaron Wegner. I represent the United States in this appeal. … And based on the law, this Court can only review those findings for clear air. And the defendant had opportunity to object to the preexisting relationship that we established at the hearing.

Oral argument — Stephen Yagman v. John Brennan

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 9, 2016

What time period were you asking this to cover? For which time period? Well, the time period. I mean, immediately right after 9-11 or from 9-11 until today? … What they were doing was they were doing what they do with Freedom of Information Act requests.

Oral argument — Kattra v, Mukasey

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 11, 2008

In addition, he was eligible for the Life Act, which provides him every available option to adjust his status under the Immigration Naturalization Act. … You don't know about this because you're a nice, new, clean-cut young fellow. I mean, someday this is going to be a black mark on our history. I think it already is.

Oral argument — Ezzard Ellis v. C. Harrison

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 18, 2019

I would suggest drawing it at during the relevant time period of representation. Fair enough. … Ellis, we simply cannot start with the presumption that he acted in Mr. Ellis' best interest. And if we're not presuming that he acted in Mr.

Oral argument — Metal Jeans, Inc. v. Metal Sport, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 11, 2020

district court would make the drawing the inferences against metal genes on summary judgment now the second reason that the district court should be reversed and in our view is that metal sport itself acted … name is Yuval Marcus on behalf of appellee metal sport the discretion in determining basically undisputed facts of the record that there was clear and convincing evidence of appellant metal jeans on clean

Oral argument — Scripps Health v. Nautilus Insurance Company

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2026

But what about here where there seems to be findings by the district court of large-scale failure to deal with a known mold problem over a period of years, and not just simply technical noncompliance, … It was systematic so that it affected all 40 air handling units.

Oral argument — United States v. Abordo

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 6, 2025

Yes, and to go back to that question, because that is me muddying the waters with that early comment that caused your intervention. … You know, it's not exactly a clean record, or at least it's not a pristine period, as the government points out, because client's in prison, then gets out at some point and refuses sex offender treatment

Oral argument — United States v. Michael Davis

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 6, 2020

Also, Judge Paez and I would like to welcome Judge Huck from Florida, sitting by designation, and he sits with us periodically by designation, so we appreciate his service. Pleased to be here. … Isn't it just subject to plain air review? Yes, Your Honor. So it's not waived? Correct, Your Honor.

Oral argument — TIFOW v. MUKASEY

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 17, 2008

If you look at the critical facts here, that in a five-week period, Mr. … And then she goes back and three days later says, you know, the guy's just full of hot air. And that seems very strange.

Oral argument — Sherie Lemire v. CDCR

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 15, 2012

, whether the supervisor participates in another – another's affirmative acts, or the omission to perform the act. … So it's air conditioned to make sure it doesn't get too hot in the summer.

Oral argument — American Raisian v. USDA

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 12, 2003

cause for the debarment by the administrator of any person from any or all of the benefits of the act for a specified period. … All under the 37 Act, not the 46 Act.

Oral argument — Academy of Country Music v. Continental Casualty Company

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 8, 2021

And so I really want to clean these things. I want to clean things out. So I am just going to just send cases back and your complaint says it's over $75,000. … Um, you have to do it in a certain period of time in the times. Well, if the federal district court has no jurisdiction at this point, then what do we order the district court to do that?

Oral argument — Experience Hendrix LLC v. HendrixLicensing.com Ltd

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 7, 2013

I think the problem is, I would characterize the evidence as clean. On the lost profits issue, it's royalty income. … product coming into Washington, the prospective act or that current act.

Oral argument — United States v. Gonzalez

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 8, 2007

He got a fantastic stipulation from the government, what I call the criminal history clean bill of health. … And, in fact, Judge Carroll commented on that, even though he ruled against us in this case on that issue.

Oral argument — Perez-Torres v. Keisler

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 7, 2007

Do you need us to clean this up? Or are you on top of this so that in the event it becomes necessary, you can get the Board or the IJ or somebody to make the correction? … Do you want to comment on that? Sure.

Oral argument — United States v. Jason Wright

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 12, 2010

And that's not only in the individual comments by the Congressman, but it's also in the Senate report. … And so as the cases I laid out in the supplemental brief say, it's not enough just to kind of throw something up in the air.

Oral argument — Evox Productions, LLC v. Verizon Media, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 19, 2022

Paragraph 34 does, in fact, say that there were likes or some activity after the license period. It identifies four time periods – October, February 2017, November 27, and June 2016. Okay. … But I think there's an air of artificiality in thinking about this case as raising those kinds of esoteric issues. And again, I think it is very odd.

Oral argument — Juliette Morizur v. Seaworld Parks & Entertainment

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 17, 2022

an improper purpose or acted in bad faith. … Bad smelling air gives you an injury in fact. But you have to actually sniff the air, and it actually has to stink.