Documents

Oral argument — United States v. Chico Martines

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 12, 2014

There was also air conditioning. There was talk about the extent of the utilities, how the utility bills had gone up to over $1,000 a month. … She was the acting supervisor that day, and she took the pictures of the different plants and the different stages and how they were spread out in the supplement.

Oral argument — Lee v. GNC Franchising, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 9, 2003

I understand you're sort of going, that's some of the theories under the Copperwell Doctrine and the Robinson-Patman and the Sherman Act that they can't conspire. … And I think under the theory that the parties are going to have a clean slate in going forward and dealing with one another.

Oral argument — In re: DAVIS

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 24, 2019

I guess this is more of a comment than a question, but it does seem to me like your client dodged a pretty big bullet here, and there is a point at which error can be clear. I mean. Well, not here. … I am struck by the numerosity of the points, and is cleaning it up later sufficient?

Oral argument — United States v. Tseng

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 3, 2009

Lee if she's standing right next to him during that time period. The sheer volume of calls lends credibility to the fact that, to Mr. … All I would say is I believe the testimony was – Can't you run a good, clean trial down there? We do our best, Your Honor. We do. I don't see that here.

Oral argument — Richard Samson v. Western Capital Partners, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 7, 2017

But the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act defines what an asset is for purposes of execution and for analysis under the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act, and that's all property of the debtor that's not exempt … Your Honor, I missed your comment. No, I was only getting you used the term fairness earlier on, right? I used the term fairness? Or fair. Yes.

Oral argument — Security Alarm Financing v. Alarm Protection Technology

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 12, 2018

The Alaska Trade Secrets Act, as to which there was no evidence of a loss resulting from an alleged misappropriation of trade secrets. And third, the Lanham Act requires causation. … be high periods of cancellation.

Oral argument — Leanna Smith v. State of Arizona

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 17, 2015

That entire series of events is one general act. … Every one of those people was acting as part of the State's investigation, and their acts are the acts, essentially, of the State, at least according to their complaint.

Oral argument — Gamez-Morles v. Pacific NW Renal

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 22, 2008

The question is whether the Americans with Disabilities Act requires that it be done. … Because you're relying on a policy that's somewhat in the air. Now we're talking about there's nothing in writing but there's a declaration.

Oral argument — Martin v. Arrow Electronics

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 4, 2009

Adario's report and saw that comment that they're now relying on, they didn't ask to continue the trial. They didn't ask to reopen discovery. … Adario about that note, and he felt like he needed to come clean, if you want to use that terminology, to the jury and explain what was going on.

Oral argument — United States v. Eric Banks

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 14, 2022

So it seems to me he's objecting under the Speedy Trial Act. … In that second letter, the head of the Department of War explicitly accepted jurisdiction over the Victorville Army Air Base that later became the George Air Force Base, and that eventually is where USPV

Oral argument — United States v. Tommy Walker

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 14, 2022

The district court did not clearly air when it found that the ends of justice demanded several continuances of Mr. … Nothing about that balancing act was clearly erroneous, and so this court should affirm. Do you agree that other trials were being conducted by other judges in the district during that period?

Oral argument — Adam Backhaut v. Apple Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 15, 2017

This Court in Conop construed definitively this in-transmission requirement and said the wiretap act applies to the acquisition of a communication while it's in the air at the speed of light. … And, again, so they aren't able to locate an actual transmission where the message is kind of plucked out of the air and acquired by someone.

Oral argument — Ricardo Cruz-Calmo v. Merrick Garland

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 12, 2022

With respect to the PSG determination, the agency, an immigration judge, acted within his considerable discretion when he found that petitioner's drunk driving offense in 2015 amounted to a particular … But what he found was that whatever it was, your client was able to avoid it for over a month during a period when he was in hiding and he viewed that as substantial evidence that if he went, if he was

Oral argument — Federal Insurance Company v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insuran

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 7, 2010

They're corroding because of the salt sea air, and does that mean that because they're corroding slowly that they've failed? No. Those bridges are serviceable. They keep working. … It's possible he was acting in his own personal capacity. The carrier there, under California law, does not owe a duty to defend.

Oral argument — Michael Jones v. County of Los Angeles

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 11, 2014

So it's not that Rivas would have gone away from that conversation, if you believe the Jones's evidence, thinking, gosh, we still don't know, it's still up in the air. … Kim comment, but he references it as it having been submitted in support of Dr. Wong's motion for summary judgment.

Oral argument — Bradley Cooper v. Thoratec Corp.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 14, 2017

And when we clean that from their opening brief at pages 18 to 19, note 2, that's where they identify which of the statements they're still challenging, and they list some statements they are no longer … This is an extraordinarily complex medical diagnosis that has to be made for each instance, and then the studies also show extensive statistical analysis to arrive at the numbers that the plaintiffs are acting

Oral argument — Adees Corp. v. Avis

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 12, 2005

One is refueling the cars, one is cleaning the cars, and one is shuttling the cars. … A year and a half, which is quite a bit more than the six-month statutory period. They're gone now, though, is that right? They are gone now.

Oral argument — Steven Morales v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 13, 2018

the accident in Mitchell in 1980 and the Part 77 regulations as they are in effect today are similar in all relevant respects, in that certain structures below an altitude are not deemed a hazard to air … GOTTLIEB I'd just like to address a couple of comments very quickly.

Oral argument — Michael Buhl v. Abbott Laboratories

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 9, 2020

And while it may be unpopular, Michael Buell, a Caucasian male, is entitled to the protection of the California Fair Employment and Housing Act based on national origin and race. … In other words, doing exactly what his superiors at Abbott had told him not to do, airing grievances widely and outside of his department. Is that wrong?

Oral argument — Merit Healthcare Int'l v. Merit Medical Systems

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 9, 2017

I'd like to first address, if I could, your comment, Judge Watford, about Northstar. … You're stuck with liability for a longer period of time. Is that your problem?