Documents

Oral argument — Illinois Cement v. Workers' Compensation Commission

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 12, 2011

Is that not a significant period of time? That is a significant period of time, but that, number one, that would be a significant period of time if an expert testified that that was his loss. Dr. … And the Occupational Disease Act, is it within a period of time after his last day of employment?

Oral argument — People v. Sweet

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 25, 2017

And I think that principle, even though they were dealing with the Sexually Endangered Persons Act, is equally applicable here. … I'm not pulling it out of thin air. I'm sure we can rely on case law from this state for that principle. Thank you, counsel. Thank you both. The court takes this under advisement.

Oral argument — People v. Legoo

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 4, 2019

He was charged under a misdemeanor, Section 9.4-1B of the Act. … I don't need to read them as they appear in the comments.

Oral argument — People v. Maples

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 13, 2018

time period actually received five tattoos from the defendant. … Now, your comment relies on Nash with respect to knowledge of the age, and how do you distinguish that case? Nash. I'm sorry to say that people just can't recall Nash's point in time.

Oral argument — People v. Dillon

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 18, 2024

A time period was not an act. … But here, there is no outside research made by the trial judge, as well as there is no certain comments as to the defendant's limited mental capacity.

Oral argument — People v. Reed

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 4, 2025

While Cobalt involved a single continuous filming of two minor victims, the recordings in this case would begin when motion was detected, and then they would stop after a period of time if no motion was … So there were intervening acts. It wasn't a single continuous filming that was uninterrupted. There were periods of time that weren't recorded because there was no motion in the bathroom.

Oral argument — St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. Hobbs

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 19, 2014

Now, doesn't this mean that the injury caused by malicious prosecution must occur during the policy period, not that the tort must be completed during the policy period? … policy period?

Oral argument — People v. Lewis

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 4, 2017

That was objected to, and that objection was sustained, but there was no period of instruction. Then on page 83, to address the question you asked Mr. … But for the reason stated in the brief, we believe it was plain air. Time is up, but I'm anxious about this whole business to identify the distinction that Mr.

Oral argument — Kitchen v. Volkman

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 13, 2023

I would like to comment on five areas of error involving the law where we don't believe it was followed. And I'll finish with a discussion on damages. … Linda's belief she was not acting was irrelevant.

Oral argument — People v. Kelley

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 1, 2012

Quackenbush's confession on these other acts which they said they relied upon, would there be an argument? Your Honor, that would be a proper way to argue the testimony. … So the response was to a particularized argument about how the sexual assault history was limited to a particular period in the context of Dr.

Oral argument — People v. Brownson

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 25, 2018

As a final alternative in issue eight, based on one act, one crime grounds, he asks Your Honors to vacate three of the criminal sexual assault convictions for which the judge imposed no sentence. … If he was living in a home that had no heat and no air conditioning, or if he was living in the home that Diamond said he was living in and all three girls testified that he was living in.

Oral argument — People v. 2009 Chevrolet 2500

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 21, 2016

One was under the Money Laundering Act, and one was under the Auto Theft Conspiracy Act, or the act that alleged the auto theft criminal conspiracy. … Other than that, I have no other comments. Well, let me ask you a question.

Oral argument — Spencer v. Di Cola

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 3, 2014

Now, I acknowledge that there's been an extended period of time subsequently in which there has been no corporate co-trustee acting. … You made a comment about time, so I'm not sure where we're at. If you need a couple more, don't worry about it. I said go on. Okay. Thank you.

Oral argument — Pryor v. United Equitable Insurance

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 17, 2011

So you're saying that that period, you did not have to wait for that period during which the court could have modified the arbitration award? Yes. … Levinson's case, there was a comment that there was argument during the period about the exchange of releases, the FEIN number, and a refusal by Mr. Levinson to do that.

Oral argument — People v. Miller

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 28, 2019

And in that case, there was uncorroborated double hearsay of prior criminal acts. … And he actually was allowed to be on a home monitor during that time period instead of being detained, even though it was a Class X felony, to get treatment presumably for his Crohn's disease, which was

Oral argument — Erickson v. County of LaSalle

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 22, 2012

She acted in that employment on, it was May 15th of 2006. And that was by resolution, her employment started by resolution, that was for a two and a half year term. … And Judge Heddle, by interpreting this, and I think his comments were that it's how the county does business.

Oral argument — Souza v. City of West Chicago

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 27, 2021

And you get that from the legislative history and the legislative comments, correct? Yes, I do. … Acosta, and that is I'd like you to just comment as briefly as possible on a comment that just now in a special concurrence to Palm, where he said that home rule municipalities may choose to govern locally

Oral argument — In re the Marriage of Karafotas

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 18, 2010

And three steps happened in that period of time, all after the divorce. … You know, it's a piece of it, but it still airs the same addresses and the same land.

Oral argument — Uhlich Children's Advantage Network v. National Union Fire Insurance Company

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 16, 2009

And, again, it's not when the wrongful act occurs. It's when a claim is made for the wrongful act. … I believe that the wrongful act had to have been, had to have resulted in a claim of which the insured was aware within the policy period. Okay.

Oral argument — City of East Peoria, Illinois v. Property Tax Appeal Board

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 5, 2018

It did not act as if it had discretion. … It said that they were going to act on attachment A.