Documents

Oral argument — Thomas Krakauer v. Dish Network

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 9, 2019

They have to be done, there have to be multiple calls within a 12-month period. … And if you can just clean it up in the back end, a case that cannot be cleaned up, then no one will ever certify proper classes.

Oral argument — UMG Recordings, Inc. v. Shelter Capital Partners LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 6, 2011

With respect to Trident, as the court knows, it was a clean air act case. … Because the Trident case, which this Court had before, was a clear Clean Air Act case, and the Champion case was a contract case that was applying a law from the state of Idaho.

Oral argument — Center for Biologica v. Marina Point

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 14, 2008

So I'm trying to find out first whether there was Clean Water Act jurisdiction. … And you have 60 days to start behaving yourself under the Clean Water Act or else we can sue you.

Oral argument — Nationstar Mortgage, LLC v. Sanders

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 6, 2018

So when it's modified in May, and there was testimony that that wipes the slate clean. … But what you're saying is when that letter gets sent out in August, that slate that was wiped clean in May is no longer wiped clean.

Oral argument — Ecology Center, Inc. v. Kimbell

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 19, 2008

The Solicitor General's brief noted that there is an exception to that when the statute implementing a regulation specifically provides for pre-enforcement review, such as the Clean Air Act, and that was … Now, it's true that in many contexts an agency doesn't need to accede to the comments, the public comments. It doesn't have to choose a specific commenter's path.

Oral argument — United States v. Peter (Campbell)

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 11, 2021

My client wasn't even present when marijuana was in the air, let alone possessed for... … They argued that there was a three-minute time period. They're running away from the shooting at six minutes after the hour.

Oral argument — Vorchheimer v. The Philadelphia Owners Association

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 23, 2018

She can't stand for even short periods of time, so she requires the use of a walker. … It hasn't gone through notice and comment. It doesn't get Chevron deference. It gets Skidmore deference. Correct. I don't see anything in there that parses the statute.

Oral argument — Madison v. EPA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 3, 2004

Both of these acts, the Clean Water Act and the National Environment Laws. No, it's significant. … You had asked what the intent of the Clean Water Act was.

Oral argument — Fulcher v. Secretary of Veterans Affairs

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 3, 2018

Can you comment on that? Sure. … I guess there's an acting secretary now.

Oral argument — Craker v. DEA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 5, 2022

Once you got it during the comment period, once you had it was it not part of the record? Was it not available to the public to comment? It was not. It was published on DOJ's website. … But the folks who had already begun using the comment period to develop their comments… I guess I'm just… Was it part of the rulemaking record or not? No, Your Honor. It was not.

Oral argument — United States v. Rahimi

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 30, 2022

Well, your brief didn't address their comment about surety laws, right? I think we did address that, Your Honor, but I'm happy to clear that up right now. … He shot it into the air. Your Honor, at that time, he did discharge a gun.

Oral argument — John Carruth v. Justice D. Smyth, III

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 9, 2019

found his 30 plus year career come to an abrupt halt on the credit union administration, the ACUA, conserved the credit union, and shortly thereafter, the administrator of the ACUA, Sarah Moore, as the acting … But then the court drew a bright line of demarcation between the Morgan-led ACA administration and the subsequent Moore—Saramore-led ACA administration and said, no, that administration was clean.

Oral argument — Kevin Lindke v. James Freed

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 27, 2022

And to me, that would not be a state act. It would not be a state action when you did that. … It's the non-ability to post comments. The banning is the inability to post comments. That matters. It's not that he can't see the speech. That's correct. That's correct.

Oral argument — United States v. Luis Fernandez

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 13, 2018

There has been raised no issue as to the government's comments during closing arguments, both in the trial, the post-trial motion for a new trial, nor in the appellate briefs. … It was clean, well-maintained.

Oral argument — State of Montana v. BNSF Railway Company

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 5, 2009

Period. I can't state it any more elegantly. That's what it is. … As chief, but I think it's been a limited period of time. Judge Lovell maintained it. Oh, yeah.

Oral argument — Neona Modoc v. Andrew Saul

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 16, 2021

fairly attributed because of the different time periods involved. … So I'd like to hear your comments on that. Sure, Your Honor. There's no question that there is conflicting evidence in this case, as you point out, Judge Ferguson.

Oral argument — Hugh Weiss v. Kuck Trucking, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 9, 2006

Water Act. … Water Act.

Oral argument — In Interest of T.G.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 5, 2016

The respondent had 10 years of being outside and clean and during the life of these children up until he was arrested. You said outside and clean. Meaning he wasn't arrested for any crimes. … But what I'm saying is that in the court record, the only comment made about the state's comment about him not having any convictions during 10 years prior was their only comment was, well, we find that

Oral argument — Delaware Riverkeeper Network v

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 9, 2018

No, we're seeking compliance with the Clean Water Act, public participation portions of the Clean Water Act, which only requires an opportunity for a hearing, not necessarily having a hearing. … In fact, that court noted that public notice and comment that's required under the Clean Water Act, that requirement had been satisfied when that general permit was issued by the department.

Oral argument — Whisnant v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 18, 2005

Discretionary immunity exception to the Federal Tort Claims Act is the basis for his ruling. … Mold was not at the time, and I don't believe it is now, a regulated indoor air contaminant. It was not.