Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
5,768 results
0.37s
Oral argument — United States v. Rhonda Liddle
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 11, 2014
And that cleans up a lot of the issues, doesn't it? There's no improper use of a conspiracy conviction even if there was an improper conspiracy conviction. … You may also find that the defendant, Rhonda Little, acted knowingly if you find beyond a reasonable doubt that.
24 min of audioOral argument — Sun Pacific Marketing Coop v. DiMare Fresh
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 15, 2015
And in the longer period, there's no ---- How long do you think the period has to be? I mean, it could last 10 days. … And Sun Pacific's right under that contract with an act of God was to cease shipping. That's what the act of God said. It's an unusual act of God clause, but that's what its remedy was.
26 min of audioOral argument — Joel Alcox v. Jeffrey Beard
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 20, 2014
Let me get back to this first period, though. … The reaction, the initial comments of Lothery that he acted surprised in some. And Lothery is very crafty. And it was apparent from evidence that Lothery knew that they were being monitored.
44 min of audioOral argument — Zhou v. Gonzales
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 13, 2005
That's not a clean statement. It is. It isn't before you, Your Honor. … Narrowly speaking, the court could deny the petition on sufficiency of the evidence, period.
41 min of audioOral argument — Brown v. Alaska Airlines, Inc.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 22, 2025
Alaska posted the Equality Act, which was about providing rights to the LGBTQ community, which she could have commented on, whether she was in support or not in support of that act. … We have Joe Sprague, who was the president of Horizon Air. He made a number of religious-based comments in response to Alaska's support for the Equality Act. No disciplinary action taken against him.
42 min of audioOral argument — Center for Biological Diversit v. USFS
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 7, 2018
Was the Forest Service, you know, it's Forest Service land, so is there some imputed obligation to clean it up? Is that, because it's your land? … Manufacturers of dry cleaning equipment. Right. If I said that, I was wrong. I didn't mean to say that. Okay. So what do you want to say about Honeywell then?
46 min of audioOral argument — Kevin Waine-Golston v. Time Warner-Advance/Newhouse
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 3, 2015
Well, you don't disagree that rounding on a neutral basis is permitted under both California law and the Fair Labor Standards Act? No, your honor, we disagree. … Counsel, the other side gave us the impression that the judge just picked this out of the air and it came out of nowhere. No, sir, not at all.
35 min of audioOral argument — Ron Williams v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 19, 2009
Well, obviously, Your Honor, he was very good at his job because he received a positive performance evaluation and had a clean record up to this point. So what good is he? … Any act that an employee does that brings discredit upon the department, which obviously drinking in a department vehicle, which is what the other cases they say are different, none of these people, well
19 min of audioOral argument — Alliance for the Wild Rockies v. Leanne Marten
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 10, 2019
Disturbance effects would be short-term and insignificant, period. That's the whole discussion. That's true. … This use will be spread over a significant period. It will not be 48 hours back-to-back.
39 min of audioOral argument — OBOT v. City of Oakland
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 12, 2019
The first, though, if I might be permitted to respond to Judge Pearsall's last comment, Your Honor, and then address yours. May I? Yeah. … The ordinance was a legislative act by the city council, and the resolution was essentially an adjudicatory act.
41 min of audioOral argument — 50341 USA v. Mercado
Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 5, 2004
So with those comments, I would submit. All right. Thank you, Counsel. If you may please the Court, Fred Rowley, Jr. for the United States. … But again, what the special verdict asked the jury to answer was whether the defendants were guilty of racketeering acts. And those racketeering acts themselves were charged offenses.
22 min of audioOral argument — Singh v. Mukasey
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 11, 2008
Fired in the air. Fired in the air, he says in the previous paragraph. And later he says, fired at my restaurant and put it on fire. … of firing guns at an unknown place and then committing an act of arson.
17 min of audioOral argument — Singh v. Mukasey
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 11, 2008
Fired in the air. Fired in the air, he says in the previous paragraph. And later he says fired at my restaurant and put it on fire. … of firing guns at an unknown place and then committing an act of arson.
17 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Joe Reyes, Jr.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 2, 2009
If it's ambiguous, you've got a terrible plain air problem, don't you? Well, nevertheless, if there's air, there's air. … And those are all the comments I have, unless the court has questions of me. Let me ask you to focus, going back to the question of whether the counselor categorical approach applies.
20 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Robert Manning
Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 19, 2024
The racketeering acts, the specific five racketeering acts, could not be considered to determine whether Mr. Coates acted with an enterprise purpose. … Simmons meant to air it out. He said that that was disrespectful and threatening.
46 min of audioOral argument — Arizumi v. Vail Resorts
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 7, 2003
They came from Hawaii and they go to, say, Michigan and they go into a pool that's not properly cleaned, or they trip and fall down the stairs at the hotel. … I believe that it's still it's our point is they acted as a travel agent.
25 min of audioOral argument — Daniel Godoy-Ramirez v. Eric Holder, Jr.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 6, 2015
As I understand your comments just now, it's that, in fact, extraordinary circumstances have been demonstrated. So now that would give rise to an exhaustion problem. … And then another incident, a man brandished a gun, shot it in the air, yelled, I'm going to kill you faggots.
31 min of audioOral argument — Teradyne, Inc. v. Astronics Test Systems, Inc.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 16, 2025
These are each separate works because they were created at different times by different authors over a period of time to do different things. … Baer's declaration, paragraph 279, that's on 7ER1369, he talks about the fact that the Air Force already uses a wrapper.
32 min of audioOral argument — Kott v. Rumsfeld
Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 13, 2003
Abrams acted inappropriately toward children. And Ms. Henry's response both times was, First, she said, Who are you, a man, to make this decision? … She was terminated for having, during the probationary period, for having a negative attitude about the program and about not being able to follow the rules of the program.
46 min of audioOral argument — SCRHA v. County of San Diego
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 9, 2022
The State Emergency Act authorizes the county regulation, but we also have the Brown Act and the open meetings laws that require counties to agendize, provide notice, and opportunity for public comment … I think that's a Brown Act requirement.
34 min of audio
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.