Documents

Oral argument — National Parks & Con v. Kaiser Eagle Mtn.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 6, 2007

We believe it is redressable under both NEPA and under the Park Service's Organic Act and the Desert Protection Act. … , it should promptly make such comments.

Oral argument — Carmen Wannamaker-Amos v. Purem Novi, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 10, 2024

Well, that was not during this period. And in fact, that That was not during what period? During the period I'm talking about right here. Right. … The allegation is that the women had to essentially clean up another male co-worker's mess. That male co-worker called them bitches. Ms.

Oral argument — Concord Air, Inc. v. Malarz

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 6, 2015

My name is Adam Ansari, Counsel for the Appellate, Concord Air, Inc. … Just judgment as to Concord Air. I mean, it's the appellant's opinion that, you know, the judgment on the borrower, appellant doesn't, can't necessarily comment or indicate whether.

Oral argument — People v. Roland

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 12, 2023

Well, we know because the judge's comments wasn't, there was no skepticism regarding whether Petitioner was suicidal two months before. … His testimony was that his act was to fire in the air, which would not be sufficient for an attempted murder as it would be a substantial step, and he testified that he did not intend to kill the officer

Oral argument — Beatrice Lovett v. Cracker Barrel

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 22, 2017

That's what that six-month period reflects. It reflects we're simply trying to run a business. … And so ultimately, you know, I understand Judge King's question about what she said, but all it is is essentially this terrible comment that she's just thrown out of thin air on top of a bunch of demonstrable

Oral argument — Hecate Energy LLC v. FERC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 6, 2024

FERC acted arbitrarily when it approved PJM's $5 million upgrade cost threshold for two reasons. … And that's in the face of industry commenters who said, no, that's just not the case.

Oral argument — In Interest of Tyler N. W.

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 2, 2011

And two acts are mentioned, one kissing on the lips, other touching of the private part. First, not a criminal act. The second, legally insufficient. … The mother says that she was shocked when she found out that the kids cleaned their room. One has to ask, why is the mother shocked when the kids cleaned their room?

Oral argument — In Re: Janet Tingling

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 2, 2021

Tingling, by the way, acting pro se, and that may have been the first mistake, but not a legal one in this case, she accepted their entry into the case, but she did not accept when they entered the case … These stipulated facts did not come out of the air. They weren't sua sponte by the bankruptcy court judge. They were the result of a conference at the pretrial conference between the parties.

Oral argument — Matson Navigation Company v. DOT

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 11, 2023

It's not a statute like the Hobbs Act where there are specific provisions granting original jurisdiction, like in the Clean Water Act. … And so the agency, as a matter of administrative grace, allowed the parties a limited period to comment on the application for the Dakar. And that was in 2016.

Oral argument — People v. Scholes

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 12, 2013

Otherwise the court would be acting as a prosecutor. Absolutely. But then let's move forward. Okay. … And starting with Dublique in 1989 and the Illinois Supreme Court more recently, they started cleaning it up and there's a reason it needs to be cleaned up and this is it.

Oral argument — Willie Thompson v. G. Janda

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 14, 2018

Williams, which suggests that the prosecutor's appeal to the jury to act as the conscience of the community is acceptable, unless it's specifically designed to inflame the jury? … And in fact, the prosecutor said himself, this case is not about cleaning up Oakland. It's about cleaning up a neighborhood. It's not about cleaning up a neighborhood.

Oral argument — Kevin Clanton v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 11, 2019

That's why I say the plain and clear reading of this, and if we didn't have a comment, and the only thing we have is a comment to the model act, this is not a comment to the Illinois statutes themselves … This is a comment to a different act, which has absolutely some different language in it.

Oral argument — Radwill v. Romeo

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 27, 2012

Romeo is acting at some level as an agent of the estate. He's certainly not acting on his own behalf. Well, you know, I know he didn't file any response brief. … Everything is going to be done in the fresh air and the sunshine. The assets are what they are and the law is going to distribute them to whoever is entitled to them.

Oral argument — Atlantic Richfield Company v. NL Industries

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 20, 2024

That consent decree would have required publication in the federal record, it would have required comment, and it would have required EPA to consider those comments, and ultimately, for that settlement … Remediation can include the act of further removal, I assume. When does the title change from removal to remediation?

Oral argument — DIRECTV, INC v. WEBB

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 16, 2006

And in that case, what you were confronting was what statute of limitations meant for the Clean Water Act. … And what you recognized in that case, what the Court recognized, was that the Clean Water Act had a need for a national enforcement regime.

Oral argument — LUCKETT v. ADAMS

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 15, 2006

Well, okay, again, with Judge Kaczynski's comment is, of course, that doesn't have anything to do with ADIPA. Now, maybe your better argument is that Fisher is a post-ADIPA case. It is. … You don't talk about that, but then next she's in court and she sees the same guy now cleaned up for the jury.

Oral argument — George Jarkesy, Jr. v. SEC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 13, 2015

Under the 34 Act? Under the 34 Act, we could bring certain cases administratively. I just can't recall which class of cases. I think broker-dealer, probably. … And then in Tull, the Supreme Court ruled that when they were looking for $22 million, governments looking for $22 million in penalties for Clean Water Act violations because they had multipliers, just

Oral argument — Reyes v. Wenderlich

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 23, 2019

It simply removes air from the gallery. It doesn't cause the heat to circulate around the gallery. … There's no genuine dispute here that they acted with a sufficiently culpable state of mind akin to criminal recklessness.

Oral argument — Brian Woodcock v. Correct Care Solutions LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 27, 2021

Your liver gets progressively more scarred over some period of time, although we cannot predict that period of time for each individual patient. … Just to clean that up, Your Honor, first off, the District Court found and is on review in favor of the Appellees.

Oral argument — Nelson-Ricks Cheese Co., Inc. v. Lakeview Cheese Co., LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 11, 2019

We had a limited license to use that mark for a period until it was terminated in 2014. … Affirmative act, if you're using it.