Documents

Oral argument — United States v. Charles Yi

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 6, 2012

We don't have that because the statute under the Clean Air Act does not require knowledge of illegality. All it requires is knowledge of asbestos. … But to address your comment directly, it also did not support that there was deliberate avoidance because as the cases say, deliberate avoidance is an active act. It's an intentional act.

Oral argument — Pakootas v. Teck Cominco Metals

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 5, 2005

Worthy of comment. We do think it is an extraterritorial application. That's the argument. … Well, I think the act is written. I'm sorry? I think the act is written.

Oral argument — American Trucking Associations v. The City of Los Angeles

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2011

May it please the Court, I represent the Environmental Intervenors, the Natural Resources Defense Council, the Sierra Club, and the Coalition for Clean Air. … One, the concession agreement imposes maintenance requirements on LMCs, and the district court found that ongoing maintenance is critical to the port being able to achieve its clean air objectives.

Oral argument — Aaron Eaton v. Eynon

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 12, 2023

There was periodic cleaning and various things and they were not successful, certainly according to your client's version of the facts. … One was by a nurse who said, I did an air test and it was even better than last time. We have no medical records about that test. We have no idea what that means.

Oral argument — Kazenercom Too v. Ibar Development, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 8, 2011

Currently, it sets out the 30-plus instances of mail and wire fraud conducted over a four-plus-year period, including time period after this action was filed. … It's not easy to satisfy the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act.

Oral argument — United States v. Cortes Nava

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 4, 2025

I think that the nature of the air here and the extent to which it was emphasized is what makes this plain and clear air for the court. … And those factors include the extent of the comments, whether the inference was stressed, and the weight of the evidence.

Oral argument — GCM Air Group, LLC v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 17, 2010

May it please the Court, my name is Jim Pusey from the law firm of Santoro Driggs, and I represent the appellant GCM Air Group. … The claim is that they were misled by silence or affirmative misrepresentation as to the scope of the contamination and, therefore, the ability of Chevron to clean it up in a reasonable period of time.

Oral argument — United States v. Miguel Garibay

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 5, 2012

The fact that the cars clean. Some people keep their cars clean. Some people keep their cars dirty. Agent Ballas said that he had encountered in his experience some vehicles that were clean. … And so I know the clear air standard is difficult to meet generally, but this Court's hands are not bound by the district court's credibility findings.

Oral argument — Native Village of Kivalina IRA v. USEPA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 26, 2012

The lead authority for implementing the Clean Water Act, the NPDES program of the Clean Water Act in Alaska, for all mining properties at that point, would be the state of Alaska. … And there's still rights under the Clean Water Act that are federal even when it's implemented by a state.

Oral argument — Ann Aarestad v. CSS

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 29, 2011

If you're involved in big industrial buildings where you've got air like here where it's going through the whole building, cleaning supplies are a huge thing. Perfumes are a huge thing. … You're getting the cold air and car fumes coming into your booth.

Oral argument — Hawaii Wildlife Fund v. County of Maui

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 12, 2017

The Clean Water Act requires states to adopt those programs. … They said this when they did the Waters of the United States rule that's now a little bit up in the air in terms of its vitality, but nonetheless EPA cites in their brief the responses to comments in which

Oral argument — Our Money Our Transit v. FTA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 5, 2017

I mean, you know, the effect on air quality and – I mean, one effect will be that you'll have more cars going through there, and actually the air will get worse without the buses. … There's nothing in the record that somehow these clean buses create pollen. It is related to emissions. Well, these clean buses aren't adding any emissions. They're not adding a road here.

Oral argument — United States v. Adams

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 12, 2006

And his sentencing occurred at the conclusion of many acts. … There were no specific dates on which any particular fraudulent act went down. So the point is a conspiracy began at some point continued through the period February 2001 forward.

Oral argument — Alejandro Rodriguez v. Timothy Robbins

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 4, 2013

And we're not riding on a clean slate on this. … So six months didn't come out of thin air. Courts have already done this.

Oral argument — Alec Marsh v. J. Alexander's LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 20, 2017

The primary factor there is that the Department of Labor's legal brief on page 16 tries to bolster the deference for its regulation by saying that it was the result of a notice-made comment period. … And it involves a situation of waitresses who, after work hours, clean the salad bar, clean and stock the waitress station, clean and reset the tables, and vacuum the floor.

Oral argument — Phys for Social Responsibility v. EPA

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 11, 2016

The key to the bar is the open global policy balance from the first one under the Clean Air Act. … Now, the Clean Air Army court says that, look, these aren't inclusive.

Oral argument — United States v. Nicholson

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 13, 2008

The ‑‑ I'd like to now deal quickly with the Clean Water Act claim against the Nicholsons and particularly the summary judgment. … There would be a trial on the merits, Your Honor, as to whether a Clean Water Act violation occurred.

Oral argument — Angels Alliance Group v. ReconTrust Co.

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 4, 2015

I think I best not comment in response to that, Judge Fletcher. … But I do think the case law indicates that sort of this keeping the ball up in the air theory is not one that establishes Article III standing.

Oral argument — Danielle Smith v. Pepsi Americas

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 16, 2013

In that air model at the Remco site at the ground zero where plaintiffs were frequenting, you know, the Luna's market, the air model provided ambient air concentration of 10 micrograms for the period from … Like, for example, he showed in 2006, when the groundwater was being cleaned, his 2006, Dr.

Oral argument — United States v. David Crosby

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 27, 2018

Well, there's got to be some leeway for the prosecutor to comment on credibility given the credibility instruction, right? I agree with that, Your Honor. Yeah. … So he's still on clean ground, right? I think he's walking a fine line, especially given that Mr. Crosby has a presumption of innocence.