Documents

Oral argument — Svec v. Retirement Board of the Policemen's Annuity & Benefit Fund

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 19, 2025

She continued to work for a period. She went off for a period after that due to an unrelated injury. This was not the cause of her disability. … I echo Justice Reyes's comments, both of you gentlemen. Very good presentation. Thank you.

Oral argument — First American Bank v. Poplar Creek

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 30, 2024

We also go back to looking at the comments. … There's a critical time period issue here during which the Poplar Creek development was viable.

Oral argument — Next Energy, LLC v. Dept. of Natural Resources

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 15, 2020

Then there were so-called public comments. Now, if you look at what the Act and the regs say, the public comments are to be submitted by those who will be affected by the issuance of the permit. … And they accepted those comments, and among other things, among the other comments they accepted, they directed Mr. Woolsey to respond to those comments.

Oral argument — Mullen v. Peoples

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 1, 2010

For what period of time would it have been told? It was a very short period of time. Yes, it was about five weeks. His birthday was August 14th, and the complaint had been filed June 24th. … And in Hatchett, although in the end this court reversed the granting of the 103B motion, in Hatchett the committee comments concerning the rule were noted, and the committee comments talked about the

Oral argument — Peverelle v. Workers' Compensation Comm'n

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 22, 2017

Now, there's a litany of cases in the state of Illinois which say that a claimant's testimony alone may be sufficient to support an award of benefits under the Act so long as the weight of the evidence … Pepperell is entitled to DTD for the entire period from January 8, 2013 to May 30, 2014 because the condition had not stabilized and she was unable to work during that period. Thank you, Your Honor.

Oral argument — Smith v. Ill. Dept. of Natural Resources

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 5, 2015

of this act, the Administrative Procedures Act. … Finally, I would add that the department answered no, that it did not use any studies to begin with, but that during the first notice period and looking at the comments, they decided they did need to look

Oral argument — Estate of Thurman

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 6, 2022

But she had in front of her several documents that she had to sign in a very short period of time, did she not. … It's depriving the party of its right to the fees under the Nursing Home Act.

Oral argument — American Aviation Supply v. Illinois Department of Revenue

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 15, 2024

Air purchased fuel in Illinois from American Aviation Supply. … But if the statute is ambiguous, the legislative history simply states one lone senator's comment about the statute.

Oral argument — Olin Corporation v. The Workers' Compensation Commission

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 28, 2010

However, Justice, you referred to Section 10 of the Act, and Section 10 of the Act does apply in this case, and Section 10 of the Act says that that overtime is to be excluded unless it is part of a set … I just simply want to respond to counsel's opening comment about Mr. Hall's testimony.

Oral argument — Iannoni v. City of Chicago

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 18, 2019

It does not serve the purpose of the Act, which is to compensate injured workers for their injuries. To pay this out over time when the employer knows what its liability is. Pay the award, period. … This award should be paid, period. There's no installment plan in the workers' compact.

Oral argument — Hadley v. Subscriber Doe

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 21, 2014

The specific comments underneath that story had absolutely nothing to do with each other. In other words, not only was the comment about Mr. … , Communications Decency Act, I think it's CDC.

Oral argument — 1-19-1378

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 15, 2021

relevant part, it is unlawful for a person to knowingly possess on or about his person or on his land or in his own abode or fixed place of business, any weapon prohibited under section 24-1 of this act … It was literally one of the public defender's first comments in her closing arguments that the state had alleged it was an abode and they'd failed to prove so. That is prejudice in and of itself.

Oral argument — Dave v. Schmitz

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 20, 2019

And that's an affirmative act by ISP. What about simply the continued existence of the individual's name on the registry? We're talking about the act of expungement. … And maintaining the database means removing names from the database after the 10-year period has expired. Or after their period that requires them to continue reporting has expired, right?

Oral argument — Sperl v. C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 19, 2011

We could have shipped this by air. We could have shipped this intermodal. We could have shipped this by rail. We could have shipped it by boat. But those are our choices. … We are not acting as agents for our customer. You're a jewel. We are acting as the principle here. Fines, Dan Henry did not know about the fines. She was prepared to drive with or without the fines.

Oral argument — People v. Taylor

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 27, 2016

Just what is it in the testimony, in the evidence, that would lead a reasonable person to conclude that the defendant saw that and reasonably believed he had to act in the way he acted? … Furthermore, there's no doubt that Taylor was acting under a sudden and intense passion.

Oral argument — Coal City Redi-Mix Company v. Pontiac Exchange, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 26, 2014

The pawnbroker, usually on a fairly short-term basis, as in this case, I believe the redemption period of the transaction was made September 17th. The redemption period was October 17th. … Well, Justice Schmidt commented that if there's a good faith arm's length transaction, that their due process rights should be allowed.

Oral argument — Tindle v. Barakat

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 15, 2018

I think counsel's comment was he doesn't think the case, Medical Studies Act case should turn on an issue like that. … And by policy, her job then was to send this to two experts for comment and record the comments and then give her comments in a submission to the committee, who then began their investigation with all

Oral argument — Flynn v. Town of Normal

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 24, 2018

So they're talking about the change in doing those things or the failure to do those things after a period of time. … We're not plucking intended and permitted out of the air for tax purposes or something.

Oral argument — People v. Ritchey

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 22, 2020

we lay out three main areas the first area i'd really like to cover is the ineffective assistance of counsel that standard has been heavily um uh you know law on that the strickland case it's a plain air … a prosecution there's never been a trial there's never been a conviction um it's all basically i'm saying this happened i didn't say that it happened at the time that it occurred there's been a long period

Oral argument — People v. Demers

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 6, 2015

What they heard was anywhere as little as only three specific acts for the 12-count complaint, and the way that the complaint was framed was one act of aggravated criminal sexual abuse over a six-month … period.