Documents

Oral argument — Adam Backhaut v. Apple Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 15, 2017

This Court in Conop construed definitively this in-transmission requirement and said the wiretap act applies to the acquisition of a communication while it's in the air at the speed of light. … And, again, so they aren't able to locate an actual transmission where the message is kind of plucked out of the air and acquired by someone.

Oral argument — United States v. Richard

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 13, 2007

The judge's comments are 281 of the record. And I don't think I need to repeat those. … Doesn't our recent panel decision that we asked you to comment say just that?

Oral argument — Martin v. Arrow Electronics

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 4, 2009

Adario's report and saw that comment that they're now relying on, they didn't ask to continue the trial. They didn't ask to reopen discovery. … Adario about that note, and he felt like he needed to come clean, if you want to use that terminology, to the jury and explain what was going on.

Oral argument — United States v. Norman Garcia

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 15, 2013

Because the defense started with the lesser-included instruction, I'll start my comments there as well. First of all, with due respect to counsel, I believe that he misstates the holding in Keeble. … The defense argued that he acted accidentally in the act that comprised the assault in this case. Even the lesser-included requires an intentional act.

Oral argument — WOOD v. DOLLAR RENT-A-CAR

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 11, 2005

There are ageist comments from Sousa, his supervisor, ageist comments from Pax and the President, ageist comments. … All that we ask as the appellant is for a reversal and a remand so we could have the full airing. Let me ask you this.

Oral argument — John Vernile v. Pacifica Foundation, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 14, 2023

Vernile was hired by Pacifica as an interim executive director for a six-month period. … Six weeks after he became the ED, he took the New York station, WBAI, off the air without a vote of the executive board.

Oral argument — Lee v. GNC Franchising, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 9, 2003

I understand you're sort of going, that's some of the theories under the Copperwell Doctrine and the Robinson-Patman and the Sherman Act that they can't conspire. … And I think under the theory that the parties are going to have a clean slate in going forward and dealing with one another.

Oral argument — Martin Kipp v. Ron Davis

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 28, 2019

There's no reason to clean it up. He, in essence, said he commented that he killed these victims and that Satan was licking them up and laughing at them. … They're really distinct, and, and this, this, uh, Satan wasn't pulled out of thin air and wasn't pulled out of, um, the Bible or brought up by, by a juror.

Oral argument — Aime Gressett v. CAWCD

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 4, 2017

And it was formed as a district to satisfy the requirements of federal law, and that is the Colorado River Basin Project Act. The Basin Project Act required that... … It goes on to say that the Commonwealth Port Authority, quote, acts for the state.

Oral argument — Edward Breiner v. Nevada Department of Correctio

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 11, 2010

And I believe some may have come over, but basically they cleaned house. And they certainly cleaned house with the management positions, including the lieutenant and on up. … And if you're fortunate enough to have a fourth, they can act as a reserve that will help out for things such as leave and days off.

Oral argument — Security Alarm Financing v. Alarm Protection Technology

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 12, 2018

The Alaska Trade Secrets Act, as to which there was no evidence of a loss resulting from an alleged misappropriation of trade secrets. And third, the Lanham Act requires causation. … be high periods of cancellation.

Oral argument — Bradley Cooper v. Thoratec Corp.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 14, 2017

And when we clean that from their opening brief at pages 18 to 19, note 2, that's where they identify which of the statements they're still challenging, and they list some statements they are no longer … This is an extraordinarily complex medical diagnosis that has to be made for each instance, and then the studies also show extensive statistical analysis to arrive at the numbers that the plaintiffs are acting

Oral argument — United States v. Lewis

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 16, 2003

Lewis's Speedy Trial Act motion to dismiss went back and said that that period was specifically covered by the exclusion h1f because that exempts any period of delay resulting from any pretrial motion … of January more than that more than the period of the Speedy Trial Act if that if that exclusion is incorrect you're over the time limit I think that's right I think that's right yes well let's say let's

Oral argument — United States v. Leung

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 30, 2004

And I agree that if we were, if this Court were riding on a clean slate, it's clear from your dissent in Campos that you would find differently than the state of the lie is. … Your Honor, just a few comments about Murillo. I don't agree with counsel's interpretation of Murillo. I don't think that it expanded the law or that it added anything new.

Oral argument — People of the State of California v. CaremarkPCS Health LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 11, 2024

During the relevant period, all insulin rebate negotiations that Caremark conducted for FIBA plans were also for non FIBA plans too. … And I see that we've gotten into our reserve time, so I'll reserve further comment for my colleague. Good morning, and may it please the Court.

Oral argument — United States v. Nisely

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 9, 2006

They made extensive comments to the district court judge challenging Juror Armstrong before the jury had been sworn. … I believe, Your Honor, that a motion to modify a condition of supervision would probably lie during the period of supervision.

Oral argument — Mario Rodas v. William Barr

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 13, 2020

CNN journalist goes to Iran, interviews a Washington Post journalist who's stationed there, asks him some politically sensitive questions, airs that report. … They're executed or they're tortured, but the police officer who actually committed the act is all free, scot-free.

Oral argument — Does 1-16 v. USDHS

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 15, 2021

I understand we don't want to curb ICE's ability to act on a national emergency and pandemic. I think that also brings us to why the notice and comment procedures wouldn't apply here. … If you would agree, yes, Your Honor, because the proper procedure would be to vacate it or send it back for comment, our new, I guess, notice and comment procedures.

Oral argument — EEOC v. The Boeing Company

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 6, 2009

Carlton made, quote, a lot of negative comments about women that were, quote, repetitious over the years. … And ultimately, in response to this, Your Honor, of course, is that she had asked to be moved during that period of time. She wanted to be moved.

Oral argument — Crown Paper v. PriceWaterHouseCooper

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 25, 2006

With your comment, Your Honor, Mr. Lower will address the issues of repeated appeals to the extent the Court has any questions. Other than that, I will be here talking to the appellees. And you are? … They provided clean audit opinions, 1996 through 1999. So what we have here are claims which are analogous to the churning claims in the Wagner case.