Documents

Oral argument — Jill Thornsberry v. Carolyn W. Colvin

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 5, 2013

The appellant was very vague in describing her past work history, acted with a mild air of indifference about the entire examination proceedings, and the doctor found that her complaints appeared disproportionate … So the period because we are discussing... What period are we discussing? 208 to... I don't know the date of the subsequent... About three years. About three years. So we're talking $36,000.

Oral argument — Delil v. Point Reyes

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 5, 2007

Even the comments to Rule 54-C of the local rules provides that the parties should be aware that the time is short. … There is no order in this case, period.

Oral argument — Citizens for Clean Energy v. National Mining Association

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 6, 2024

Mineral Leasing Act. … Those are the same factors, royalty rates, carbon budgeting, things that go beyond simple air or climate effects.

Oral argument — David Diaz-Jimenez v. Jefferson Sessions

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 17, 2017

It says, any alien who is a stowaway is inadmissible, period. Nice and clear. … So— So if I'm a homeowner employing somebody to take care of my children or to clean my house, and they're not— If you're— Do I have to ask for an I-9?

Oral argument — United States v. Ameyalli Escamilla-Rojas

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 16, 2011

And so really the system got tired of having to clean up all this stuff. And they said, just doggone it, just tell them what these rights are, make sure up front rather than clean up everything. … And at one point the judge specifically commented on that. Let me see if I can find that real quick for you. Counsel, I'm sure we can find it in the record. Yeah.

Oral argument — United States v. Rhonda Liddle

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 11, 2014

And that cleans up a lot of the issues, doesn't it? There's no improper use of a conspiracy conviction even if there was an improper conspiracy conviction. … You may also find that the defendant, Rhonda Little, acted knowingly if you find beyond a reasonable doubt that.

Oral argument — Tamara Diaz v. Kubler Corporation

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 7, 2015

Diaz as the plaintiff who's claiming a statutory right not to pay interest, period. She's not claiming that the debt is not owed. Is that correct? … At least when I have my teeth cleaned, I pay it before I leave the dentist's office, right? A little better relation with my dentist, but they send me a bill.

Oral argument — United States v. Gregory Sperow

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 2, 2010

The first count, the CCE, had 98 predicate acts and 78 pages of overt acts, probably 700 overt acts. The third count, the money laundering count, had four. Why does that say it can't be tried? … time periods that cover the time period covered by counsel.

Oral argument — GARDNER v. MEGA LIFE, HEALTH

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 5, 2007

It's up in the air. It's a jump ball. Your Honor, in our view, it is not a jump ball. … I wanted to just point out in response to Your Honor's questions that the comment concerning the last overt act in the order appears on the bottom of page 7, as the court mentioned.

Oral argument — RIVERSIDE SHERIFF'S v. COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 16, 2005

But if I charge the cop with stealing from the evidence locker, and it gets washed out in an early stage, he's somehow entitled to a clean record. … Just a few brief comments.

Oral argument — Bradford v. Ayers

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 13, 2004

I think the rest of the tape gave context to that and showed – What's the point of having him – showing him being shackled and taken down the hall for a long period of time and all that? … Made a comment. You mean. Yes. I mean. So could have cut the other way. That he did it and you could look at the tape and. And argued that he didn't. Not only argue that you didn't. He did.

Oral argument — United States v. Peter Burno

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 7, 2022

It's on plein air review. We don't think that there was any plein air. … And kind of a final point, logically, any- Well, first, in a conspiracy, you don't have to commit the acts or the objects. So it's just an agreement to commit those acts.

Oral argument — & 04-74004 Martinez v. Gonzales

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 9, 2006

That's out of the period that's specified by the regulations. Was BIA required to — not to send your people out of the country until they had decided R.A.? … So the government's hands aren't clean as far as I'm concerned.

Oral argument — Westcott v. US Dept of Interior

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 28, 2010

And in doing so, it sought substantial public comment and input. … And plainly something happened because the numbers weren't pulled out of thin air.

Oral argument — Arizumi v. Vail Resorts

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 7, 2003

They came from Hawaii and they go to, say, Michigan and they go into a pool that's not properly cleaned, or they trip and fall down the stairs at the hotel. … I believe that it's still it's our point is they acted as a travel agent.

Oral argument — KENT v. PROVIDENT LIFE

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 5, 2005

Bratbauer's comments go beyond the current knowledge base of the risk factors involved. … It should not count as other act or other bad act evidence against Dr. Hashway or — against Provident Life.

Oral argument — United States v. Susan Tomsha-Miguel

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 14, 2014

So this Court is looking at it from a plein air perspective. The most likely reason he didn't object in real time is because the comments, when read in context, are completely appropriate and proper. … under a plein air standard.

Oral argument — United States v. Emmett Miguel

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 11, 2024

Yes, but I think the polygraph comment was so powerful, it probably influenced the hung jury in the first trial. It should have been allowed in the second trial. … And the I think she had to do more than simply jump to that based on a recommendation of the probation department because of the act itself, the alleged act itself.

Oral argument — Narviez Alexander v. State of Nevada

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 9, 2015

Fourth, none of the tests, neither the oxygen saturation nor the persistent oxygen tests that were provided over a long period of time, evidenced any type of a problem. … During his comments, now keep in mind, he had been at Lovelock for over two months when this conversation transpired.

Oral argument — Alliance for the Wild Rockies v. Leanne Marten

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 10, 2019

Disturbance effects would be short-term and insignificant, period. That's the whole discussion. That's true. … This use will be spread over a significant period. It will not be 48 hours back-to-back.