Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.13s
Amicus Curiae Brief — Coinbase, Inc., Petitioner v. Abraham Bielski
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 27, 2023
Teamsters District Council 2, Local 388M U.S. v. Park Place Associates, Ltd. Mastro v. Momt Garcia v. U.S. Bancrop Powell v. AnheuserBusch Inc. Angheloiu v. PeaceHealth Limited v. Indyzen, Inc. … Wireless, LLC Not Applicable 839 F.3d 814 Affirmed Reversed Affirmed 710 Fed.Appx. 753 February 1, 2018 2021 WL 4963246 October 26, 2021 350 Fed.Appx. 108 October 1, 2009 Not Applicable Affirmed 423
Amicus Curiae Brief — General Motors Corp. v. Romein
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1991
Florida, 482 U.S. 423 (1987) ........ 10 Minneapolis Star & Tribune Co. v. Minnesota Comm of Revenue, 460 U.S. 575 (1983) 17 New York Times Co. v. … Florida, 482 U.S. 423 (1987); United States v. Lovett, 328 U.S. 303 (1946).
500 U.S. 915Petition — Dubno v. Mobil Oil Corp.
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1981
Baird, 428 U.S. 132, 96 S.Ct. 2857, 49 Rte URED OUD nc ccc ncccosccmacsecteenens Bray v. U.S., 423 U.S. 73, 96 S.Ct. 307, 46 L.Ed. 2d BEM ence band Seas eesdwsgcavecesarnenss Butler v. … This court stated at 423 U.S. 73-74 that the judicial review provision creating the TECA: was designed to provide speedy resolution of cases brought under the Act and ‘‘to funnel into one court all
452 U.S. 967Opposition Brief — Unser v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1999
New York, 482 U.S. 197 |), Seana 14 Staples v. United States, 511 U.S. 600 (1994) ............. 11, 13 Tenement House Dep’t v. McDevitt, 109 N.E. 8 oo a Le ET TE 7 United States v. … New York, 482 U.S. 197 (1977), this Court held that it does not violate the Due Process Clause to impose on a defendant the burden of persua- sion for a defense that does not negate any element of
528 U.S. 809Federal Register · Notice · Jun 30, 2017
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul Stolz at (202) 482-4474 (Belgium); Stephanie Moore at (202) 482-3692 (Colombia); and George McMahon at (202) 482-1167 (Thailand), AD/CVD Operations, Enforcement and … Compliance, U.S.
82 FR 29828Commerce DepartmentInternational Trade AdministrationPetition — Woodlands Telecommunications Corp. v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1980
Federal Power Commission, 369 U.S. 482 (1962) 17 ill Cases — (Continued) Page Chastain v. AT&T, 401 F. Supp. 151 (D.D.C. 1975) ........ 7 Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. … Ventron Corp., 567 F.2d 701 (7th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 822 (1978); Telex Corp. v. IBM Corp., 510 F.2d 894 (10th Cir. 1975), cert. dismissed, 423 U.S. 802 (1975); Hecht v.
449 U.S. 912Opposition Brief — Levine v. United States District Court
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1986
Bradford, 423 U.S. 147, 149 (1975) (emphasis added). … Hunt, 455 U.S. 478, 482 (1982).
476 U.S. 1158Respondents Brief — Simpson v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 1977
Oregon, 366 U.S. 643 _ 21 United States v. Ramirez, 482 F.2d 807, certiorari denied sub nom. Gomez v. United States, 414 U.S. 1070 26 United States v. Sudduth, 457 F.2d 1198 26 United States v. … United States, 423 U.S. 212, 217). 12 Section 924(c) on its face contains little hint of ambiguity.
430 U.S. 964Amicus Brief — Firefighters v. Stotts
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Brief · 1984
Weber, 433 U.S. 193 (1979). ....... 9. 10 Weinstein v. Bradford, 423 U.S. 147 (1975)... 7 Zipes v. Transworld Airlines, 455 U.S. 385 (1982) 000000000000... 16 STATUTES SEE ae eT 2 EE 5 42USC. … Bradford, 423 U.S. 147, 149 (1975), the Court recognized that if a case is “capable of repetition, yet evading review" it may not be moot.
467 U.S. 561Petition — White v. Finkbeiner
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1981
Rodriguez-Gastelum, 569 F. 2d 482 (9th Cir., 1978) (en banc). . 2. 2 2 2 se ee ee ee ee we we we ee es 13 U.S. ex rel. Sanders v. Rowe, 460 F. Supp. 1128 (N.D. … Mosley, 423 U.S. 94, 104 n. 10. Mr. Justice White further discussed the procedure to be followed when an attorney is requested, in his, concurring Opinion in Mosley.
