Documents

Oral argument — People v. Hampton

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 11, 2024

So, it is true that the Armed Provisional Criminal Statute is silent on mental state, but the Possession as a Voluntary Act Statute states that possession is a voluntary act if the offender knowingly procured … If a person is acting with intent, they are acting with knowledge.

Oral argument — Mahoney v. The Evergreen Park Police Pension Board

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 19, 2013

Well, let's talk about the covered act. … So I would ask you to comment on that. I don't think it's a material discrepancy. I think it's tangential at best.

Oral argument — People v. Russell

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 7, 2011

, who is acting as an arm of the state. … of July 7 of 2007 to August 23 of 2007, a period of 48 days.

Oral argument — Estate of Zivin

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 29, 2015

I think it's a sub-comment or additional comment F in the restatement that's cited by count 107 that says, although for judicial economy, you could join the trustee. … There's nothing in the record by the 9-4-14 deadline or 13 deadline when the claim period expired.

Oral argument — People v. Floyd

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 15, 2014

This is a 911 report of a domestic violence incident with several statements that suggested that she was either paid or forced to perform sex acts. … If you shoot a gun at a target at some distance, the bullet will hit the target twice accurately because the bullet goes up in the air and comes back down.

Oral argument — People v. Wilson

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 20, 2015

The first argument is whether the prosecutor's closing argument commenting on the credibility of the defendant was proper, and the State is maintaining it was based on evidence and reasonable inferences … It's regardless of whether the offense occurred as a result of the same act or of several related or unrelated acts. So it doesn't have to happen at the same time according to the statute.

Oral argument — Higgins v. Harrison

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 18, 2013

Counsel, what about Judge Flannel's comments regarding the contract under which your client acted as the manager, that had this penalty, substantial penalty, that would have to be paid to him if the contract … The court did act on it, but it was kind of stop and go during that time period. During 2012 were the defendants appearing pro se? For certain periods of time, yes, they were. Mr.

Oral argument — In re Marriage of Cozadd

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 4, 2017

When Judge Gomrich made her comments from the bench, it was in the form of a ruling. Yes. … The judge even commented that that was certainly something that she considered.

Oral argument — Prairie Farms Dairy v. Illinois Workers' Compensation Comm'n

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 24, 2026

Sampson said, well, it can take up to, what, 45 minutes or an hour, it was a substantial period of time. … In that case, the employee violated the Illinois statute, which was the Mining Act, which ultimately led to his death.

Oral argument — Johnson v. Bishof

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 3, 2015

Did you want to comment on the negligence? Well, I just was going to follow up on that. Ms. Scott said that Dr. … And in this case, you know, he had already ruled that out because an X-ray and CT showed that the spine was clean. Okay, thank you. Thank you.

Oral argument — In the Matter of the Application of the county Collector and Petition of Huff

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 18, 2009

this notice as being absolutely correct it doesn't exist well it doesn't exist when you say that it was void it's not like we were wrong now if we put the number down and we made something out of the air … investigated gave it to his attorney got a title positive and decided not to redeem had he not received the documents had there been some other facts there that would be fine but he made, after doing all those acts

Oral argument — Estate of Spitler

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 11, 2023

For those reasons, we believe that the trial court acted beyond the scope of his authority with regard to this complaint for declaratory judgment. … And, you know, the period of time that we were working with there basically was a minimum of six months for the administration of the probate estate.

Oral argument — In re The Commitment of Shanks

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 10, 2016

That would be our argument, Your Honor, because otherwise you are taking a situation where acts when someone's less than 16, that the criteria says, we don't know if this was an adult comment, these may … These were acts when he was a minor. He was under 16 years of age. They can't give you the six-month period. The 2004 conviction doesn't meet the criteria. But then consider the 2010 conviction.

Oral argument — Janousek v. Slotky

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 6, 2012

First, SPSS did not evaluate the LLC Act. It related to a corporation and, moreover, the proper purpose requirement in the LLC Act was added in 1998. … And his 40% and the other stuff is evanescent, up in the air. We get it. Said better than I could.

Oral argument — Pavnica v. Veguilla

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 21, 2010

traveling He gave him Levaquin at that time which is a broad spectrum antibiotic but it's an antibiotic that only covers for anaerobic bacteria not anaerobic bacteria which is bacteria that doesn't need air … They acted as physicians. But this was after the fact.

Oral argument — Contreras v. Board of Ed. City of Chicago

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 24, 2023

Counselor, could you pull the mic a little closer because we have the air conditioning back here? I'd be glad to. But it also doesn't amplify you, so you have to keep your voice down. … This is actually an appropriate comment from a teacher. This is not inappropriate.

Oral argument — Peabody Coal Co. v. The Workers' Compensation Commission

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 26, 2010

The commission tied everything into a comment finding Dr. Cohen to be more credible than all the other medical evidence. And their comment was or finding was Dr. … A man gets a permanent total and within the statutory time period, and then he files under the Occupational Disease Act, you get it dismissed because he's gotten a permanent total for a back injury, and

Oral argument — People v. Coan

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 4, 2019

It's because Section 9e of the Sexually Dangerous Person Act says so. Now, in the Sexually Dangerous Person Recovery Act, as we have here, neither side may elect to have the case heard by a jury. Mr. … But now this was an issue that was fully aired in front of the jury. Dr. Clouch addressed it in his testimony.

Oral argument — U.S. Bank National Association v. Manzo

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 3, 2011

Act for rescission. … If we act or we don't act, and you went on that issue, then the bank's in jeopardy because it didn't act within the 20 days. Well, clearly, Your Honor. How do you get between those two lines?

Oral argument — People v. Haley

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 4, 2011

He's prejudiced because the jury had to, even to convict him of involuntary manslaughter, they had to prove that there was a reckless act performed, but they also had to prove that the act was likely to … Shoved me really hard, and I flew seven or eight feet out into the air and landed in the lake in my clothes. That testimony wouldn't have changed, would it? It wouldn't have.