Documents

Oral argument — Murphy v. Kinnaly Flaherty Krentz Loran Hodge & Masur, P.C.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 11, 2019

Period. Full stop. The executor's claim that air safety bars only pre and allows post is just made up. That conclusion cannot be reasonably drawn from the Supreme Court opinion. … Listen, with respect to counsel's comment about extrinsic evidence, you acknowledge what air safety says, correct? I do. Justice Heupel, I do acknowledge it.

Oral argument — Sackett v. EPA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 9, 2012

Mike and Chantelle Sackett are here today because four years ago the Environmental Protection Agency issued against them a compliance order charging them with violations of the Clean Water Act, requiring … That is, the question whether the Clean Water Act applied to this tract could have been teed up for a court in either of two ways. If it doesn't, you're on the final part.

Oral argument — United States v. James Honesty

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 10, 2026

Those are improper statements and comments when the government agrees to cap its allocution. … it apply in this case and that's at 729 the defendant argued the prosecutor had essentially effectively effectively agree the court should apply an enhancement this court rejected it said not only not clean

Oral argument — Friends of Animals v. Sally Jewell

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 16, 2016

For example, if you look at this circuit's decision in Ethel Corporation under the Clean Air Act, there was monitoring and reporting requirements. … You can do that by saying the Secretary still hasn't acted. Yes, Your Honor, we can tell our members that the Secretary hasn't acted, but we can't update them on the status of the species. Why not?

Oral argument — United States v. Amador-Beltran

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 7, 2008

You have to know, you have to, prosecutors have to show the defendant was aware of his acts. Yes, but the act. … Assume we're writing on a clean slate.

Oral argument — Kevin Clanton v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 11, 2019

That's why I say the plain and clear reading of this, and if we didn't have a comment, and the only thing we have is a comment to the model act, this is not a comment to the Illinois statutes themselves … This is a comment to a different act, which has absolutely some different language in it.

Oral argument — Harvey Morton v. John Yonkers

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 4, 2014

So, you know, you just can't use this, leave this up in the air for the sake of this litigation. It makes no sense. … because that class of parties can ratify or otherwise approve of the act.

Oral argument — Peter Waldburger v. CTS Corporation

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 30, 2013

Both are limitations periods that have the same effect of barring a plaintiff's claim before he has an opportunity to discover his harm. This Court is not riding on a clean slate in this case. … Furthermore, a longer limitations period gives defendants more incentive to clean up their contamination.

Oral argument — In re Marriage of Stone

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 29, 2011

The trial court aired in three. There never was any adjudication of disability in Michael's case. … Stone over a period of time.

Oral argument — Digital Realty Trust, Inc. v. Somers

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 28, 2017

I'd like to talk about that notice-and-comment period for just a moment. It seems to me you've got this plain language problem, so you've got to generate an ambiguity. … But here, the notice-and-comment period provided notice that we're going to issue rulemaking with respect to whistleblowers who report to the Commission.

Oral argument — Paul Galvez v. Cardinal Health 101, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 15, 2010

And they said, well, nobody else who cleans does that. That's not this job. It's to clean the warehouse, not just to clean a corner. … There were numerous accommodations provided to him over a three and a half year period, including numerous medical leaves of absence, numerous short-term periods of letting him work a reduced work schedule

Oral argument — United States v. Abbott

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 15, 2024

The boats that are, that can float in this water can also, for brief periods, go over land because of the way they're constructed. … There are, for example, in the Clean Water Act, which gives additional authority and talks about boundary waters, that study is I think it's 33 U.S.C. 1370 that I could have at home.

Oral argument — People v. Acosta

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 15, 2026

It wasn't an inherently dangerous act. He didn't shoot a gun in the air. You know, he didn't – the state's cases are distinguishable on that point. … I have a question or a comment that I'd like you to respond to.

Oral argument — Miller v. Dricks

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 18, 2021

If you would act quickly, not in the first hit, maybe not even the second hit. But by the time the third hit in the back of the head with the thud, remember him. … Um, the sirens air going off, and so it is both hard to see and hard to hear.

Oral argument — Vuyanich v. Smithton Borough

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 16, 2020

So the order was clean up the property. Don't start for 20 days. And then the cleanup began. And over the period of the next 30 to 60 days, the cleanup finished. … They wanted the property cleaned up.

Oral argument — OCEAN DUKE CORPORATION v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 8, 2012

So why not just go back and clean them all up? Or why not allow the motions for reconsideration once they come in and reduce the amount of the bond? … As far as the last comment, whether it's discretion under the agency to apply NFI, we believe it's an abuse of discretion standard, and that's what we want the Court to look at.

Oral argument — Jesse Meyer v. Megan Brennan

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 24, 2022

And, and I appreciate the comment. Could I, could I ask you to move on in particular to the hostile environment claim? … That is also a specific offer given to her in her modified job offer that she performed periodic cleaning of the storage room and organized supplies because she was unable to perform letter carrier duties

Oral argument — Caburnay v. Norwegian American Hospital

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 6, 2011

We first have several, the lapse of a lengthy period of time in which Dr. … It's also used as a premises liability case where the premises become defective through the act of the owner. Here we have a mat, arguably defective, put down by the hospital.

Oral argument — United Pet Supply v. Animal Care Trust

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 8, 2013

process of cleaning the kennels. … It's not the same as continuous cleaning.

Oral argument — Davina Ricketts v. Wake County Public School System

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 25, 2024

What's the deal with this three-day campaign period? … Or even comments about, this is not in this case, but even comments about her hair. And just in general, not the person here I'm talking about, general comments like that.