Documents

Oral argument — Autery v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 18, 2005

And at this point, I'm – I was focusing on jurisdiction under the Federal Tort Claims Act. … Air Board that was out – that had a complaint in 1996 about the disking.

Oral argument — Empress Casino Joliet Corp. v. W. E. O'Neil Construction Co.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 12, 2016

And we've cited to the court the Contribution Act as well as several statutes that apply that. … Your Honor made the comment about the fee poisoning.

Oral argument — Lewis v. Superintendent Phoenix SCI

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 20, 2026

Who heard those comments? The comments that I'm about to get into. Specifically, did the jury hear these comments that are attributed to the judge? … As to issue two, the comments in McKernan were egregious.

Oral argument — Exhaustless Inc. v. FAA

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 13, 2019

The word phase out in the Wendell Ford Air 21 Act is not because Congress intended in January of 2007 that that would be the beginning of a gradual phase out of the HDR methodology. … Ferris, I want to address maybe the last point first about other periods could come in.

Oral argument — Upstate Forever v. Kinder Morgan Energy Partners

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 7, 2017

It says that this historic spill violates the Clean Water Act. … There may be a Clean Water Act violation.

Oral argument — Christopher Smith v. Larry Small

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 7, 2013

of time is reasonable that period of time isn't reasonable but those those time periods are to me related to the circumstances of those cases and we still don't have a bright line rule of what is the … time limit between each stage of the proceedings and whether there is a correct way to proceed in the state court I wish the legislature would act here I'm petrified as a 2254 attorney every time I get

Oral argument — Smith v. DHS

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 4, 2016

During the investigation that took place when the Federal Air Marshals were told that the incident had occurred at a particular period of time based upon ambulance records and based upon hospital records … I have a comment. It seems to me that the confidentiality markings in your briefs are improper.

Oral argument — Ohio Valley Environmental v. Scott Pruitt

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 8, 2018

It's defined in the Clean Water Act, so it's under federal law. Okay. So as defined in the Clean Water Act, West Virginia has been submitting TMDLs. Yes, that's exactly right. … Well, and the Clean Water Act lets them do that, right?

Oral argument — People v. Crowder

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 26, 2018

Harmon saw this and got his fiancee's gun and fired it into the air when he saw John coming at his fiancee with his gun. … It was shot in an intentional manner in the air and not shot in the direction of anyone. So below, the trial court did not find that the defendant was acting in self-defense.

Oral argument — Kisor v. Wilkie

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 27, 2019

And again, I think the agency's, the VA's own conduct here indicates that when it wishes to have the force of law, it acts through notice and comment rulemaking. Ginsburg. … You could do notice and comment rulemaking. That takes a very long period of time. In the meantime, there are two things to do.

Oral argument — North Carolina Coastal Fisheries Reform Group v. Capt. Gaston LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 25, 2022

of the fairway under the Clean Water Act. … Under the Clean Water Act, they can catch as many bycatch as they want because that's not what the Clean Water Act is about.

Oral argument — TexasChemistry Council v. EPA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 1, 2026

The industry air monitoring data, which again, EPA relies on to say the ECCL is feasible, proves that respirators don't really have to do heavy lifting. … Even when they are not directly handling asbestos, they are still exposed to asbestos fibers that continue to circulate in the air.

Oral argument — Decker v. Northwest Environmental Defense Center

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 3, 2012

Congress completely revamped the Clean Water Act's approach to stormwater in 1987. … Stewart Well, I think the question of attorney's fees, if the Ninth Circuit's decision was vacated on the ground that the case would become moot, attorney's fees are available under the Clean Water Act

Oral argument — Alaska Wilderness League v. Sally Jewell

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 13, 2014

The Clean Water Act requires Shell to implement these plans. That's at 1321C3B and J5F. … Do those words represent the substantive mandate and fulfill the mandate that this agency has under the Clean Water Act?

Oral argument — Northern California River Watc v. Carl Wilcox

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 14, 2009

So it means those kinds of areas that are subject to the Clean Water Act? … In the Habitat Conservation Why hasn't Congress done so under the Clean Water Act by declaring, okay, this is what happens under the Clean Water Act.

Oral argument — In Interest of N.R.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 31, 2014

Well, what the court said in the findings, which were supplemented later, the minor was subject to extreme periods of being grounded. … But they put in their comments, and every single comment related to a religious belief that she had that they didn't agree with, you know, and it's the court's job to kind of filter that out and realize

Oral argument — Valli v. Avis Budget Group Inc

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 16, 2025

And it only became enforceable here on class certification and after the op out period. … What was the time period for that? It was a three-year period. It was all after they inserted this clause in the customer agreement.

Oral argument — County of Will v. Illinois Pollution Control Board

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 23, 2019

We took in public comment. We asked questions after the hearing of the participants seeking information. … Noncompliance is an enforcement action under Title VII of the Act.

Oral argument — Graham v. CIR

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 18, 2007

It's like mounting clear air. On the other hand the application and the interpretation of the tax code is reviewed de novo. … because well and right because of the omission yes but that but when the 135,000 was included in the amended return all of the appropriate tax penalty and interest that accrued for that three or four week period

Oral argument — United States v. Windsor Kessler, III

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 10, 2023

And I think that that in and of itself bears on the question of whether indeed there were objections that preserved for an appellate review other than plain air, because... … And it seems to me that the probation officer acted somewhat aggressive right outside the courtroom and say, here, take it or leave it. Why not just clean the case up?