Documents

Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.

5,768 results

0.18s

  • Oral argument — Reyna v. City of Portland

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 5, 2007

    That would be really nice and clean. All right. … And it was in that time period in November when Officer Stradley made the phone call to her.

    41 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Bates v. UPS

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 15, 2005

    The district court ruled that UPS cannot do so and that its attempt to do so and its current policy in which it does so violates the Americans with Disabilities Act. … Does it mean, for example, that they – is it sufficient that they have a driver's license, that they're employed by UPS, basically, period, and everything else goes into defense?

    50 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Eid v. Alaska Airlines, Inc

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 18, 2008

    An act is something that can jeopardize the good order or discipline of the aircraft. Going back to Article 8. … The courts have read into it the reasonableness standard because 44-902B says permissive refusal subject to regulations of the undersecretary, an air carrier, interstate air carrier, or foreign air carrier

    55 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Kaleb Basey

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 5, 2019

    But the point is, from Teckle, is that merely commenting on the merits is not the same as a ruling on the merits. … Well, it's a long period. Though I would say that it's only 20... The first one, the length of the delay, that's just up to... in the air. So we're really looking at second consideration, right?

    32 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Jeffrey Green v. City of Phoenix

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 18, 2020

    The time period in which to file for, uh, judgment is a matter of law, a motion for a new trial. … There's a strong inference, but I don't know that it's absolutely outside if it's a long period. But here, what I'm talking about is a very short period. It's a month.

    38 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Jones v. Blanas

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 1, 2004

    jail for the entire period. … Well, he complained about the conditions in which he was kept, that he didn't get enough clean clothes, that the temperature was very cold.

    29 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Allstate Insurance Co. v. Alexander Yin

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 12, 2015

    As I was indicating, we are not writing on a clean slate here. … If Richard had wanted to bring a case within the statutory period, arguing that his mother's Allstate agent acted negligently and not adding him to the policy, that would have been a different case, and

    27 min of audio
  • Oral argument — In re: McClenny

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 22, 2018

    During that entire period of time, he made all the payments. So under California dissolution law, there's going to be offsetting things. … And having liquidated assets sufficient to resolve the bankruptcy issues, is she obligated to or even have jurisdiction to take other acts?

    31 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Ceja-Lopez

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 13, 2004

    I believe, because there were no objections to it, it has to be a plain air standard. … He committed a substantial step, and that's the Leo Smaldonado decision of this Court, that the act of crossing the borders is a substantial step toward the completion of the offense.

    14 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Hani Nuure v. Robert Wilkinson

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 10, 2021

    If the act doesn't have a tendency to promote, sustain, and maintain the organization, then it doesn't fall under material support. … But the standard, we believe, is set out in ACM, which we believe is entitled to deference under Chevron Step 2, which is actually whether the act, if the act has a logical and reasonably foreseeable tendency

    35 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Prov Govt Marinduque v. Placer Dome, Inc.

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 10, 2009

    First of all, because, as I say, the case is not about the government's acts. It's about the acts of the mining company. Secondly, these are the acts of President Marcos. … Do you wish to comment on that? Well, in Patterson, among other things, you did have state law claims alleged under Hawaii law. It's actually the same. I understand that.

    36 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Nan Myint v. Eric H. Holder Jr.

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 8, 2013

    The judge did not comment on that. Instead, she focused on the fake passport. Ms. … She was basically cleaning toilets and making beds. And there's nothing but pure speculation on the part of the judge that she would have to go through any type of check.

    29 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Omnipoint Communications Inc. v. City of Huntington Beach

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 6, 2012

    So you're acting as a sub-customer. You know, owning property for a 20-year period or a 15-year period or even a one-year period, it's still one element of ownership as part of the bundle of sticks. … And they've adopted some standards that would that if we don't act, I believe, in about a six-month period, then they may have the right to go through.

    35 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Goodrich Corporation v. USDOD

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 3, 2009

    Furthermore, the administrative record is open to comment by the parties, by parties not just including Goodrich, by other parties as well. … EPA would then say, well, you haven't cleaned up the site yet.

    27 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Yu Park

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 19, 2021

    It really is not intended to replace a period of incarceration in the same way that the mandatory state supervision term at Cervantes did. And I mean, I think the courts now... … As Judge Hurdle has noted, this panel is not writing on a clean slate with respect to this issue.

    24 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Jody Carr v. Stelzer

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 9, 2018

    Stelzer first threatened him for contacting the ACLU, and then carried out their threat by acting with warden blades to twice house a next-win inmate who had previously broken his spine in a vicious attack … Again, I know that's disputed in the affidavits, but this needs to be cleaned up here. What it needs to be cleaned up is a jury trial. What did these guys say?

    29 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Turtle Island Restoration v. Dept of Commerce

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 17, 2005

    There's a pre-regulatory process of notice and comment, et cetera, correct? Yes. So backing up from the 30 days, there's always going to be some period. … And if you look at all of those cases with respect to the Federal Aviation Administration, you will see that this court in particular does a lot of air court cases.

    40 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Jane Doe v. Compania Panamena de Aviacion

    Oral argument · Oral argument · May 17, 2022

    Period. Period. Um, to kind of get back into that issue, there are two courts, um, cited in the brief one from the northern district of California and one out of, uh, Illinois. … And here, if an American procedural device like will 15 C can be used to extend that limitations period, um, it would have the limitations period.

    32 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Gutierrez-Cisneros

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 9, 2006

    But also the government has not raised in its brief that this is plein air. So they've waived I think any plein air standard on that. I see I only have six seconds left. I will rise. … You can use specific specific acts of misconduct when they're relevant to show motive. Are we talking about 608B or are we talking about 404B? Pardon me, 404B. Yes, sir. I was talking about 608B.

    20 min of audio
  • Oral argument — MUSTANG v. CHEVRON

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 18, 2005

    Hutchins in the Eleventh Circuit has commented on it. Baraka out of the First Circuit has commented on it. Baraka out of the Seventh Circuit has alluded to it indirectly. … The legislative history of the cases all talk about that being the most egregious violation of the Act.

    33 min of audio

Ask Donna what matters in the record.

She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.