Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.07s
Security Zone; Suisun Bay, Concord, CA
Federal Register · Rule · Jan 24, 2005
In addition, Coast Guard Group San Francisco Bay maintains a telephone line that is maintained 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. … The public can contact Group San Francisco Bay at (415) 399-3530 to obtain information concerning enforcement of this rule.
70 FR 3299Homeland Security DepartmentCoast GuardPetition for Writ of Certiorari — Litteral v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North America
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1962
Board of Publie Edication, BT | U. 8. 399. should not be overruled. … L. 30, 24 PLS. £ 11-1122. This decision was -. affirmed by the United States Supreme Courts at 357 U7. 8. 399, 409, 2 L. Ed. 2d 1404. 1433, 78 8.
370 U.S. 919Federal Register · Notice · Mar 10, 2014
Data from the public is requested pursuant to Public Law 99-399 (Omnibus Diplomatic Security and Antiterrorism Act of 1986), as amended; Public Law 107-56 (USA PATRIOT Act); and Executive Order 13356. … Dated: February 24, 2014. Michael Dennis, Attorney-Adviser, Office of Private International Law.
79 FR 13370State DepartmentAmicus Curiae Brief — United Water Conservation District, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Nov 28, 2025
App. 38a). 20 Int’l Paper, 282 U.S. 399. 21 Gerlach, 339 U.S. 725. 22 Dugan, 372 U.S. 609. 23 Pet. App. 11a. 24 See id. at 13a. 25 Penn Central, 438 U.S. 104. 26 Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. … Water Code § 1610. 24 II.
Respondents Brief — Kloeb v. Armour & Co.
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 1940
A. 399)........ 17 5. … A. 399). 5.
311 U.S. 199Brief for the United States in Opposition — Morgan v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Brief for the United States in Opposition · 1969
On the basis of those supplement- ed findings and its own review of the record, the court of apneals th¥n affirmed. 399 F. 2d 93 (Pet. App. 13- 24). No further review is warranted. … App. 23 n. 2, 24).
393 U.S. 1025Amicus Curiae Brief — Colorado v. Bertine
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1987
Vale v- Louisiana, 399 U.S. 30 (1970). Cc. … Procedure After 24 Hours.
479 U.S. 367Petition for A Writ of Certiorari — Brigandi v. New York
Supreme Court brief · Petition for A Writ of Certiorari · 1973
MARONEY, 399 U.S. 42, 51. … LOUISIANA, 399 U.S. 30, and WARDEN v. HAYDEN, 387 U.S. 294, as well as ZAP v.
414 U.S. 1040Appellees Brief — Gardner v. Broderick
Supreme Court brief · Appellees Brief · 1968
S. . 399 (1958), Lerner v. Casey, 357 U. S. 468 (1958), and “Nelson v. … S. 399 (1958); Lerner v. Casey, 357 © U. S. 468° (1958); Nelson v. County of Los Angeles, 362 U. S: 1 (1960).
392 U.S. 273Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Jonathan Guerra Blanco, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Oct 24, 2024
Awan, 607 F.3d 306 (2d Cir. 2010) .............. 11, 18, 21, 24-28 United States v. … Wright, 747 F.3d 399, 408 (6th Cir. 2014); United States v. Mohamed, 757 F.3d 757, 760 (8th Cir. 2014); United States v.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Kendrick Jarrell Beaird, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jul 7, 2026
Hendon, 541 U.S. 1 (2004) ............................................... 24 Skidmore v. Swift & Co., 323 U.S. 134 (1944) ............................... 21, 22, 24 Stinson v. … Loper Bright called this delegation theory a “fiction” that does not “approximate reality.” 603 U.S. at 399, 404.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Jimcy McGirt, Petitioner v. Oklahoma
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 20, 2020
Utah, 510 U.S. 399, 411 (1994); Solem, 465 U.S. at 471; Rosebud Sioux Tribe v. Kneip, 430 U.S. 584, 588 n.4 (1977). … and Indian tribes, including those relating to tobacco, motor fuel sales tax, gaming, motor vehicle and license tags, water rights, and water quality that greatly benefit their members.2 Nations Br. 15-24
Opposition Brief — Sturman v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1992
Green, 399 U.S. 149, 165-166 (1970). … Green, 399 U.S. at 156; see also White v. Illinois, 112 S.
504 U.S. 985Appellees Brief — Taylor v. Louisiana
Supreme Court brief · Appellees Brief · 1975
Florida, 399 U.S. 78, 90 S. … Oregon, 406 U.S. 399, 92 S.
419 U.S. 522Petition for a Writ of Certiorari — Murphy v. Oregon
Supreme Court brief · Petition for a Writ of Certiorari · 1970
* of August 24. By making a telephone call to Camp Sher- ° man,: Oregon, and talking to a Mr. … ARD-US 1.88.5 Cr 1868 OL Ed 24-889 (1968). Ic Saluws ‘The?
400 U.S. 944Safety Zone; Jackson Fireworks Scattering; Yellow Bluff San Francisco Bay, Sausalito, CA
Federal Register · Rule · Mar 2, 2022
Solares, Coast Guard Sector San Francisco, at 415-399-3585, SFWaterways@uscg.mil. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. … Persons and vessels may request permission to enter the safety zone on VHF-23A or through the 24-hour Command Center at telephone (415) 399-3547. (d) Enforcement period.
87 FR 11583Homeland Security DepartmentCoast GuardSafety Zone; Red, White, and Blue Fireworks, Incline Village, NV
Federal Register · Rule · Jul 2, 2008
Coast Guard Sector San Francisco, at (415) 399-7436. If you have questions on viewing the docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone 202-366-9826. … Persons and vessels may request permission to enter the safety zone on VHF-16 or the 24-hour Command Center via telephone at (415) 399-3547. (d) Effective period .
73 FR 37813Homeland Security DepartmentCoast GuardSecurity Zones; Major League Baseball All-Star Game, San Francisco Bay, CA
Federal Register · Rule · Jun 15, 2007
Coast Guard Sector San Francisco, at (415) 556-2950 extension 143 or Sector San Francisco 24-hour Command Center at (415) 399-3547. … Coast Guard Sector San Francisco at (415) 556-2950 extension 143, or the 24 hour Command Center at (415) 399-3547.
72 FR 33160Homeland Security DepartmentCoast GuardPrologue — Ribaudo v. United States (No. 05-1293)
Supreme Court brief · Prologue · 2005
Rorie, 58 M.J. 399 (C.A.A.F. 2003) ....... a3 United States v. Jones, 61 M.J. 80 (C.A.A.F. 2005) .......... 4 United States Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit United States v. … Rorie, 58 M.J. 399, 406 (C.A.A.F. 2003). This was error. There is no indication that Congress 4 desired any exceptions to Article 71, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. 871.
Opposition — Bowman v. Simpson
Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1977
Davidowitz, 312 U.S. 52, 61 S.Ct. 399, 85 L.Ed. Pe WEE DditCh on ch b ens cae shabadses eesvasencese Williams v. McKnight, 402 S.W.2d 505 (Tex. … Davidowitz, 312 U.S. 52, 61 S.Ct. 399, 85 L.Ed. 581 (1941). The full objectives of Congress in this case can only be served if Texas Community property law prevails.
434 U.S. 877
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.