Documents

Oral argument — Baber Habib v. Loretta E. Lynch

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 11, 2015

But it seems to me, and I hadn't thought about this in quite this way before, but it seems to me you're asking us to credit conduct, kind of inequitable terms, for the fact that you remember the old clean … And in terms of this matter, then, the question presented is really about whether or not the Board acted within its discretion.

Oral argument — Evangeline Red v. Kraft Foods Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 15, 2017

Safety Clean Systems? Yes. In that case, which I was a part of, we affirmed the district court's 50% negative multiplier to account for a limited success. … So whether you call it under a catalyst theory or he awarded them under the Consumer Legal Remedies Act or you awarded it under the private attorney general statute, he noted that they were a minor victor

Oral argument — Paolini v. Albertsons, Inc

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 22, 2005

You're arguing that they really shouldn't have been acting here. Your Honor, I don't believe the Court needs to get to whether or not they should have been acting. … We gave him the period to exercise anything that had been vested, but not the ones that weren't vested. What was the normal vesting period? What was the normal vesting period?

Oral argument — United States v. Fernandez

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 5, 2008

And, of course, it's in that time period, when they don't do that, that all the interceptions that relate to my client are made. So as to my client, it's an absolutely critical period of time. … And that, Your Honor, is, for all practical purposes, since I'm hitting some up at this point, so much for my brief comment. Counsel, you have about a minute and 40 seconds. Do you want to reserve?

Oral argument — United States v. Lance Stoddard

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 3, 2009

He didn't admit that I knew within this period of time that the guns were in there. … There were some matcher striker plates and then went on to say that the hazmat people had to come in to clean the mess up.

Oral argument — Felix Prescott v. American Automobile Ass'n

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 8, 2017

It's not an accurate credit reporting act. It is a fair credit reporting act. Accuracy is one of the four values that this act is trying to protect. … to a clean slate, what if that had happened?

Oral argument — ACLU of Nevada v. Fremont Street Ltd.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 1, 2006

From your comments, it sounds like that's the basis for why we think the appeal lies properly. … Clean it up. Go back on remit. You know, sort this out. We tried to.

Oral argument — United States v. Sullivan

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 9, 2008

We need to look at the financials for the gap period. And Mr. Mousseau then faxes Mr. … Well, Your Honor, I believe, and I'll just finish on this comment, that, again, the government has to act appropriately in presenting its evidence, and they have to meet the elements of the crimes.

Oral argument — Christopher Hamilton v. Elite of Los Angeles, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 6, 2020

Well, Your Honor, I would disagree with your comment as to whether an individual can be liquidated. … It says an act against property of the estate under Subsection A, and then it says any other act under Subsection A. So you're saying this is an act against the property?

Oral argument — Schuman v. Microchip Technology Incorporated

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 12, 2025

Following up on my colleague's comment, ERISA is a special law. It's shot through with trust concepts. I wrote a case a number of years ago called TIF. … That's the right way to do it because if you're going to come to equity, you have to come with clean hands.

Oral argument — City of Buffalo v. Hyundai Motor America, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 8, 2025

The key point in Beretta, though, is that it's not the act of negligence that determines whether you look to this third-party rule. … There in the comments, it says that the proper question is not whether an actor's failure to exercise reasonable care entails the commission or omission of a specific act.

Oral argument — Ponkey v. LLR, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 10, 2025

That means that when there's a conspiracy, it's the last over act and furtherance of that conspiracy. What about the securities and SAMP Act claims? Yeah, so that's the SAMP Act. … There were air ducts in the cross space that were lined with asbestos, an unsealed air return, the property was built on expansive soil, and more.

Oral argument — Katie Kane v. Chobani, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 16, 2016

They're also looking, in certain cleanings, for substitutions and substitutions and expanding their positions as part of the game. That's one thing. … In this case, the court, I mean the FDA exchanged their comments or requested comments. There were speaking points only on the today to today's hearing. Okay. There are people watching us.

Oral argument — Bodett v. Coxcom,Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 9, 2004

And under the Employment Protection Act in Arizona, that would not be contractually binding on either of the parties. … We're going to stand in recess for five minutes, and then we'll take up the last case, Stonelight Tile, against the Air Quality Management District. Thank you.

Oral argument — United States v. Sterling Centrecorp Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 25, 2019

It's not related to this particular decision to hook some homes up to a pipeline to provide clean public water. … So the mine was allowed to continue operating for some period of time after the order was issued, not until it's specifically applied to it is it canceled.

Oral argument — Milbourn v. Sue Del Papa

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 6, 2006

The prosecutor didn't actually comment on his failure to give a statement or anything like that? The prosecutor didn't make a comment on that in closing argument. … No comment in the closing argument in Doyle? I'm not sure if there was in Doyle. In this case, there was no comment in Doyle. I thought there was in Doyle.

Oral argument — Michael Assenberg v. Whitman County

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 29, 2018

Because my understanding is that he suffers from them periodically. I'm going to do this this way because the clock is ticking. Right. … In California, there's a Brown Act. And the Brown Act says there's going to be an opportunity for people to address that type of a body.

Oral argument — Reed v. Penasquitos Casablan

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 4, 2009

But if you have a contractor who comes out every week to clean the pool, isn't he going to be subject to the Fair Housing Act if he's discriminating by throwing all the kids out of the pool when he gets … there to clean it?

Oral argument — Katie Mayes v. Winco Holdings, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 8, 2016

Steen was acting harshly towards her. Ms. Ulrich? Yes. We've really thoroughly prepared, so we know the facts. Right. Can I direct you to the area that I'd like to hear your comment on? Please, yes. … Steen told him that the use of cakes in the store had never been allowed, period, which, as counsel acknowledged, is not true.

Oral argument — Cosmo Colaruotolo v. SSA Containers, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 12, 2018

Colaruotolo has established that he suffered injuries to his lumbar spine and cervical spine under the Longshore Act and is entitled to benefits. … Stauber's comments were that it was speculative as it relates to the number of days he could get that work, thus it was random.