Documents

Oral argument — United States v. Susan Tomsha-Miguel

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 14, 2014

So this Court is looking at it from a plein air perspective. The most likely reason he didn't object in real time is because the comments, when read in context, are completely appropriate and proper. … under a plein air standard.

Oral argument — Narviez Alexander v. State of Nevada

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 9, 2015

Fourth, none of the tests, neither the oxygen saturation nor the persistent oxygen tests that were provided over a long period of time, evidenced any type of a problem. … During his comments, now keep in mind, he had been at Lovelock for over two months when this conversation transpired.

Oral argument — Mendoza v. Holder

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 6, 2009

Well, fortunately, Your Honor, we have the Real ID Act, which explicitly preserves this Court's jurisdiction for constitutional claims. … This is not the kind of case where we look and find inappropriate comments by the immigration judge.

Oral argument — Butte Environmental Council v. USACE

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 11, 2010

Then the Corps provides the public notice about the, about the application and asks for comments on it. … But the EPA, in the comments on, I believe it was the supplemental EIS, the EPA said, yes, we acknowledge you did something, but it's clearly not enough to satisfy the requirements of the Clean Water Act

Oral argument — Donald Davis v. American States Insurance Comp

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 11, 2013

Council, let me direct you to a different part of D, additional coverage collapse, and ask for your comments on that. … Is to replace that part of the roof and clean up the junk that fell in. Exactly.

Oral argument — Daisy Alvarez v. Sheraton Operating Corporation

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 8, 2021

So most of the defendant's motion there was really a way to clean up the scope of the plaintiff's pleadings so that the case could proceed forward on appropriate claims. … they did after that were acts inconsistent with that right.

Oral argument — USW v. ConocoPhillips Company

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 4, 2009

Any comments on that? All right. Thank you. Thank you, Your Honors. My name is Ann Richardson. … Safety Clean. And the Conoco in this matter has this case exactly reversed because actually Sequeiros and Perez are still good law.

Oral argument — United States v. Calderon

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 23, 2006

Well, that's impeaching him of prior acts of conduct, showing a character and acts consistent with the character seems to me to be character evidence, not impeachment testimony. … All you're entitled to show is a prior conviction of a felony and name the felony, period.

Oral argument — United States v. Minter

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 3, 2003

There was some argument made that WAC, the Western Air Couriers, owned the asset. … Then he used the girlfriend's money, fraudulently obtained, to purchase, to start up Western Air Couriers and purchase the assets of Pegasus Air, and affected that transaction by which he undertook some

Oral argument — Camacho v. Ashcroft

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 3, 2003

So you have to clean that up before we'll give you your credit card or whatever it was. OK. Ready? May it please the Court. … However, in 1996, Congress passed the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act, commonly referred to as IHRA-IHRA. IHRA-IHRA changed the rules for suspension of deportation.

Oral argument — United States v. Andre Franklin

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 11, 2017

The government's position is that it acted in accordance with the terms of the plea agreement. … But even if you could, I'd suggest the proper plein air analysis is this. Is the air obvious? I think it is obvious.

Oral argument — John Ferguson v. FAA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 9, 2009

One of the things the Court already alluded to is the fact that this action arises under the Administrative Procedure Act. Even the Administrative Procedure Act must contemplate a fair hearing. … Absolutely clean up to that point. Absolutely clean. Guy has an ATP. He's flown charter jets around the world. He's flown helicopters. He's a very accomplished pilot. He's almost as good as I am.

Oral argument — Jorge Rojas v. FAA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 6, 2018

It's not like a Federal Tort Claims Act case. … That's my first comment. I guess it's not a question, but it's really concerning to me. I understand.

Oral argument — Sun Pacific Marketing Coop v. DiMare Fresh

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 15, 2015

And in the longer period, there's no ---- How long do you think the period has to be? I mean, it could last 10 days. … And Sun Pacific's right under that contract with an act of God was to cease shipping. That's what the act of God said. It's an unusual act of God clause, but that's what its remedy was.

Oral argument — Center for Biological Diversit v. USFS

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 7, 2018

Was the Forest Service, you know, it's Forest Service land, so is there some imputed obligation to clean it up? Is that, because it's your land? … Manufacturers of dry cleaning equipment. Right. If I said that, I was wrong. I didn't mean to say that. Okay. So what do you want to say about Honeywell then?

Oral argument — Ron Williams v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 19, 2009

Well, obviously, Your Honor, he was very good at his job because he received a positive performance evaluation and had a clean record up to this point. So what good is he? … Any act that an employee does that brings discredit upon the department, which obviously drinking in a department vehicle, which is what the other cases they say are different, none of these people, well

Oral argument — Alliance for the Wild Rockies v. Leanne Marten

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 10, 2019

Disturbance effects would be short-term and insignificant, period. That's the whole discussion. That's true. … This use will be spread over a significant period. It will not be 48 hours back-to-back.

Oral argument — 50341 USA v. Mercado

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 5, 2004

So with those comments, I would submit. All right. Thank you, Counsel. If you may please the Court, Fred Rowley, Jr. for the United States. … But again, what the special verdict asked the jury to answer was whether the defendants were guilty of racketeering acts. And those racketeering acts themselves were charged offenses.

Oral argument — United States v. Joe Reyes, Jr.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 2, 2009

If it's ambiguous, you've got a terrible plain air problem, don't you? Well, nevertheless, if there's air, there's air. … And those are all the comments I have, unless the court has questions of me. Let me ask you to focus, going back to the question of whether the counselor categorical approach applies.

Oral argument — Precise Aerospace Mfg., Inc. v. MAG Aerospace Industries, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 13, 2019

In addition to that comment, there was statements of offensive conduct regarding further harassment and bullying telephone calls to Ms. Abde after the balls on the table comment. … That amendment put forth additional factual allegations, which, assuming the original allegations were not sufficient to support the UNDER Act claim, would support the UNDER Act claim.