Documents

Oral argument — Pedersen v. Akona

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 8, 2007

I represent the Defendants Clean Products, formerly known as Acona, and Stephen Hodges. … Oh, Your Honor, can I just comment real quickly on one question that you asked Mr. Martin? Okay.

Oral argument — Brown v. The Brita Products Company

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 5, 2026

We're not going to say, hey, at the end of the day, you're going to have safe, clean, free of everything tap water. … It alleges that arsenic is, quote, naturally found in the earth's crust and is widely distributed throughout the environment in the air, water, and land.

Oral argument — United States v. Darnell Pearson

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 10, 2022

So how can how can we say that the air was clear and obvious if there was no objection to the statement made by the resentencing report? … How is it we expect the district court to have figured it out itself without any comment from the people who should know even better?

Oral argument — In re: Mountain Air Enterprises, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 21, 2020

And for each time period in the case, as it grew and went through its phases, I explained how the time had been spent on the illegality defense and where it came from. … It violated the Subdivision Map Act under both California and Nevada law. That was it. The fact was stipulated to. So I thought, based upon my analysis of my 30 pages, I went through them again.

Oral argument — Citizens Opposing Pollution v. Exxon Mobil Coal USA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 1, 2009

It says preventing pollution, preventing land pollution, water pollution, air pollution. It talks about striking a balance between environmental protection and agricultural productivity. … Lo and behold, it is a permanent impoundment of something other than clean water.

Oral argument — United States v. Ray Caldwell

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 2, 2015

Even if that went into the groundwater, the Clean Water Act does not regulate groundwater. … If you were to discharge that into a water of the United States, you would need a permit and it would be a violation of the Clean Water Act if you didn't have one.

Oral argument — Sierra Club and Peoria Familis Against Toxic Waste v. Illinois Pollution Control Board

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 13, 2010

And in addition, there is a fairly extensive discussion of public comments relating to those factors, especially public comments relating to the possibility of air pollution and to the two aquifers that … During the cure period, my understanding is that after treatment, there's a brief period during which there may be containers at the landfill. Those are removed. Those are not ever left there.

Oral argument — Andrew Hutchinson v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 19, 2023

place where the act of omission occurred. … I just wanted to make just a short comment about the distinctions and the briefing on the cases that the plaintiffs cite.

Oral argument — People v. Aero Specialty, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 24, 2015

And he did a follow-up investigation because they gave Arrow time to clean up, which is pretty customary. Yes, John. … They gave Arrow time to clean up, and so I just need to understand what it is that gave rise to the violation.

Oral argument — United States v. Rex A. Hopper

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 12, 2021

course is that there are courts of appeals that see remands differently and the 11th Circuit in Burke which is the criminal history issue is basically says a vacator in the 11th Circuit wipes the slate clean … away from the guidelines that's a pretty powerful argument it seems to me that you know under 3553 a at a minimum whether whether you're talking about an intervening murder in prison or perhaps a heroic act

Oral argument — Roger Botts v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 2, 2016

And it shows it during the entire relevant period. … The air on the ship, or the air in the, I read your brief, is largely retreating from exposure on the ship to emphasize exposure in the shipyard in general.

Oral argument — United States v. Adrian Ruiz

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 23, 2015

But reasonable suspicion isn't, this guy's not acting right. … I actually thought the agent's comment about the air conditioning was something that detracted from the probable cause.

Oral argument — Michael Sackett v. USEPA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 19, 2020

They sharply differ over the question in that case, whether under the Clean Water Act migration of a pollutant through groundwater is regulable. … So so what they have here is still some document that EPA thinks this is a wetland under the Clean Water Act.

Oral argument — City & County of San Francisco v. US Dept of Transportation

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 13, 2015

Whitman, where the statute provided that the EPA shall institute a civil action if it finds a violation of the Clean Water Act. … So the Clean Air Act's citizen supervision was passed, was instituted in 1970, the Clean Water Act in 1972, the Endangered Species Act in 1973, and this was instituted in 1976.

Oral argument — Donald Wortman v. All Nippon Airways

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 13, 2017

So, Your Honor, that comment was in the context of advertisements. … And what's critical about what happened in this case around 2000, I think it was a 1995 announcement, and then 2000 was when I added the International Air and Transportation Competition Act was passed,

Oral argument — HOLMES v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 9, 2011

If the government doesn't do what it said, i.e., if they don't clean up your personnel record, then you go in and you tell them to clean it up. It's kind of a prospective remedy. … The settlement agreement says we'll clean up your record, period. Yes.

Oral argument — Sam Stamey v. Forest River, Incorporated

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 16, 2021

Counsel, you don't contest that the comments were something that were pervasive throughout the entire period Mr. Stamey complains of, right? … Is it your position that we should keep them in three clean buckets and only focus on the age-related comments? I guess I would say this, Your Honor.

Oral argument — MONTALVO v. SPIRIT AIRLINES

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 16, 2007

There's no comment by Congress. … The field that Judge Garth had participated on, that is addressing framed in terms of the field of air safety.

Oral argument — Refined Metals Corporation v. NL Industries Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 25, 2019

When prospective regulatory and statutory requirements went into effect, Refined was the owner and operator and remained the sole owner-operator during the entire period of operation. … And the short answer is, I think what Congress was saying there is it's mandatory if there's cost recovery, but we still have the Declaratory Judgments Act, which is a discretionary act, and what the judge

Oral argument — Hudick v. Wilkie

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 3, 2018

Well, there's obviously the time period which he met, but as for that first prong, no, you're correct. … Say, for example, it actually violated the Dioxin Act. I mean, there could be a 7292 challenge.