Documents

Oral argument — USAv. Krasley

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 31, 2022

Can you comment on that? Yeah. I mean, that was a critical issue in the case. … Isn't that for a jury to determine whether his comments are believable or not? Of course.

Oral argument — In Re AE Liquidation

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 8, 2016

How could a brief statement of the basis for reducing the notification period satisfy the mandate of the statute and give to employees the information they need to determine whether a notice period was … properly shortened under the Act if there's no reference to the Act itself?

Oral argument — United States v. Best

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 10, 2020

and verified under penalty of perjury that this is recollection that he can put into this motion at this time which is that he saw him sleep on several occasions that the some jurors also saw that and commented … allegations are clearly frivolous and you know to take a slightly different care very different case where all the defendant does is say I saw that my my counsel sleeping a substantial amount of time period

Oral argument — United States v. Fruit

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 14, 2020

Judge Hardiman articulated, if those as a matter of law are reasonable, then this question about the identity, the name of the cousin, would be permitted under the Constitution pursuant to a terrorist act … But I'll just point the court, in conclusion of my initial argument, to two periods of 45 seconds during that seven and a half minute period when the trooper asked my client and the passenger about their

Oral argument — United States v. Waterman

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2009

Your Honor, the record is not entirely clear about exactly the time period that he was standing there. … Is submission a physical act, or a mental act, or are we supposed to slice it that thin?

Oral argument — McCall v. City of Philadelphia

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 6, 2015

So as Judge Fuentes has just commented, and as your adversary has ended her argument, this all comes down to three days. Yes. Out of all of this, does it? Well, yes. … and to clean out the bathrooms and empty the trash.

Oral argument — Estate of Joseph Maglioli v. Alliance HC Holdings LL C

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 23, 2021

Most health care providers could be covered as federal officers for this limited period of time, recognizing that the PrEP Act and this argument of ours that we were acting as federal officers is time … Services broad powers, emergency powers for a limited time period and a specific purpose to address the national health emergencies.

Oral argument — Skrutski v. Marut

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2009

Because he did not obey the order to commit what we believe to be an illegal act. Correct. Yes. … Obviously, we disagree with the remand period. But how do you get around Rush? I mean, I don't.

Oral argument — Valdes v. Stateof NJ

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2009

At this point, he's a trainee, and the regulation says that all trainees are to be clean shaven, period. It doesn't say anything about any exemption for anybody. … Yeah, but that really isn't playing here, because the regulation on its face simply requires all trainees to be clean-shaven.

Oral argument — Page v. Trusteesof Penn

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 15, 2007

Two police officers entered, one who was male, and it became they had to clean out another officer's locker. … It has to be done at certain periods of time.

Oral argument — United States v. Zabielski

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 1, 2012

It's a clean sentence. It's a fair sentence. It's lenient and fair, and it's clean, and what are we doing? Shouldn't we articulate some harmless error doctrine for cases just like this? … Whether it's spoken or acts are done to induce that thought, I mean, every teller believes that they have to act now. Well, that's true.

Oral argument — Trinity Industries Inc v. Greenlease Holding Company

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 6, 2017

It is true that at that time dividends were declared and $250,000 or thereabouts was reserved, which incidentally survived through a period of 18 years later when this claim first arose. … The presumption is that they were acting in their appropriate role, wearing the hat of Greenlease when operating as their directors.

Oral argument — Cosmetic Gallery Inc v. Schoenemann Corp

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2009

I'm going to clean up my act. I'm going to open a new store, and what I'm going to do is put a salon in there. Well, as Mr. DeFeo said, that didn't happen until July of 2001. … Shainman as a reference as to his purported cleaning up his act. And Mr. Shainman responds, No, it's not true. I'm not doing business with him and I'm not going to meet with him in Las Vegas.

Oral argument — United States v. Forehand

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 9, 2009

But you're not here writing on a clean slate. You are here with Judge Bozzano's fairly extensive findings of fact and conclusions of law, and, yes, credibility determinations. … This court, when it's undertaking clear air review of credibility findings, and that's precisely what we have here. Ms.

Oral argument — International Unionof Bricklayers v. Banta Tile&Marble Company

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 14, 2009

And those agreements provided for how to terminate them beyond the period stated in the agreement, right? That's correct. And Banta never did that? … You have Atlas Air and the Eighth Circuit there. They solely went on in the Eighth Circuit in Atlas Air under the local terms of the arbitration provision.

Oral argument — Hanover Insurance Company v. Urban Outfitter,IN Cet.al

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 4, 2015

First, the Frog Switch case, and second, the Air Products case. … involved, or reasons, trademark infringement or dilution, Indian Arts and Crafts Act violations, unfair competition.

Oral argument — Womackvs Smith

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2009

Refused to, staffers offered to take him out of restraints so that he could clean his cell. Appellant actually refused to take him out of restraints. … Isn't there a dispute of fact as to whether it was available within the 20-day period?

Oral argument — United States v. Lowmaster

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 17, 2022

But every but he act. I mean, everybody acted as though they understood. Yeah. I'm just saying, if you if you got this order and you said, well, I'm just going to blow it off. … Just just a couple of points to to chime in on Judge Fisher Fisher's comments and Judge Porter's comments originally.

Oral argument — United States v. Caraballo-Rodrigues Rehearing En Banc

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 29, 2013

I guess your comment seems to me to go right to the heart of it when you say there's something extra. … Just another piece of evidence in which you could infer they were all acting together. Judge, I don't.

Oral argument — Trematore Plumbing Heating v. Sheet M Workers Local25

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 4, 2025

That was air HVAC, and he didn't subcontract out. But the CBA was still in effect. … Because we establish greater rights, because we establish full rights under the Act, why would we have fewer rights than we had when we didn't have full rights under the Act?