Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.14s
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Oct 9, 2025
App. 473 (cleaned up). Of course it did. … Johnson, 515 U.S. 900, 911–12 (1995) (cleaned up).
Amicus Curiae Brief — Territory of Guam, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 1, 2021
These settlements may require various actions to protect human health and the environment under the authority of statutes other than CERCLA, including the Clean Water Act (CWA), the Resource Conservation … and Recovery Act, the Safe Drinking Water Act, or other federal law.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council, Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2002
Only the mode of payment changed, for 14 the goveinment-as-tenant paid rent on a periodic basis for the period of use instead of a single lump sum. … Michelman, Property, Utility and Fairness: Comments on the Ethical Foundations of “Just Compensation” Law, 80 Harv. L. Rev. 1165, 1192 (1967)).
535 U.S. 302Amicus Curiae Brief — Relentless, Inc., et al., Petitioners v. Department of Commerce, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jul 17, 2023
EPA, 576 U.S. 743 (2015), this Court held that a “necessary and appropriate” clause in the Clean Air Act requires an agency to weigh the various, contextsensitive factors that inform sound policy. … Ass’n of Am. 21 Railroads, 575 U.S. at 67 (Thomas, J., concurring in judgment) (cleaned up). B. Chevron violates principles.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Cigna Healthcare of Texas, Inc., Dba Cigna Corp. v. Calad
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2003
Delta Air Lines, Inc., 463 U.S. 85 (1983).............. 4 Stone v. … Delta Air Lines, Inc., 463 U.S. 85, 90 (1983); 29 U.S.C. § 1001(b).
540 U.S. 981Amicus Curiae Brief — Aetna Health Inc. v. Davila
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2004
Delta Air Lines, Inc., 463 U.S. 85 (1983).............. 4 Stone v. Disability Management Services, Inc., 288 ee 2 UNUM Life Insurance Co. of Am. v. … Delta Air Lines, Inc., 463 U.S. 85, 90 (1983); 29 U.S.C. § 1001(b).
542 U.S. 200Amicus Curiae Brief — National Ass'n v. Defenders of Wildlife
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2007
”) where § 402(b) of the Clean Water Act (“CWA”) does not allow EPA to consider effects on ESA-listed species in transferring CWA permitting authority to a State, and where the direct cause of such … The Ninth Circuit found that § 7(a)(2) of the Endangered Species Act (“ESA”) overrides the mandate of Clean Water Act (“CWA”) § 402(b), 33 U.S.C. 1342(b), to “approve” a State’s proposed National Pollutant
551 U.S. 644Amicus Curiae Brief — Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1994
The Air Pirates, 581 F.2d 751 (9th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1132 (1979) .... 2.0.0... 20 Warmer Bros., Inc. v. … l tions on a copyright owner’s rights is fair use, codified at 17 U.S.C. §107, which exempts from the Act’s restric- tions uses of copyrighted material for purposes such as criticism, comment, news
510 U.S. 569Amicus Curiae Brief — Wilkinson v. Confederated Tribes & Bands of the Yakima Indian Nation
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1988
XV § 1... aoe 20 STATUTES: Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 7401-7642 25 Clean Water Act (1972 and 1977 Amendments), 33 iy 25 Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972, 16 U.S.C. 8 ECS Rae te ee 25 I a 25 … *1F.9., the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 7401-7642; 1972 and 1977 Amendments to the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. §§ 1251-1376; the Safe Drinking Water Act, 42 U.S.C. § 300(f)-(j); the Com- prehensive
487 U.S. 1204Amicus Curiae Brief — Decker v. Northwest Environmental Defense Center
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2013
Water Act, Pub. … This Court has interpreted an identically worded prohibition within the Clean Air Act to mean that “any agency action that was reviewable in the courts of appeals cannot be challenged in an enforcement
568 U.S. 1118Amicus Curiae Brief — Borden Ranch Partnership v. United States Army Corps of Engineers
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2002
The Clean Water Act provides the federal authorities with a variety of enforcement options, including the ability to assess civil penalties of up to $25,000 per day for each violation of the Act. 33 … In addition, the courts have held that where a discharge limitation is measured in more than a single day’s period of time, a separate violation occurs on each day involved in the time period covered
536 U.S. 981Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 13, 2023
Air Regul. Grp. v. EPA, 573 U.S. 302, 328 (2014). … That case considered whether the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) had authority to regulate greenhouse emissions of smaller stationary sources under the Clean Air Act, such as shopping centers,
Amicus Curiae Brief — Decker v. Northwest Environmental Defense Center
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2013
Amici have a long-standing interest in the proper interpretation of environmental statutes, such as the Clean Water Act (“CWA”). … Congress could have included in the CWA a “catch-all” provision for “any other final action of the Administrator,” as it did in a similar judicial review provision in the Clean Air Act (“CAA”), 42 U.S.C
568 U.S. 1118Amicus Curiae Brief — Environmental Protection Agency v. Defenders of Wildlife
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2007
BSG EID cccccccecreccecssessensvcnccnsnsees 29 Federal Water Pollution Control Act (“Clean Water Act’), 33 U.S.C. 1251-1387: CWA § 101(6), 33 U.S.C. 125 1(]) ........0000.02ccce00000 10, 27 CWA § … The Ninth Circuit found that § 7(a)(2) of the Endangered Species Act (“ESA”) overrides the mandate of Clean Water Act (“CWA”) § 402(b), 33 U.S.C. 1342(b), to “approve” a State’s proposed National Pollutant
549 U.S. 1105Amicus Curiae Brief — Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook Cty. v. Army Corps of Engineers
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2001
Whether the Army Corps of Engineers’ migra- tory bird rule exceeds the scope of the Clean Water Act. 2. … Whether the migratory bird rule is a reasonable interpretation of the Clean Water Act entitled to deference.
531 U.S. 159Amicus Curiae Brief — American Forest Resource Council, et al., Petitioners v. United States, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 12, 2023
Air Regul. Grp. v. EPA, 573 U.S. 302, 328 (2014). … That case considered whether the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) had authority to regulate greenhouse emissions of smaller stationary sources under the Clean Air Act, such as shopping centers,
Amicus Curiae Brief — Atlantic Richfield Company, Petitioner v. Gregory A. Christian, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 28, 2019
new data submitted during the comment period.” 40 C.F.R. § 300.425(d)(5). … comment period.”
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Oct 25, 2024
NWCCOG also is the designated Regional Water Quality Management Agency pursuant to Section 208 of the federal Clean Water Act. … Travel times have declined by 21 minutes and crash clean-up times by four minutes during periods when the lane is operating.” Fed. Hwy.
Amicus Curiae Brief — General Motors Corp. v. Skelton
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1989
Delaware Valley Citizens’ Council for Clean Air, 483 U.S. 711, 107 S.Ct. 3078 (1987) (Delaware Valley II), the court of appeals recognized that a risk or contingency enhancement, even though not foreclosed … Delaware Valley C itizens’ Council for Clean Air, 483 U.S. 711, 107 S.Ct 3078 (1987) (Delaware Valley 11) ........:sssessrrerrerettieitiete passim Phillips Petroleum Co. v.
493 U.S. 810Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jul 14, 2023
Ct. at 2324 (cleaned up). … Ct. at 2327-29 (cleaned 9 up).
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.