Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.32s
Amicus Curiae Brief — Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC Applicant v. The Wilderness Society, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jul 24, 2023
West Virginia (and Virginia and North Carolina) got tied up in this litigation cycle because the Pipeline implicates Sections 401 and 404 of the Clean Water Act. … United States, 505 U.S. 144, 167 (1992) (cleaned up).
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 10, 2021
Because the FAAAA’s preemption language is expressly borrowed from the Airline Deregulation Act (“ADA”) and also closely mirrors the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974’s (“ERISA”) preemption … See 9 Rowe, 552 U.S. at 370 (“the Congress that wrote the [FAAAA] copied the language of the air-carrier preemption provision of the Airline Deregulation Act of 1978 …. fully aware of this Court’s interpretation
Amicus Curiae Brief — Republican National Committee, Petitioner v. Mi Familia Vota, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 4, 2026
States are not required to wait until such crimes occur before acting. … Those who say that the 90-day span must be a “quiet period,” Va. Coal. for Immigrant Rights v. Beals, 803 F. Supp. 3d 454, 471-74 (E.D.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Digital Realty Trust, Inc. v. Somers, 138 S. Ct. 43 (2017) (No. 16-1276)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2017
Once the comment process is complicte, the agency then pub- lishes a final rule incorporating—or not—input that it received during the comment period. Id. … the notice-and-cumment period.”); Shell Oil Co. v.
Amicus Curiae Brief — U.S. Army Corp of Eng'rs v. Hawkes Co., 136 S. Ct. 615 (2015) (No. 15-290)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2015
Army Corps of Eng’rs, Clean Water Act Jurisdiction Following the U.S. Supreme Court’s Decision in Rapanos v. United States & Carabell v. United States (Dec. 2, 2008) . … Within 15 days of receiving a “complete” application, the Corps must issue a public notice and schedule a public comment period. 33 C.F.R. § 325.2(d).
Amicus Curiae Brief — CropLife America v. Baykeeper
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2010
AMCA members are vitally interested in whether the use of mosquito pesticides in lawful compliance with the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and _ Rodenticide Act (“FIFRA”) simultaneously constitutes … , as the Sixth Circuit held, the unlawful discharge into water of “pollutants” within the meaning of the Clean Water Act (“CWA”).
559 U.S. 936Amicus Curiae Brief — Dead Sea Bromine Co., Ltd. v. Patrickson
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2003
M/T Pavel Dybenko, 99\ ET 15-16 Coalition for Clean Air v. Southern Cal. Edison Co., 971 F.2d 219 (9th Cir. 1992)... 13 Colorado Interstate Gas Co. v. … See, e.g., Coalition for Clean Air v. Southern Cal.
537 U.S. 1185Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Nov 23, 2022
Impac Ltd., 432 U.S. 312 (1977)................................................................................................... 11 ii Utility Air Regul. Grp. v. … Id. at 2609 (quoting Utility Air Regul. Grp. v. EPA, 573 U.S. 302, 324 (2014)). Yet the EPA produced no “clear congressional authorization” for its action. Id. at 2614.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 25, 2023
Lief, Comment, A Prosecutorial Solution to the Criminalization of Homelessness, 169 U. PA. L. … Act Considerations.
Amicus Curiae Brief — South Florida Water Management District v. Miccosukee Tribe of Indians
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2003
(a)(1) ..........cccccececeeeeeees 26 Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1370 .0........cccccccccceeeeeeeeeeeeeeees i] Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1251 00.......ccccccccccceeeeeeeees 7, 8,9 Clean Water Act … See 40 C.F.R. § 122.21(c) (permit application shall be submitted 180 days before discharge), 124.10(b) (30 day public comment period), 124.15(a) and (b) (permit effective 30 days after agency decision
539 U.S. 957Amicus Curiae Brief — E.M.D. Sales, Inc., et al., Petitioners v. Faustino Sanchez Carrera, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Oct 10, 2023
INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT This case presents a clean opportunity to resolve an entrenched split on an important and recurring employment law issue under the Fair Labor Standards Act. … See Comment, Controlling Smart-Phone Abuse: The Fair Labor Standards Act’s Definition of “Work” in Non-Exempt Employee Claims for Overtime, 58 U. Kan. L.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 18, 2022
The text of the Clean Water Act supports that balance. The Act was intended to “recognize, preserve, and protect the primary responsibilities and rights of States.” 33 U.S.C. § 1251(b). … Wetlands are often at the Clean Water Act’s jurisdictional frontier.
Amicus Curiae Brief — James Courtney, et al., Petitioners v. David Danner, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Nov 2, 2020
City of Phila., 70 U.S. 713, 726 (1865) (cleaned up). … (cleaned up).
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Nov 23, 2022
Impac Ltd., 432 U.S. 312 (1977)................................................................................................... 11 ii Utility Air Regul. Grp. v. … Id. at 2609 (quoting Utility Air Regul. Grp. v. EPA, 573 U.S. 302, 324 (2014)). Yet the EPA produced no “clear congressional authorization” for its action. Id. at 2614.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Nov 13, 2023
(cleaned up)). … Air Regul. Grp. v.
Amicus Curiae Brief — CropLife America v. Baykeeper
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2010
AMCA members are vitally interested in whether the use of mosquito pesticides in lawful compliance with the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (“FIFRA”) simultaneously constitutes, … as the Sixth Circuit held, the unlawful discharge into water of “pollutants” within the meaning of the Clean Water Act (“CWA”).
559 U.S. 936Amicus Curiae Brief — Friends of Earth v. Laidlaw Environmental Services
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2000
Future deterrence of potential Clean Water Act viola- tions does not satisfy the redressability element of standing. … In addition, this Court stated, “[m]Joreover, both the Senate and House Reports explicitly connected §505 to the citizen suit provisions authorized by the Clean Air Act, which are wholly injunctive
528 U.S. 167Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 23, 2024
O’Handley involves a First Amendment challenge to a California censorship statute that required Twitter (now X) to remove the plaintiff’s comments regarding California’s elections as “misinformation.” … When Platforms act in concert with the government to remove specific user content from their sites, they are acting as state actors, not private entities.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Baker Botts, L.L.P. v. Asarco, L.L.C., 135 S. Ct. 697 (2014) (No. 14-103)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2014
Delaware Valley Citi- zens’ Council for Clean Air, 478 U.S. 546, 559 ” 764 F.2d 655, 662 (9th Cir. 1985). … * 496 U.S. 154, 165-66 (1990). 23 (1986) (fees for postjudgment proceedings to enforce consent decree properly compensable as a cost litigation under § 304(d) of the Clean Air Act); New York Gaslight
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1994
The state may have also had the right to clean up under Section 104 the federal statute, the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and liability Act ("CERCLA") and then to seek eee eee … This half-hour show aired in the New York/New Jersey area during the month of February, 1993.
511 U.S. 1046
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.