Documents

Oral argument — Ryll v. Merck

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 6, 2004

What they said was one comment by one individual that no one else knew about was not enough. … Rather, the jury is there to determine whether the employer acted reasonably. And how do you act reasonably?

Oral argument — Leanna Smith v. State of Arizona

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 17, 2015

That entire series of events is one general act. … Every one of those people was acting as part of the State's investigation, and their acts are the acts, essentially, of the State, at least according to their complaint.

Oral argument — Rhead v. Mundy

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 8, 2003

And they took me to the fire station instead of the hospital first and cleaned me up and then took me to the hospital. And they were also, they never Mirandized me. … We appreciate your comments. You have two minutes left, so if you'd like to have a seat while you're on the other side. Okay, I will. Mr. Reed, why don't you have a seat at the counsel table? Mr.

Oral argument — Cliff Mosco v. Motricity Inc

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 8, 2016

So roughly I'm going to try to leave him around five minutes to back clean up. So are you prepared to talk about the registration statement? I am, Your Honor. All right. … I'd like to start with the IPO comments first. I agree that Your Honor should look at exactly what was said, and what you'll see is it's not a statement that referred to the time of the IPO.

Oral argument — Francisco Ramirez, Jr. v. Pat Vasques

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 7, 2014

I think we're about to talk about Sandoval, and I'm interested in your comments. … She was a little bit surprised and then walked into the bathroom to clean herself up. But then her 11-year-old son entered the room, and Mr. Unruh grabbed the boy and placed a gun to his head.

Oral argument — United States v. Tommy Walker

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 14, 2022

The district court did not clearly air when it found that the ends of justice demanded several continuances of Mr. … Nothing about that balancing act was clearly erroneous, and so this court should affirm. Do you agree that other trials were being conducted by other judges in the district during that period?

Oral argument — Bridget Gordon v. Deloitte and Touche, LLP Group

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 10, 2013

Is it, what act is it that breathed new life? Is it that letter? It is opening all of them together. The initial act is reopening the claim in response to the DOI complaint. … And at no time in that time period did MetLife ever say, your case is time barred.

Oral argument — United States v. Richard

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 13, 2007

The judge's comments are 281 of the record. And I don't think I need to repeat those. … Doesn't our recent panel decision that we asked you to comment say just that?

Oral argument — United States v. Gregory Berry

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 2, 2013

In the district court's word, the district court was concerned that he was trying to game the system, essentially build air into the proceedings. … He had three attorneys in an eight- to nine-month period. What about the fact that the court itself vacillated?

Oral argument — 35574 Sletteland v. Blendu

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 3, 2004

During the period, after the period of time it was stayed, we began discovery, and we deposed Mr. Blendew. And after I deposed Mr. Blendew, I moved to the court to allow to amend the complaint. … I'll just – most of this will be addressed to the comments of Mr. Troutmate. With regard to the last one, first of all, I don't understand why Mr.

Oral argument — Brian Newton v. Parker Drilling Mgmt. Svcs.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 7, 2017

Or meal periods. Okay. … Supreme Court held that OXLA does not apply for that time period where they're commuting from the shore. So that answers that question.

Oral argument — Johnsonr v. Columbia Properties Anchorage, LP

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 14, 2005

This is not something that was promulgated according to the Magnuson Act rulemaking. It doesn't have the force of law. … The first sentence says, no major changes were made in the final rule due to comments received on the proposed rule. This change was not made due to comments. We know that.

Oral argument — Progressive Gulf Ins v. Faehnrich

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 12, 2008

Yeah, it's part question, part comment. I'm concerned about jurisdiction in this case, and I meant to get an order out before argument, but didn't. … The children had not stayed in the jurisdiction for a particular period of time, but had demonstrated a period of intent to remain in the jurisdiction.

Oral argument — Gaudin v. Remis

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 11, 2004

The wrongful act that is attacked as the symptom to the thing that has to be fixed is the habitual residence. … Any other questions or comments? Thank you, counsel, both of you, for your argument in this matter. The matter just argued will be submitted.

Oral argument — Solomon Kelly v. Beazer Homes USA, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 7, 2014

But there are actually three things I want to just clean up very quickly that have happened so far. One is what you just talked about, Judge Fletcher, about it being an affirmative defense. … And so, as Judge Smith said, you have things like the Subdivided Lands Act, which are pages and pages of disclosures about the community, about, you know, the soils in the community or what's going on

Oral argument — Prime Healthcare Services, Inc v. SEIU

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 4, 2016

, wipe the slate clean, and then went on as sort of the fact finder, finding their own interpretation of what these isolated facts were. … What happened in that period? You start seeing acts where the union and Kaiser are acting against their own interest.

Oral argument — Heather Conahan v. Kathleen Sibelius

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 11, 2011

I mean, isn't that why she wanted to act so quickly, because she was afraid that she was talking about a matter of weeks? … If you do a surgery and do not allow for clean margins, there's really no point in doing the surgery.

Oral argument — American Guarantee & Liability Ins. Co. v. Lexington Ins. Co.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 19, 2013

In that case, the subcontractor employee who was injured was working on an air conditioning unit on the roof of a building. … In Sciufi, there was no possible way of saying that the air conditioning subcontractor had anything to do with the faulty hatch.

Oral argument — United States v. Keith Jenkins

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 12, 2010

Is this a plein air standard? Should we be applying a plein air standard? … Never mind constructive, just period. Are you going to prosecute me because there's a gun someplace, and you're going to say I controlled it, but I had no intention of controlling it?

Oral argument — N. G. v. County of Los Angeles

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 13, 2018

There was no weighing, no dub air, no 702. Well, did you make a motion for dub air hearing prior to trial? On that issue? Yes, we made a motion to exclude the post-mortem toxicology. … And he did so in a responsible fashion that reminded the jury of the limits of his ability to question or comment.