Documents

Oral argument — United States v. Jeremiah

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 18, 2007

I think the statutory scheme contemplates that during a period of supervision, the Court has jurisdiction. … So your position is his remedy would be if they tested him eight times, no more than eight times a month, and he came back clean a couple of months in a row, he could come in and say, you know, this is

Oral argument — Larry Montz v. Pilgrim Films & Television, Inc

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 16, 2010

Copyright Act. … Well, no comment.

Oral argument — Moreno v. City of Sacramento

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 1, 2003

Did this employee who did the act have discretionary authority to decide on his own whether to act or not to act? If he did, he's immune. … There are a number of issues which were briefed and raised on the appeal which have not been addressed by your comments today.

Oral argument — SPRAWLDEF v. FEMA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 12, 2018

comment. … And the Park District adopted this plan way back in 2010 after a multiyear participatory process and environmental review under the California Environmental Equality Act.

Oral argument — Tino Pese v. D. Runnels

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 4, 2013

It's just not a clean analysis. But I have to take it for what it is. I agree. I agree. … I want to comment about the pattern of — of — of preemptory challenges here. You take your prospective jurors as you find them.

Oral argument — National Labor Relations Board v. Airgas USA, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 8, 2025

But there's no way to back engineer the data on the record in the air gas case to show what criteria Scott McFarland used in those several years before 2018. … That's a straightforward act of retaliation that violated the National Labor Relations Act.

Oral argument — Kimberly Asper v. Costco Wholesale

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 22, 2015

The act, the act does not provide for it, nor did she seek it. … So he's not plucking some public policy from thin air and trying to impose it on the circumstances. He's grounding his public policy discussion in the remedies under the statute.

Oral argument — Salem v. Terhune

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 14, 2003

So wake up at 4 a.m. and drive all the way to the Air Force Base. No problem, right? Well, the fact is, and he did do that. … Hicks refused to release plaintiff as she was out that act, but referred to it as an act of Congress.

Oral argument — Continental Casualty Company v. Nancy Culver

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 13, 2025

has a duty to cover Gore under the policy as an insured Gore is insured it meets the definition of who is insured under the policy in various different ways what where that where this district court aired … under Nevada law it's called a member of an LLC was squarely in front of judge Thomasson in the Beecher action but I don't so I give you that there is that that that I almost want to call it a straight comment

Oral argument — Calmat v. US Dept. of Labor

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 9, 2004

And there are a series of similar comments there. … And it certainly doesn't defend the Act. It's not repugnant to the Act.

Oral argument — United States v. Paul Williams

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 8, 2014

So your argument is, is the part of the acts, that there were no acts that occurred within the statute of limitations period? Is that your point? Well, I'll say this. I don't know. … If it's forfeiture and air, we review it. If it's waived and air, we don't review it. Because it's an affirmative defense, I believe it may be forfeited. And I'm looking ---- It may be waived.

Oral argument — United States v. Adan Pineda-Doval

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 14, 2012

And the only case that the defense cites to suggest that this comment must undermine our belief that the district judge knew what he was doing is Stewart, which is a pre-sentencing reform act case, pre … The judge made comments about parole, things that clearly do not apply.

Oral argument — Stone Creek, Inc. v. Omnia Italian Design, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 6, 2017

And the district court aired in concluding it didn't. … And this was in the comments about the issue with Brookfield and Lindy Penn.

Oral argument — Aero Turbine, Inc. v. Aeroturbine, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 12, 2003

The fact that we had air in there, just to signify it was aircraft-related. It's true that Mr. … There certainly might be statute of limitations issues with respect to trying to recover under the Lanham Act past a certain period of time.

Oral argument — Hobson v. Orthodontic Ctrs of America Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 7, 2006

There are four items this morning that I'd like to emphasize because I believe they're worthy of further comment. … Bradford characterizes these issues as clean-up issues. OCA's recovery is clean-up issues.

Oral argument — Leon Belaustegui v. ILWU

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 10, 2024

The way that he acted in response to what he understood is likely an exception to hearsay and in itself would likely be admissible. … The first time it was acted upon was in 2016, and then in 2018 again he sought to apply for them.

Oral argument — United States v. Camacho

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 16, 2005

acting as a sovereign. … Now, that's just for the particular evaluation period.

Oral argument — United States v. Jorge Gomez-Gomez

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 4, 2019

That's a comment. It's a representation. What the judge didn't do is determine what the facts were. … So the issue about San Francisco was fully aired at the hearing. The defense counsel was fully on notice about that.

Oral argument — Pyramid Lake Paiute v. Board of Directors

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 8, 2009

The Settlement Act was in 1990. Yes. The complaint was filed. There were apparently settlement discussions or something about the Settlement Act. Right. … There's got to be a logical or some kind of analogous basis to do so. 1961 is as good as any as opposed to pulling something out of thin air.

Oral argument — Rose Johansen v. American General Life Ins. Co.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 7, 2014

Do you want to continue with your comments and look that up during? Well, yes. I want to. I really. … And the final comment If you have an answer to Judge Hawkins I do.