Documents

Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.

10,000+ results

0.12s

  • Oral argument — Bruce Levine v. Employers Ins. Co. of Wausau

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 23, 2018

    But at present, the law is and the forms are that U.N. endorsement is part of acquired forms which was aired publicly. … That form, as I understand it, Judge, is aired publicly for all insurance companies to make public comment on it. What I'm looking for is the authority.

    48 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Moore v. White

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 23, 2024

    He really would be doing that all the time because there was a pattern of not acting a matter that was normal, in air quotes. I mean, so I mean, so I mean, is Dr. … The charging period is simply January 13th.

    35 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Damon Claiborne v. Ryan D. McCarthy

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 11, 2019

    Moreover, during the course of the separation proceedings, out of thin air, the Secretary contrived a demonstrated proclivity as a basis to separate Sergeant Claiborne. … And Judge Ezra, just to your comment just a minute ago, I would, you know, it just seems so, so harsh and unfair.

    30 min of audio
  • Oral argument — ERICKSON v. USPS

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 6, 2010

    And that's simply a comment that he made about, well, you know, I prefer the military. … We find this and we find that, period.

    51 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Overwell Harvest, Limited v. Trading Technologies Internati

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 15, 2024

    And when you have a statute like the Clean Water Act, that wasn't around in England. So you have to figure out how would it have been treated or presented more than 200 years ago. … So in Tall versus the United States, we had a situation on the Clean Water Act. Somebody was polluting protected wetlands in Virginia. And the government sought $22 million in civil penalties.

    23 min of audio
  • Oral argument — James v, Willis

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 10, 2022

    But can we pursue, I think, the difference perhaps between the question that Judge Park is asking you and the comments of Judge Perez is discriminatory treatment on its own, right, is not an injury. … One of my questions was the alleged conspiracy to clean up and destroy the evidence in the synagogue.

    33 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Atlas Air, Inc. v. Internation

    Oral argument · Oral argument · May 3, 2019

    Robert Siegel for Atlas Air. Let me direct my first comments to the statute of limitations argument Mr. Gleeson just made. … Judge Forrest correctly relied on it to find that there was a process that was going on for a nine-month period.

    20 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Donny Love, Sr.

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 1, 2016

    It's plain air, but still, I mean... Is it plain air? That's I guess the question that I have. … That has to be cleaned up. Does that change the sentence in any way, that count 10? The one that has to go back. Right.

    35 min of audio
  • Oral argument — In re Marriage of Tuchardt

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 9, 2009

    In Judge Butler's order, however, it is evident in the comments of friends, family, and litigant interviews that Mr. … If he had responsibility too, he should have cleaned it up. He had just as much obligation as she did to clean it up.

    41 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Lamont Owens

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 13, 2020

    And so I want to, for my comments today, I'll be focused on the re-hate element that was created in that case. … That goes to air and plain air, though, I think.

    28 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Magellan Technology, Inc. v. United States Food and Drug Ad

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 6, 2023

    It's not actually, oh, at one point we thought that end product needed to clean the air, and now they're deciding end products need to be safe for children. … If it's a regulation that required an opportunity to require notice and comment, then one becomes almost prejudiced by not having that opportunity to comment.

    32 min of audio
  • Oral argument — R.L.R. Investments v. Central Freight Lines

    Oral argument · Oral argument · May 22, 2013

    The plaintiff said, please clean it up. They cleaned it up. They notified the plaintiff that they cleaned it up. A year and a half later, you know, they're getting sued for rent and that's it. … There are claims in here in regards to cleaning for cleaning pigeon droppings. I would say that's normal wear and tear or an act of God. That's not something that the defendant did.

    38 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Maria Garcia-Mata v. Jefferson B. Sessions, III

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 9, 2018

    So we don't have a clean enough record, I think, from the fact finder. … And the second comment, that the organization had been around a long time and didn't leave any loose ends.

    31 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Victor Mason

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 16, 2014

    I mean, every conversation consists of some periods of silence and some periods of conversation. You know, you do want to have some discernible rules. Right, this splits it fine. … Now, if an officer is acting with objectively reasonable suspicion and an officer is acting with what a court has found to be objective probable cause, doesn't that lessen the likelihood substantially

    52 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Venture Commodities Inc. v. City of Canton, Georgia

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 27, 2026

    But the city here acted in coordination to launch a campaign to suffocate basically this business and remove them through multiple measures by revoking this permit without entertaining the city ordinance … Yeah, don't take my comments to be any sort of predetermination on anything. Not at all, Your Honor. All right, thank you both very much. It's been very helpful. Thank you.

    33 min of audio
  • Oral argument — People v. Becker

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 16, 2010

    There's no clean evidence left to get. Defense proposes that the trial court did not consider this issue carefully. … Finally, it was aired in showing that, that finally aired in concluding the that she was going to offer a bare comment on credibility. As we said, she wasn't going to do that.

    50 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Gonzalez-Lopez v. State Industrial Prod. Corp.

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 28, 2020

    I think you need to distinguish between those acts which have no statute of limitations or limitation period on the one hand, and then what those acts are before the 300-day period that you are concerned … that otherwise would be time barred so long as a related act, one related act, fell within the limitations period.

    22 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Brian Gile v. Dolgen California, LLC

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 15, 2022

    And for strategic reasons, you chose to basically litigate in the district court for a period of nine months. … But this prolonged period of time, most of that time was eaten up with the plaintiffs just trying to clean up the allegations in the complaint.

    24 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc. v. Topcon Medical Systems, Inc.

    Oral argument · Oral argument · May 6, 2022

    One point from the case, I'll refer to the Reno Air case cited by plaintiffs. … We said, wow, we need to clean this up.

    34 min of audio
  • Oral argument — The Travelers Indemnity Company v. DeGroate Petroleum Service

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 28, 2013

    It's going to be very expensive to clean that up. … were clean because there's other contamination on the property.

    36 min of audio

Ask Donna what matters in the record.

She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.