Documents

Oral argument — Southern Appalachian Mountain v. Red River Coal Company, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 8, 2020

The Clean Water Act is point source. … Would the Clean Water Act permit in that circumstance cover the pollution in state standards? Both SMACRA and the Clean Water Act. No, no. Under the Clean Water Act. Under the Clean Water Act.

Oral argument — Country Mutual Insurance Co. v. Bible Pork, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 2, 2015

T that already occurred for brought into the land act Here we have a clerical ju the clerical connection i procedure, not of substan act is a statute of subst harm and remedies allow u act depending on … Was be were by injunction saying money to clean up what's or you got to reimburse u done to clean up of what that occurred, damaging t our situation at all.

Oral argument — Waddoups v. Air Force

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 7, 2006

does have delegated authority, and then you'd have to figure out the scope of his delegated authority, the nature of his discretion, whether his discretion is broad, whether there's any remedy if he acts … He hadn't said that before to a supervisor, to a supervisor who had, in fact, been responsive about finding a treatment facility within the period permitted.

Oral argument — Darek Kitlinski v. DOJ

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 10, 2020

Let's say that Derek was not – it's just a matter of geography and convenience that Derek was located in Washington, D.C. during this time period. … Air Force. This is a case where Mr.

Oral argument — Curiel v. The County of Contra

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 15, 2009

And oh, by the way, as to your comment about probable cause, Judge Alsop spent a great about how there was probable cause, and you, Your Honor, just brought up this morning. … They had – the facts are that within a very short period of time that they arrived at the house, they knew the person they were looking for wasn't there. They had information.

Oral argument — Gary Pelican v. 3M Company

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2026

Employee Transfer Corporation to explain that, quote, when a plaintiff acts reasonably to discover the cause of a problem, the prescriptive period does not begin to run until he has a reasonable basis … I also agree with Judge Grander's comment. The Pelican case is particularly easy because the unfiled claims spreadsheet came more than a year before his lawsuit was filed.

Oral argument — 1010 Lake Shore Association v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 24, 2015

And again, there are three comments, and all three are cited in the 1010 case. And again, although the comments vary a little bit, all three have the same underlying intention. … So to add this language didn't clean up or confirm, excuse me, something that already happened. It was added, I think, for a purpose.

Oral argument — Nesvacil v. Kochiu

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 11, 2017

Tamarazzi testified that all that he did is, the anesthesiologists are on call for a certain period of time, they can't work days on end. Dr. … They don't know because after the delivery, the baby was struggling and had to be air-flighted to Carl Foundation Hospital in Havana.

Oral argument — Atrium Medical Center v. HHS

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 5, 2013

You need to go and challenge that through the notice of rulemaking and commenting period. You need to submit comments during the rulemaking period. … The same way with this irregular short-term disability act. Nothing that specific was promulgated.

Oral argument — United States v. Alisqa Water

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 13, 2005

And why isn't this situation more like that, that there is concurrent jurisdiction in both EPA and whatever the state has to do to enforce the provisions of the Clean Water Act, but that the enforcement … And regardless of how this issue resolves itself, there's independent bases for the court to have taken that, and there's cases in the Ninth Circuit, Clean Air Act cases, that deal with that 1345 independent

Oral argument — Avaya Inc v. Telecom Labs

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 20, 2016

are entitled to a new trial even as to the prior period. … First of all, it's not the holding of either Queen City or Harrison Air, and it's not the implication of either Queen City or Harrison Air. Starting with Harrison Air, hold just a moment.

Oral argument — Morgan v. USDC for AZ

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 20, 2007

And I also think that if Your Honor's rule, as we ask you to, that Judge Martone should be given the opportunity to start from a clean slate on future cases. … You know, the odd thing, too, is that we're, of course, you're here on mandamus, and the burden is so high on mandamus and clear air of the law and so forth.

Oral argument — United States v. CITGO Petroleum Corporation

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 9, 2015

Well, it's during the period of the violation, yes, sir. The period of the violation is alleged to be 94 to May of 2000. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I thought they said something about 50% at some time. … What they explained in their final version was that they weren't going to narrow it in response to comments. But then they created a separate deal for equalization tanks.

Oral argument — QATAR INTL TRADING v. AIR FORCE

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 2, 2011

of that eight-month period. … Just very brief comments. On the last point, we agree that U.S. law applies. I'm not aware of any statute that a service provider cannot charge the user of a telephone for cloned services.

Oral argument — Continental Casualty Co. v. 401 North Wabash Venture

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 2, 2023

That is defined as a pollutant under the Clean Water Act. So you're conceding that what you put back in is a pollutant. Correct. Okay. I understand. … And that's subject to a whole nother set of regulations within the Clean Water Act about how high is the temperature? What impact will that have on the environment?

Oral argument — Bissonnette v. LePage Bakeries Park St., LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 20, 2024

So it has trucks traveling across the highway, it has planes in the air. … Act.

Oral argument — Phillips v. City of Belleville

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 17, 2013

Phillips had to clean up the property. And it hasn't since this time been cleaned up. … in accordance with statute and whether or not the City of Belleville is entitled to Tour Immunity Act.

Oral argument — United States v. Rishi Shah

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 10, 2026

And Gligoyevich, actually, the same comment that the court said, the instructions were otherwise unexceptionable. … And that would be completely contrary to principles of plain air and rule 12. So that's the preservation side.

Oral argument — Braintree Laboratories, Inc. v. Novel Laboratories, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 4, 2014

Our argument is driven by patent law, which says that when a patentee acts as its own lexicographer— And you're saying that Collins, too, he said they define clinically significant, right? … Okay, but so it says may be divided and administered to the patient in two or more administrations over an appropriate period of time.

Oral argument — Bartlett v. Honeywell Internat

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 30, 2018

Right, I'm just going to say that there can be some confusion based on the fact that there were plaintiffs during the notice and comment period who were challenging various aspects of the consent decree … During the period of dredging operations, there has been no evidence of adverse impacts to human health.