Documents

Oral argument — Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. v. ITC

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 7, 2014

But under both the Administrative Procedure Act, the Commission's rules, and Supreme Court precedent, cross-examination of a witness is a matter of right. So once Dr. … Both parties got it very late in the discovery period. Both parties supplemented. That's why the timing worked out the way it did. But what happened is this.

Oral argument — Bethea v. DOJ

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 1, 2018

And the one exception was Coalition for Clean Air, which was criticized in the Carr case. You're into your rebuttal time. I'm sorry, Your Honor. Reserve it. So if I could reserve... … It did not accept tort liability and his acts were not the Fire Department's for purposes of sovereign immunity. And so he was not acting in an official capacity at that time.

Oral argument — Bidnick v. DOJ

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 3, 2016

Bidnick had a clean record up to this point. Yes, sir. And he's now in training for a new position, is that right? Correct, your honor. … With respect to a couple of comments here, the agency contends that the penalty is left to the sound discretion of the agency. That's not correct.

Oral argument — Gallo v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 7, 2008

It favored air traffic controllers. They received a number of pay increases while she took another job outside air traffic control because she was medically disqualified for it. … I think it's very possible to read Fausto as saying there's a single forum being created here called the Merit System Protection Board to deal with all personnel matters, period.

Oral argument — Winterton v. MSPB

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 8, 2019

And from that period on, from September of 2015 until August of 2015, you had numerous incidents occurring at this Napa Tower, which caused him and other air traffic controllers to make numerous complaints … Because it is a criminal act if there is some conspiracy of all the ATCs to not show up to work. I would agree with you, Judge Shannon.

Oral argument — Qingdao Taifa v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 8, 2009

Because first of all, in the Padden Act, there wasn't a specific remedy provided for in the act itself. There was a right. … Well, we went through a spirit law argument with Judge Gustavi about this, and she acknowledged that the TIFA employees came clean. But importantly- No, no, no, they didn't come clean.

Oral argument — NOVARTIS v. REA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 5, 2013

Not absurdity of the nature that, well, this doesn't necessarily make sense, and if I was thinking about it with a clean slate, I would have done it slightly differently, and perhaps it wasn't the most … We are not here on Tucker Act jurisdiction. Tucker Act deals with claims more than $10,000, initially needs to be brought in a court of claims.

Oral argument — Rexnord Industries, LLC v. Habasit Belting Incorporated

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 3, 2015

And the third point is that, let me check my notes here, it eases cleaning, which I guess is somewhat associated with reduction of turbulence, but as you're wanting to clean either the belt or the items … Cross commented that there was a withholding of a reference, Ensch, during original prosecution.

Oral argument — Balfour Beatty Construction, LLC v. GSA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 4, 2025

The report, the geotechnical report said the water is clean enough to drink. Well, it wasn't clean enough to drink. … If it's in the brief, it's fine for public comment and publishing, Your Honor.

Oral argument — Pipes v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 5, 2019

Was he required to fill out certain forms at the completion of the training period? He was filling out the forms. … Carson, the Air Force board doctor, says that the Air Force did do less than desirable medical treatment of this individual. But what about the points or pay argument the government made?

Oral argument — Bebley v. Air Force

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 10, 2019

Air Force 14-12-21 Bebley v. Air Force 14-12-21 Bebley v. Air Force May it please the Court, I am here representing Mr. … By keeping it out of the board record because of the possible prejudicial effect, the Air Force admits that it could be prejudicial. The Air Force provided the whole case file to Mr.

Oral argument — Bader v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 7, 2024

If he was acting clearly, when he was acting clearly in his role as a civilian and not invoking his rank, his authority, instructing, you know, invoking his power of his military office, then he was not … Counsel, 207C deals with a one-year cooling off period. Is that right? And am I correct in understanding that that issue was not being appealed? It was conceded? That's correct.

Oral argument — Ministerio Roca Solida v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 9, 2015

But the Tucker Act... You've got another 10 seconds. Sure. The Tucker Act is available for a six-year period. Thank you. I extend Mr. Becker's time to a total of five minutes. … And even with the Clean Water Act violation, is we take a procedural to process problems. So thank you for your time.

Oral argument — WBIP, LLC v. Kohler Co.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 3, 2015

So the air, at least as described, for example, in the WBIP patents, the air and the fuel are combined in the combustion engine. … So you don't want to return to the gist or heart of the invention notion from the Pre-52 Patent Act? No, no, it's not a gist issue. What was the secondary considerations?

Oral argument — Luminara Worldwide, LLC v. Iancu

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 5, 2018

In this case, the voluntary dismissal didn't occur, as I understand it, until the one-year period had actually run. That's correct. … And there's nothing also to show, so Luminara argues that it affects the air resistance. There's nothing about how it affects the air resistance. All that the specification says is...

Oral argument — Adair v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 10, 2007

You can circulate the air. I mean, there are lots of mechanical things you could do. That's not what EPA says. … How bad, how thick the smoke is, how rich the toxins in the air are. Absolutely.

Oral argument — HSUAN-YEH CHANG v. REA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 11, 2013

If you run a restaurant, you need a lot of licenses, for example, like a cleanness license, a fire license, sometimes a liquor license. … But can you take away a cleanness license when the restaurant does not comply with fire license regulations? No.

Oral argument — Asghari-Kamrani v. United Services Automobile

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 5, 2018

Because it would have at least cleaned up a lot of this stuff. Your Honor, that's an excellent question. What I can tell the court is that USAA seriously considered that. … Meinstad had acted as lead counsel the entire period of the case and had gone on far too long and that if the court had disqualified him, there would have been an even longer delay that would have prejudiced

Oral argument — City of Wilmington, Delaware v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 7, 2023

This is a Clean Water Act case. The Supreme Court held in Consolo v. Federal Maritime Commission that without specific statutory authorization, de novo review is generally not to be presumed. … And that's why the trial court correctly found that those charges were not reasonable service charges under the Clean Water Act. Let me put it another way.

Oral argument — In Re Wycech

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 9, 2023

is delivered to the mold and it is that added steam or hot air that acts as a binder. … I'd like to just make one clarification in response to the comment about Kaleska's paragraph about the water, there not being too much water, so that granular beads don't stick together, and that's in