451 U.S. 1013Opposition Brief — Ilic v. Liquid Air Corp.
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1995
Pittsburg Steamship Co., 340 U.S. 498, 503, 71 S. Ct. 453, 456, 95 L. Ed. 479, 482 (1951). Factual questions are for the trial court to resolve. J m Vv. 377 US. 426, 431, 84 S. … Ed. 2d 423, 427 (1964). See also Ferguson v. Moore-McCormick Lines, Inc., 352 U.S. 521, 528, 77 S. Ct. 459, 461, 1 L.
514 U.S. 1064Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2010
Corbin, 423 F.2d 821 (10th Cir. Dosa iach nieve sais aes nods do eusouie benaade cae ta sea 6 United States v. Gen. Motors Corp., 323 U.S. … County of Los Angeles, 482 U.S. 304, 316 (1987). The level of compensation is generally determined by “the fair market value of the property on the date it is appropriated.”
561 U.S. 1006Standards for Business Practices of Interstate Natural Gas Pipelines; Notice of Compliance Filing
Federal Register · Notice · Jul 14, 2005
In the matter of: RP05-417-000, RP05-479-000, RP05-465-000, RP05-464-000, RP05-471-000, RP05-482-000, RP05-411-000, RP05-419-000, RP05-457-000, RP05-436-000, RP05-404-000, RP05-424-000, RP05-446-000, RP05 … -488-000, RP05-459-000, RP05-433-000, RP05-434-000, RP05-435-000, RP05-495-000, RP05-426-000, RP05-437-000, RP05-472-000, RP05-423-000, RP05-416-000, RP05-407-000, RP05-460-000, RP05-445-000, RP05-442-
70 FR 40696Energy DepartmentFederal Energy Regulatory CommissionJoint Appendix — Kindred Nursing Ctrs. Ltd. P'ship v. Clark, 137 S. Ct. 1421 (2017) (No. 16-32)
Supreme Court brief · Joint Appendix · 2017
Thomas, 482 U.S. 483, 492 fn 9 (1987) (citing Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co., 388 U.S. 395 (1967) and Southland Corp. v. Keating, 465 U.S. 1 (1984)(emphasis original)). … Thomas, 482 U.S. 483, 492 fn 9 (1987) (citing Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co., 388 U.S. 395 (1967) and Southland Corp. v. Keating, 465 U.S. 1 (1984)(emphasis original)).
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Bailey v. Noot
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1992
Indiana, 406 U.S. 715 (1972) .. 17 Lindsey v. Washington, 301 U.S. 397 (1937) ............ 10, 12 Miller v. Florida, 482 U.S. 423 (1987) 12 Prater v. … Florida, 482 U.S. 423 (1987); Lindsey v. Washington, 301 U.S. at 401-02.
503 U.S. 952Agency decision · Agency decision
No. 99-426, at 423-426 (1985), 1986-3 C.B. (Vol. 2) 1, 423-426. … On July 10, 2014, respondent amended the answer to exclude royalty amounts paid by MPROC for non-U.S. sales, which meant that the notice adjustments for section 482 were understated by $51,650,809 for
United States Tax CourtRespondents Brief — Crosby v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 1993
Zavala, 666 P.2d 456 (Ariz. 1983) ........ 22 1975), certs. denied, 423 U.S. 1088 and 424 U.S. Tacon V. … Peterson, 524 F.2d 167 (4th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1088 (1976).
506 U.S. 255Petition for Rehearing — Arturo Fernando Shaw Gutierrez, Petitioner v. California
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Rehearing · Oct 26, 2020
Powell, 428 U.S. 465, 481-482 (1976) (constitution requires “an opportunity for full and fair litigation of a Fourth Amendment claim”). … Bartlett (2019) 587 U.S.__ ; Houston v. Hill, (1987) 482 U.S. 451; Perry v. Sindermann, (1972) 408 U.S. 593; Johnson v. Avery, (1969) 393 U.S. 483; United States v.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Melissa Pfeiffer, Petitioner v. Massachusetts
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Sep 5, 2019
Pfeiffer, 482 Mass. 110 (2019) 19a 121 N.E.3d 1130 All itations 482 Mass. 110, 121 N.E.3d 1130 End of Document © 2019 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works. … Ohio, 360 U.S. 423 (1959). And yet, this Court punished Ms.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Jerome Curry, Petitioner v. Terri Wallace, Warden, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Sep 10, 2025
Davis, 580 U.S. 100. 115-17 (2017). … Weber, 423 U.S. 261, 270-71 (1976). The Court is charged with making a de novo determination of any portion of the Report of the Magistrate Judge to which a specific objection is made.
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.