Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
264 results
1.17s
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Agency decision · Agency decision
The five-year period runs from the moment when the action accrued. Id. The action begins to accrue depending on which section of the Form I-9 was not completed in a timely manner. Id. at 11-12. … Cleaning Servs. of Long Island Ltd., 13 OCAHO no. 1314, 3 (2018) (emphasis in original); see also United States v. Frio Cnty.
Executive Office for Immigration ReviewAgency decision · Agency decision
In our view, it was inappropriate to admit these comments into evidence. … We have given the comments no consideration in reaching our decision.
Executive Office for Immigration ReviewAgency decision · Agency decision
We will, however, add a further comment regarding our finding in Anwo that the legislative history of section 212(c) supported the Board's interpretation of that section in view of the Second Circuit's … The Seventh Proviso of section 3 of the 1917 Immigration Act was the predecessor to section 212(c) of the 1952 Act.
Executive Office for Immigration ReviewAgency decision · Agency decision
of Davis, 16 I&N Dec. 748 (BIA 1979); Matter of Pritchard, 161&N Dec. 340 (BIA 1977); Matter of Wolf, supra; Matter of wadh, 15 I&N Dec. 775 (BIA 1976); Matter of Pasquini, 15 I&N Dec. 683 (BIA 1976), air … In this regard we note the Second Circuit's questionable comment that a person convicted under the British law at issue would be "quite innocent under our system of criminal justice." Lennon v.
Executive Office for Immigration ReviewAgency decision · Agency decision
Section 242(b) of the Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(1994) (emphasis added); see also section 236 of the Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1226 (1994). … The federal courts have not been shy in recognizing the often unsupportable subjective and conjectural conclusions periodically drawn by adjudicators.
Executive Office for Immigration ReviewAgency decision · Agency decision
The savings clause is not invoked here and needs no comment, If it was the contention thit a suspended sentence cannot be considered 2 conviction for immigration purposes because.it lacks finality that … Every. defendant who has fulfilled the conditions of his probation for the entire period-thereof,-or who shall hove been. discharged from probation prior to the termination of the period thereof, may at
Executive Office for Immigration ReviewAgency decision · Agency decision
Moreover, a Congressional comment appears to envision the existence of a sentence to confinement to make an alien deportable. … The existing sentence which must be recognized by this Board is the one to probation for a period of ten months.
Executive Office for Immigration ReviewAgency decision · Agency decision
repealed in 1952 when the legislature enacted the Law on Domestic Relations . 2 This law is still in force today and although this Law on Domestic Relations includes no reference to common-law marriage, its commentators … During the period the extra-marital relationship existed, no relationship of stepparent and stepchild was created between the beneficiary and the petitioner.
Executive Office for Immigration ReviewAgency decision · Agency decision
In commenting on subsection 4 of section 241 of the Immigration Act, the report from the Committee on the Judiciary submitted with the bill, S-2550, states that this a uction involves aliens who, within … The alien had been sentenced to imprisonment, sentence suspended, placed on probation, and after the probationary period had passed, sentence was revoked and the case was placed "on file."
Executive Office for Immigration ReviewAgency decision · Agency decision
public accountancy work in the United Kingdom; and (4) an acknowledgment of assist649 Interim Decision 4t1843 ance by the applicant in the preface of a textbook for providing "reader reaction" with comments … During this time he received acknowledgment in a textbook preface in a manual of tax practices for his comments and suggestions in connection with the writing of such book During this period he was admitted
Executive Office for Immigration ReviewAgency decision · Agency decision
On June 3, 2003, the Superior Court accommodated the respondent’s request and, without comment, reduced his period of probationary detention from 365 days to 240 days, nunc pro tunc to December 20, 2001 … Section 101(a)(48)(B) of the Act provides as follows: Any reference to a term of imprisonment of a sentence with respect to an offense is deemed to include the period of incarceration or confinement ordered
Executive Office for Immigration ReviewAgency decision · Agency decision
The final regulations were published on January 18, 1977, following receipt and consideration of various comments from interested persons and organizations. … The beneficiary's work experience shows progressively more responsible positions in the field of biochemistry, immunology, and biology over an 11-year period.
Executive Office for Immigration ReviewAgency decision · Agency decision
Onenoz: Order: Act of 1952—Section 241(a) (2) [8 U.S.C. 1251(a) (2) ]—Nonimmigrant (crewman)—Remained longer. … He has remained in this country since the expiration of the temporary period .of his admission without authority.
Executive Office for Immigration ReviewCite as 25 I&N Dec. 246 (BIA 2010)
Agency decision · Agency decision
of such motions that may be filed and a maximum time period for the filing of such motions . . . . … the Attorney General to promulgate regulations specifying the maximum time period for the filing of those motions, hinting that a 20-day period would be appropriate. 4 Although the legislative history
Executive Office for Immigration ReviewAgency decision · Agency decision
He argues that the immigration judge did not have the authority to fix a period of time by which the claims must be filed; that such acts are in contravention of the laws or regulations of the United States … See section 242(b) of the Act, 8 U.S.C. 1252(b); see also 8 C.F.R. 242.17(e).
Executive Office for Immigration ReviewAgency decision · Agency decision
The officer in charge of. this Service at Albany has referred the application to the Regional Commissioner,. through official channels, with the comment that he does not believe applicant is a permanent … Interim Decision No. 1376 (Matter of Sehonfeld, decided by the Acting Regional Commissioner May 26, 1964) is distinguished.
Executive Office for Immigration ReviewAgency decision · Agency decision
Citing Redekop- Rempening, it observed: Where employment, if taken, will only be after a bona Me period of preparation, as in the case of one who has come to the United States to study, a certification … Commenting on the applicant's appeal that Fulgencio was inapplicable, the Board made the following observations in dismissing the appeal: The fact that the respondent in Fulgencio was married was a consideration
Executive Office for Immigration ReviewCite as 23 I&N Dec. 423 (BIA 2002)
Agency decision · Agency decision
When the quoted regulations were initially published for comment in 1998, a number of commenters suggested that, in light of the ameliorative purposes of the NACARA, the regulations did not go far enough … ] if the alien has departed from the United States for any period in excess of 90 days or for any periods in the aggregate exceeding 180 days.
Executive Office for Immigration ReviewAgency decision · Agency decision
In his decision of September 26, 1951, granting the appellant's application under the Displaced Persons Act, the Assistant Commissioner made the following significant comment concerning the German seizure … Only the second of these merits specific comment.
Executive Office for Immigration ReviewAgency decision · Agency decision
CHARGE: Order: Act of 1952—Section 241(a)(2) [8 U.S.C. 1251(a)(2)1—Entry without inspection (both respondents). … In his oral opinion at the close of the hearing, the special inquiry officer commented on the husband's adverse immigration history and stated that if the husband's case alone were before him, he would
Executive Office for Immigration Review
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.