Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
2,676 results
0.10s
Oral argument — American Aviation Supply v. Illinois Department of Revenue
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 15, 2024
Air purchased fuel in Illinois from American Aviation Supply. … But if the statute is ambiguous, the legislative history simply states one lone senator's comment about the statute.
49 min of audioOral argument — Petermeyer v. The Workers' Compensation Commission
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 23, 2021
And Miss Latham, she's the one who wrote the comment about he is not employable or he's not likely to return to his job. I have it here. … He has he has an associate's degree in refrigeration and air conditioning and a college certificate in construction management.
34 min of audioOral argument — People v. Granter
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 17, 2011
But how do we know that these acts occurred after? All right. Well, the indictment charged, as to TW, a course of sexual abuse over a two-year period until April 29th of 2007. … And I submit to you the Taylor case is premised on the proposition that the acts, at least one of the acts, against both victims is very, very similar. That isn't the case here.
42 min of audioOral argument — Flynn v. Town of Normal
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 24, 2018
So they're talking about the change in doing those things or the failure to do those things after a period of time. … We're not plucking intended and permitted out of the air for tax purposes or something.
47 min of audioOral argument — Hall v. Delatte
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 16, 2017
For a short period of time, they did. … She did move back in with him for a period of time, but that agreement was read into the record.
34 min of audioOral argument — Dave v. Schmitz
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 20, 2019
And that's an affirmative act by ISP. What about simply the continued existence of the individual's name on the registry? We're talking about the act of expungement. … And maintaining the database means removing names from the database after the 10-year period has expired. Or after their period that requires them to continue reporting has expired, right?
43 min of audioOral argument — Smith v. Ill. Dept. of Natural Resources
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 5, 2015
of this act, the Administrative Procedures Act. … Finally, I would add that the department answered no, that it did not use any studies to begin with, but that during the first notice period and looking at the comments, they decided they did need to look
46 min of audioOral argument — Peverelle v. Workers' Compensation Comm'n
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 22, 2017
Now, there's a litany of cases in the state of Illinois which say that a claimant's testimony alone may be sufficient to support an award of benefits under the Act so long as the weight of the evidence … Pepperell is entitled to DTD for the entire period from January 8, 2013 to May 30, 2014 because the condition had not stabilized and she was unable to work during that period. Thank you, Your Honor.
16 min of audioOral argument — Channell v. Tittsworth
Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 28, 2019
So the defendant didn't identify by name the individuals who were the subject of these allegedly defamatory comments. … I don't think it was something indicating that the action where they went to the state attorney may have been more involved in the Criminal Information Act violations, the Open Meetings Act violations
27 min of audioOral argument — Porada v. Lavelle
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 11, 2018
The illegal, her comment about illegal refers to A and B. … I think the exact language is something to the effect that it was dismissed pursuant to the Act, that is the what we'll call the Citizens Participatory Act, and alternatively under 2615.
53 min of audioOral argument — First American Bank v. Poplar Creek
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 30, 2024
We also go back to looking at the comments. … There's a critical time period issue here during which the Poplar Creek development was viable.
52 min of audioOral argument — Iannoni v. City of Chicago
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 18, 2019
It does not serve the purpose of the Act, which is to compensate injured workers for their injuries. To pay this out over time when the employer knows what its liability is. Pay the award, period. … This award should be paid, period. There's no installment plan in the workers' compact.
55 min of audioOral argument — People v. Demers
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 6, 2015
What they heard was anywhere as little as only three specific acts for the 12-count complaint, and the way that the complaint was framed was one act of aggravated criminal sexual abuse over a six-month … period.
26 min of audioOral argument — Miller v. MacMurray College
Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 10, 2011
Well, I wasn't really the attorney for a part period of time early on in this case. Mr. Lahr was and he had withdrawn. … So we don't know whether a student signs up at McMurray College or any college and pays $5,000 for a course, they just have bought air? Let me give an example.
46 min of audioOral argument — In re Appointment of the Special Prosecutor
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 21, 2017
Whether they wave the flag of 7.1a in the air or simply say we have a court order, does that make a difference? It does. The burden is on them to prove their exemption claims. … And I think Judge Mitchell got it right, and I guess I'll just segue just a few comments on Judge Truman's discretion.
67 min of audioOral argument — Next Energy, LLC v. Dept. of Natural Resources
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 15, 2020
Then there were so-called public comments. Now, if you look at what the Act and the regs say, the public comments are to be submitted by those who will be affected by the issuance of the permit. … And they accepted those comments, and among other things, among the other comments they accepted, they directed Mr. Woolsey to respond to those comments.
47 min of audioOral argument — Marriage of Williams
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 16, 2025
Ultimately, the court entered an order pursuant to Section 607.5 of the Illinois Marriage and Dissolution of Marriage Act. … And I'll leave you with one comment. Why is that?
46 min of audioOral argument — Consolidation Coal Co. v. The Workers' Compensation Commission
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 26, 2010
So we're dealing with a 15-month period as opposed to an almost five-year period. … And in the single reference to the word symptoms, the only comments are that they were real and that they improved capillary function. In other words, the commission took that into account.
29 min of audioOral argument — Interstate Trucks v. State of Illinois
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 11, 2011
Period. There anything else you have to do, right? Well, in terms of trip permits or licenses or anything. Correct. … And you wouldn't have to buy any license under the Apportionment Act either.
41 min of audioOral argument — Travnicek v. Awalt
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 28, 2011
Well, had she not gone to DCFS, she'd be accused of not acting to protect her children. … Well, had she not gone to DCFS, she'd be accused of not acting to protect her children.
64 min of audio
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.