Documents

Oral argument — Figiel v. Chicago Plan Commission

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 15, 2011

And if you look at Representative Mathis' comments, he specifically says that. … , rather than as an administrative act for purposes of review.

Oral argument — Ryan v. Fox Television Stations

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 25, 2012

Right, but here we have a government watchdog organization commenting on an elected official. All elected officials in this system, right? There's no question in it. … They continued to put teaser video on the TV showing him ducking out, here's another judge, and making comments, dirty little secret of the Cook County Justice. Mr.

Oral argument — Bittendorf v. DeKalb County Collector

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 6, 2017

The Property Tax Code and its predecessor, the Illinois Revenue Act, have been in existence since before the Civil War. … What's the time period, the relevant time period? Pays when? Gets the refund from the taxing body when? The time period works like this. Upon demand, the collector shall pay.

Oral argument — People v. Yarber

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 18, 2021

And so her closing argument went over the line of simply commenting on the evidence to attack one witness while vouching for the other. And again, we have no objection to this. … But then we learn on cross-examination that there's a two-month period when she's not in the Yarbrough home, so there's no sexual conduct.

Oral argument — Kuykendall v. Schneidewind

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 9, 2016

And moreover, regarding that, that aspect, it's plaintiff's burden to the appellate, as the appellant here, to provide this Court with a record sufficiently complete to permit review of the air complaint … I appreciate your comment. Now, here the trial court did not err in dismissing the matter, correct, with prejudice as to all three defendants under 619.

Oral argument — People v. Hopkins

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 25, 2012

They supposedly heard this within a reasonable time period. None of them came forward and said anything. What is a reasonable time period under Chambers? Well, I don't really know. … But the two time periods that I have here are 4-11 or 4-12, and sometime in August, whenever that is.

Oral argument — Levart v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 23, 2017

acts. … Again, it is the plaintiff or appellant's position here that, in light of the prior criminal acts, as well as the surrounding circumstances that can be taken into consideration under Comment F of Section

Oral argument — In re Civil Union of Hamlin

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 4, 2015

Why not make it just very simple and very clean? It applies to civil unions that are in existence when Illinois recognizes civil unions. Why not just apply that? … No, it does not, because it's a separate section of the Civil Union Act. It's not at issue here. Don't we read all the provisions of the Act in period material to determine the intent of the Act?

Oral argument — Kenneth Wells and Sons v. Blackburn and Green

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 23, 2021

She responded, KWS itself really has not commented on anything to me, other than me just letting them know. … Graham, may I ask you to clarify your comment?

Oral argument — Yessenow v. Executive Risk Indemnity, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 25, 2011

treatment of the proceeds of the policies, which the plaintiffs here seek with respect to the defense of the underlying Abrams 1 action, and the policy itself, which is the property, I put highlighted or air … In I believe every case in that circumstance, the policy period was over before the bankruptcy was commenced.

Oral argument — People v. Connor

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 29, 2015

And I think it's like one of the comments made is like no comment I've ever seen before by a trial judge. … Show me that you didn't have it for the entire time period.

Oral argument — Ward v. J.J.B. Hilliard

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 18, 2018

Finally, the talk were aired in not giving due regard to Federal and State policy which favors arbitration as required by the U.S. Supreme Court in Mastro Buono I hope I've got that right v. … As noted by the committee comments to the rule, the purpose of a dispositive motion under 361 is to eliminate the burden of the parties by forcing them unnecessarily to brief and argue the merits of the

Oral argument — People v. Abron

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 3, 2021

And she thought that they acted, he acted that Mr. Abram acted weird, and that she thought it was odd, but she never testified to seeing any inappropriate behavior. In fact, yeah. … And that could account for the knowledge of, of sex, uh, that was found to be air.

Oral argument — People v. Fernandez

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 15, 2016

In addition to that, the .380 caliber firearm that was found in the bedroom under the mattress, there was .380 caliber ammunition found under the hood of the inoperable van, right next to the air arm, … All of these factors taken together show that he did not act with a reckless disregard for the truth.

Oral argument — Hadley v. Subscriber Doe

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 21, 2014

The specific comments underneath that story had absolutely nothing to do with each other. In other words, not only was the comment about Mr. … , Communications Decency Act, I think it's CDC.

Oral argument — People v. Null

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 11, 2012

they discussed that they did not dwell in either their opening or their closing arguments on the prior acts of domestic abuse. … Did you want to comment at all? I know the state didn't comment, but you didn't comment in your opening remarks about your argument concerning sentencing.

Oral argument — In re Marriage of: Bolte

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 22, 2012

And so I wanted to make that addition or comment in response to your comment. … Now, if we go in and review it, what factors under the Marital Settlement Act, or the Marital Dissolution Act, what factors favor terminating that maintenance at that point?

Oral argument — McCann v. Gondi

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 10, 2019

You have to have- You can't put the air into the esophagus. It has to go into the trachea to get down to the lungs. … He had no independent right to act in any way except as Dr. Gandhi permitted. So he was less than an agent. Where's the case law supporting all those comments? In terms of Dr.

Oral argument — People v. Puckett

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 25, 2012

And why doesn't this require a charge of domestic violence so that we're not pulling harassment of sorts out of the air? Or you're arguing he was talking loudly and Mr. … It was not, the trial court did not rely on that act as an act of harassment.

Oral argument — Shasteen v. Shelby Memorial Hospital

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 14, 2010

That provision was eliminated as a result of the Tort Reform Act and the Best v. Taylor machine. … It was in the hands of everyone within the 90-day period of time.