Documents

Oral argument — People v. Mitchell

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 25, 2018

Separated into two time periods, right? Correct. Okay. … Also, I wanted to mention that the, sorry, it's not as if this video contained one inadmissible comment. This video contained many, many, many, many inadmissible comments.

Oral argument — Wisniewski v. Diocese of Belleville

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 1, 2010

period. … In fact, the 2003 amendments to the Child Sexual Abuse Act rectify that comment in Clay because they specifically said that knowledge of the abuse does not constitute discovery of the injury or the causal

Oral argument — Kuykendall v. Schneidewind

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 9, 2016

And moreover, regarding that, that aspect, it's plaintiff's burden to the appellate, as the appellant here, to provide this Court with a record sufficiently complete to permit review of the air complaint … I appreciate your comment. Now, here the trial court did not err in dismissing the matter, correct, with prejudice as to all three defendants under 619.

Oral argument — Tonellato v. Mrasak

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 19, 2014

Can you comment on this issue of which 20-year period the court can look at? … Sure, I'll be happy to comment on that.

Oral argument — Yessenow v. Executive Risk Indemnity, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 25, 2011

treatment of the proceeds of the policies, which the plaintiffs here seek with respect to the defense of the underlying Abrams 1 action, and the policy itself, which is the property, I put highlighted or air … In I believe every case in that circumstance, the policy period was over before the bankruptcy was commenced.

Oral argument — People v. Rish

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 2, 2020

In that instance, she could raise as a factor in mitigation, the fact that her husband had abused her for a period of time, and she was under the threat of serious physical harm, were she not to ride in … She is adding some evidence that there were other people in her life that committed acts of domestic violence. I think she refers to her father. She refers to her former boyfriend.

Oral argument — People v. Kidd

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 1, 2014

The courts are clear that the Domestic Violence Act was intended to protect intimate relationships, not merely social, casual, or business acquaintances. … We will take comment under advisement, and this court stands in recess until tomorrow. All rise.

Oral argument — People v. Connor

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 29, 2015

And I think it's like one of the comments made is like no comment I've ever seen before by a trial judge. … Show me that you didn't have it for the entire time period.

Oral argument — Garvy v. Seyfarth Shaw LLP

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 9, 2012

Didn't he go so far as to say it would act as his detriment? Yes, he did. … And actually, the current comments to Rule 1.7 talk about various situations where conflicts are non-consentable.

Oral argument — People v. Puckett

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 25, 2012

And why doesn't this require a charge of domestic violence so that we're not pulling harassment of sorts out of the air? Or you're arguing he was talking loudly and Mr. … It was not, the trial court did not rely on that act as an act of harassment.

Oral argument — Burns v. Delta Airlines

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 20, 2021

So I think there's roughly three pay periods in that time period. So it's around, and the last one was in the full amount, so it's about $20,000. … Well, if you said there are three pay periods, why isn't it $30,000? Because the final pay period, they deducted at the 65%. I see. Any other questions?

Oral argument — Roxana Community School v. WRB Refining

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 11, 2012

And the language of the Open Meetings Act with regard to public comment does not say that members of the public must be allowed to stand up and verbally make comments at every meeting of every public body … Judge Schmidt drafted an order as narrowly as he could to prevent further violations of the Act by the Pollution Control Board in the matters raised by this complaint, and he did so for a very short period

Oral argument — West Suburban Bank v. Advantage Financial Partners, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 1, 2014

You still have the period of—here, I'm drawing a blank on it there—the period of redemption, the period of reinstatement, and you still have the notice of sale. … I went and looked up the definitions for the Private Detective Act. And the Private Detective Act has a whole series of definitions for a private detective agency.

Oral argument — General Motors Corporation v. The Motor Vehicle Review Board

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 14, 2013

It says it shall be an unfair act or practice to grant an additional franchise in a market. Period. So had you granted a franchise without going through the hoops, that would be better. Absolutely. … But not just if anything, it's not just in the air, devoid from any connection whatsoever. Let's just take the word consent order, Your Honor.

Oral argument — People v. Rushing

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 13, 2018

And the other factor is that there was propensity evidence, prior acts of abuse in both of those cases. … We really don't even know the time period between her last period of consciousness and her discovering that the door was open. So there simply isn't any evidence about why he left.

Oral argument — People v. Schag

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 1, 2010

I never thought about anything like that because the jury told them we're deadlocked, period. That's what he knew. That's what the judge knew. They were deadlocked, period, to infinity. … They were egregious, colorful comments.

Oral argument — People ex rel. R & D Olson Limited Partnership v. Village of Glendale Heights

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 19, 2013

At that point in time, then, Bloomingdale, their petitions would then come to have significance and could then be acted upon. Certainly, after the time period of 60 days having expired. … Judge, based on, based on the fact, and could you just, if I could briefly comment on justification? Quickly.

Oral argument — City of Calumet City v. Workers' Compensation Commission Embrey

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 20, 2014

Can I comment on, you're giving us a very long, detailed history. You're challenging the second period of TTD when it commenced, correct? Yes. Isn't that what you're, and Dr. … The reason why I raise that is we have a case that says the Act only authorizes penalties for nonpayment of compensation. It does not authorize penalties for anything else.

Oral argument — People v. Gallard

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 29, 2016

Isn't this also consistent with our defendant here just firing into the air, just firing into the sky? … Third, as far as this being a premeditated act, again, it's sort of besides the point. We don't know what the intended act was. Was it to kill? Was it to scare? Was it to hurt?

Oral argument — Porada v. Lavelle

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 11, 2018

The illegal, her comment about illegal refers to A and B. … I think the exact language is something to the effect that it was dismissed pursuant to the Act, that is the what we'll call the Citizens Participatory Act, and alternatively under 2615.