Documents

Oral argument — Flick v. Southern Illinois Healthcare NFP, etc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 1, 2014

not the offer of the severance agreement was in retaliation for her activities in trying to correct these problems that they were having that were violations of Federal Clinical Laboratory Improvement Act … There was one comment about you need to perfect your people skills. To me, that suggests that they were good, but she needed to perfect them.

Oral argument — 1-18-2512

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 9, 2020

Well, the three-year period here is not from the period of September 3rd, 2014, which is what the trial court found. The three-year period here is when did that dissipation actually occur? … So, your contention is the 60-day period or the 30-day period only had to deal with when it had to be filed. Correct. Once filed within the time period, you could go back three years. Right.

Oral argument — People v. Timpone

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 24, 2011

Let me suggest, it's hard when you read a record, well it's hard as a court reporter preparing a record to determine where you should put the periods. … I've been on the other side of the fence too, so I appreciate your comment.

Oral argument — People v. Drewes

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 23, 2010

Mental Health Confidentiality Act and allowed this stunningly harmful testimony to be presented. And not only that, he commented on it when he sentenced. … There's nothing in the act that says, if an attorney falls asleep at the switch, that that works as a waiver.

Oral argument — People ex rel Donnelly v. City of Spring Valley

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 5, 2018

Secondly, she acted promptly in bringing this within a few months after she took office. … Comments that he made about what the law is is not supported by any case law that he set forth in the brief.

Oral argument — People v. Washington

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 7, 2017

That's between 520 and 780 uncharged acts just from the primary complainant. Her two sisters reiterated her testimony that Washington was committing acts against them over a similar period of time. … Just a few brief comments, Your Honors.

Oral argument — People v. Johnson

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 21, 2015

So there may have well been, at least with one of the counts, a one-act-one-crime problem. … It is that substantially different than actively on the record giving advice that is kind of up in the air.

Oral argument — People v. Gonzales

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 23, 2012

And three, the charges are based on the same act. All three of them are satisfied here. This is all based on the same incident that occurred between Mr. … And the basis of the Williams rule is basically the only way to make the state comply with compulsory charter is to attribute that period to the state.

Oral argument — Wilson v. Workers' Compensation Comm'n

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 18, 2017

They haven't paid the award within this post period of time. I want my penalties. I want my attorney fees. … I guess I want to start out with a couple quick comments that address Mr. Kirkpatrick's arguments.

Oral argument — People v. Chatham

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 12, 2019

So he had this period of time to sort of get to the bottom of this. And there was no cross-examination about this. … Well, whatever the bags show, then the forensic expert could say, but we can't state with a certainty that this meant he fired because there was gunshot residue in the air.

Oral argument — Hess v. Loyd

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 6, 2011

As everybody knows, a conspiracy, one act of one conspiracy is attributable to anybody. … This is the Air Force. All rise. Thank you.

Oral argument — People v. Borizov

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 10, 2019

Well, we're actually kind of in a weird period, right? … And that is not something that the post-conviction petition – excuse me, the Post-Conviction Hearing Act is for.

Oral argument — Seymour v. Collins

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 19, 2014

jump right now into the difference between schedules in the Chapter 7 bankruptcy and the Chapter 13, because there are differences, substantial differences in both of those plans under the Bankruptcy Act … It wasn't just out in the air. The cause of action was pending for about 22 to 25 months, somewhere in there, during the pendency of the bankruptcy, before it was finally discharged.

Oral argument — Parker v. Lawler-Shinn

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 16, 2010

But there's also he also there's also testimony stating that he relied on the plaintiff's version of the facts of the act. … So the judge said, how much air do we have to have before it becomes cumulative and denies I'm going to have a fair trial? And I guess that's your question. I think there's too much.

Oral argument — People v. Denis

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 5, 2018

So the appropriate standard under his issue raised in issue two is a review that I just commented on. … He lived on his own for a period of five years, and he was able to be in control of his own affairs.

Oral argument — Mitchell v. Stonecasters, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 10, 2018

This is a question of him asking a question of stonecasters, which is do you have any sales, period? … And then a little later that day, Modica says, I understand your comments. However, we have, there are really two options and he outlines the options.

Oral argument — Sardiga v. Northern Trust Company

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 22, 2011

But we're also saying that, if I may just comment on that and then continue in my answer, as you know, this was not just a one-time complaint. … A couple comments. The issue that Mr. Jepson brought up, I have four affidavits signed by various clients that Mr. Heinz complained, said that these clients complained about Mr.

Oral argument — People v. Beeler

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 8, 2012

I think as far as the admonitions, this Court can also look to the cases, I cited in my brief, under the Sexually Dangerous Persons Act of Bramlett and Pembroke. … included in the original, apparently it was not included in the original record filed in the appeal, but the trial court does say based on the report that's been submitted, this is direct quote from his comments

Oral argument — Gillum v. Tarochione

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 13, 2014

Well, I think Judge Shiplett was correct to observe that the law is, you know, the agent was under a duty to act in good faith, and my clients were under a duty to act in good faith. … I'm glad you raised that issue, because that was kind of what I was going to transition into next with my comments.

Oral argument — Pekin Insurance Co. v. Roszak/ADC, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 8, 2010

It's a corporate entity that acts through others. Everything it does is actions through other parties. And so to say that it acted through someone else is not to say that it didn't act. … I think that our discussion of illusory was as to their argument that the acts of the agent are always going to be, by definition, the acts of the principal.