Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
1,645 results
0.18s
Agency decision · Agency decision
- 18 contained in the Equal Access to Justice Act and incorporated by reference in sec. 7430(c)(4)(A)(ii)). … As one commentator has recognized in the context of the EAJA, even though that statute “states plainly that the award is to be made to the ‘prevailing party’”, “[t]his is not to say that the party named
United States Tax CourtAgency decision · Agency decision
- 18 contained in the Equal Access to Justice Act and incorporated by reference in sec. 7430(c)(4)(A)(ii)). … As one commentator has recognized in the context of the EAJA, even though that statute “states plainly that the award is to be made to the ‘prevailing party’”, “[t]his is not to say that the party named
United States Tax CourtAgency decision · Agency decision
Generally, an agency relationship is one in which the parties agree that one party is to act on behalf of another. 273, 283 (Okla. 1995). Garrison v. … The Comment to rule 1.16 explains the last clause of the quoted rule above by noting that the attorney may retain papers as a security for a fee only to the extent permitted by law.
United States Tax CourtAgency decision · Agency decision
Internal Revenue Restructuring & Reform Act of 1998, Pub. L. 105-206, sec. 3001(c), 112 Stat. 727. … See discussions by the following well-known commentators: 4 Casner, Estate Planning, sec. 13.5.2, at 87 (5th ed. 1988); Manning et al., Manning on Estate Planning, sec. 2.7, at 2-31 (5th ed. 2001); Covey
United States Tax CourtAgency decision · Agency decision
But until Congress acts, the tribes retain their existing sovereign powers. … A revenue ruling is not a regulation issued after notice and comment, PBS Holdings, Inc. v.
United States Tax CourtAgency decision · Agency decision
The Court of Appeals in Shockley II reversed our decisions entered in accordance with Shockley I, in which we decided the period of limitations issue in favor of petitioners. … However, ICA represented that none of the similarly structured transactions it had facilitated over an 18-year period had been successfully challenged or unwound.
United States Tax CourtAgency decision · Agency decision
But the parties have presented numerous additional matters that may usefully be commented on. 1. … The 3-year limitations period would not expire for almost 35 months. We conclude that, applying section 301.7430- 1(f)(2)(i), Proced. & Admin.
United States Tax CourtAgency decision · Agency decision
Foote later gave his sons stock valued at the maximum allowed without gift tax liability and arranged for his sons to pay the balance of the purchase price over a period of years. Foote and W. … Foote, who acted as petitioner's chief financial officer, testified that he had "no idea" or "not a clue" about petitioner's inventory at cost in 2007. J.
United States Tax CourtAgency decision · Agency decision
See Revenue Act of 1928, ch. 852, sec. 45, 45 Stat. at 806. … Commissioner, 30 B.T.A. 955, 958 (1934) (quoting sec. 22(c) of the 1928 Act).
United States Tax CourtAgency decision · Agency decision
One commentator has suggested that the in-kind exclusion grew out of "the general respect held by Congress and the public for churches," as well as (continued... … There were two properties owned during this period, one from January, 1996 through April, 1998, which was sold in April, 1998, and a second one from April, 1998, through December 31, 1999; and 8.
United States Tax CourtAgency decision · Agency decision
After the statutory trust period ended, allottees got their land "in fee, discharged of said trust and free of all charge or incumbrance whatsoever." … Neither court explained what part of the treaty or caselaw led it to make these comments. We can sort out this issue by going back to Capoeman.
United States Tax CourtAgency decision · Agency decision
As you are aware, the grant of the option money to the partnership is a non-taxable event until such time as either the option is exercised or the option period lapses. In the materials sent by Mr. … Similar comments appeared in the letter concerning FAP. In December 1979, Mr.
United States Tax CourtAgency decision · Agency decision
The period of limitations for making an assessment of petitioner’s 1996 tax liability would have otherwise expired on April 15, 2000. … It is, therefore, not surprising to find that congressional comments during this period focused on potential abuses by agents in the field and not on breaches of confidentiality by a Washington-based bureaucracy
United States Tax CourtAgency decision · Agency decision
The Stranco shareholders acting in concert delegated - 36 its managing powers to Mr. Gulig. 14, The decedent died on October 1994. … Two commentators on the family limited partnership scene add the following with respect to meaning of the "bona fide sale" portion of the bona fide sale exception: Treas. reg. section 20.2036-1 indicates
United States Tax CourtAgency decision · Agency decision
The letter provided petitioner 30 days to submit written comments. He submitted no comments. On September 17, 2018, the WBO issued petitioner a Final Determination denying his claim for an award. … But a slightly different standard applies when we review agency action—here, a whistleblower award determination—under the Administrative Procedure Act. Kasper, 150 T.C. at 14–15.
United States Tax CourtAgency decision · Agency decision
It shall be made by authentic act or by an act under private signature duly acknowledged by the spouses. … or by an act under private signature duly acknowledged by the spouses.”23 ___________________ 21 Comment, Marital Property Agreements--Being Creative with the New Legislation, 43 La.
United States Tax CourtAgency decision · Agency decision
But we pause on a few comments he made. First, Mr. … Commissioner, 142 T.C. 279, 293 (2014) (“The [Pension Protection Act of 2006, Pub. L.
United States Tax CourtAgency decision · Agency decision
period. … Each party in the law today is an equal agent of the partnership, binding it if acting within the scope of his or her authority and if acting for the joint benefit of the family.
United States Tax CourtAgency decision · Agency decision
See Act of Aug. 31, 1967, sec. 1, 81 Stat. at 191-92. … See Act of Aug. 31, 1967, sec. 1, 81 Stat. at 191-92.
United States Tax CourtAgency decision · Agency decision
Code: 1) Establishes an income tax “liability” * * *; 2) Provides that income taxes “have to be paid on the basis of a return” * * *. 3) In addition to the above, I am filing even though the “Privacy Act … This, of course, means that I do not even have to comment further on your ludicrous, unauthorized and extortionary letter, but I will do so anyway - because I can not allow the fraud and deceit it contains
United States Tax Court
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.