Documents

Oral argument — Hani Nuure v. Robert Wilkinson

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 10, 2021

If the act doesn't have a tendency to promote, sustain, and maintain the organization, then it doesn't fall under material support. … But the standard, we believe, is set out in ACM, which we believe is entitled to deference under Chevron Step 2, which is actually whether the act, if the act has a logical and reasonably foreseeable tendency

Oral argument — Schuman v. Microchip Technology Incorporated

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 12, 2025

Following up on my colleague's comment, ERISA is a special law. It's shot through with trust concepts. I wrote a case a number of years ago called TIF. … That's the right way to do it because if you're going to come to equity, you have to come with clean hands.

Oral argument — United States v. Kaleb Basey

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 5, 2019

But the point is, from Teckle, is that merely commenting on the merits is not the same as a ruling on the merits. … Well, it's a long period. Though I would say that it's only 20... The first one, the length of the delay, that's just up to... in the air. So we're really looking at second consideration, right?

Oral argument — Reyna v. City of Portland

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 5, 2007

That would be really nice and clean. All right. … And it was in that time period in November when Officer Stradley made the phone call to her.

Oral argument — United States v. Brock Purviance

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 27, 2010

Well, I'm basing my comments on the record. I have the same problem. I'm basing my comments on the record. … I just want to make a couple of comments in response.

Oral argument — Jones v. Blanas

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 1, 2004

jail for the entire period. … Well, he complained about the conditions in which he was kept, that he didn't get enough clean clothes, that the temperature was very cold.

Oral argument — Hobson v. Orthodontic Ctrs of America Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 7, 2006

There are four items this morning that I'd like to emphasize because I believe they're worthy of further comment. … Bradford characterizes these issues as clean-up issues. OCA's recovery is clean-up issues.

Oral argument — In re: McClenny

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 22, 2018

During that entire period of time, he made all the payments. So under California dissolution law, there's going to be offsetting things. … And having liquidated assets sufficient to resolve the bankruptcy issues, is she obligated to or even have jurisdiction to take other acts?

Oral argument — Nan Myint v. Eric H. Holder Jr.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 8, 2013

The judge did not comment on that. Instead, she focused on the fake passport. Ms. … She was basically cleaning toilets and making beds. And there's nothing but pure speculation on the part of the judge that she would have to go through any type of check.

Oral argument — Omnipoint Communications Inc. v. City of Huntington Beach

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 6, 2012

So you're acting as a sub-customer. You know, owning property for a 20-year period or a 15-year period or even a one-year period, it's still one element of ownership as part of the bundle of sticks. … And they've adopted some standards that would that if we don't act, I believe, in about a six-month period, then they may have the right to go through.

Oral argument — Jeffrey Green v. City of Phoenix

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 18, 2020

The time period in which to file for, uh, judgment is a matter of law, a motion for a new trial. … There's a strong inference, but I don't know that it's absolutely outside if it's a long period. But here, what I'm talking about is a very short period. It's a month.

Oral argument — Goodrich Corporation v. USDOD

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 3, 2009

Furthermore, the administrative record is open to comment by the parties, by parties not just including Goodrich, by other parties as well. … EPA would then say, well, you haven't cleaned up the site yet.

Oral argument — United States v. Yu Park

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 19, 2021

It really is not intended to replace a period of incarceration in the same way that the mandatory state supervision term at Cervantes did. And I mean, I think the courts now... … As Judge Hurdle has noted, this panel is not writing on a clean slate with respect to this issue.

Oral argument — Jody Carr v. Stelzer

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 9, 2018

Stelzer first threatened him for contacting the ACLU, and then carried out their threat by acting with warden blades to twice house a next-win inmate who had previously broken his spine in a vicious attack … Again, I know that's disputed in the affidavits, but this needs to be cleaned up here. What it needs to be cleaned up is a jury trial. What did these guys say?

Oral argument — Cosmo Colaruotolo v. SSA Containers, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 12, 2018

Colaruotolo has established that he suffered injuries to his lumbar spine and cervical spine under the Longshore Act and is entitled to benefits. … Stauber's comments were that it was speculative as it relates to the number of days he could get that work, thus it was random.

Oral argument — Turtle Island Restoration v. Dept of Commerce

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 17, 2005

There's a pre-regulatory process of notice and comment, et cetera, correct? Yes. So backing up from the 30 days, there's always going to be some period. … And if you look at all of those cases with respect to the Federal Aviation Administration, you will see that this court in particular does a lot of air court cases.

Oral argument — United States v. Sterling Centrecorp Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 25, 2019

It's not related to this particular decision to hook some homes up to a pipeline to provide clean public water. … So the mine was allowed to continue operating for some period of time after the order was issued, not until it's specifically applied to it is it canceled.

Oral argument — United States v. Lance Stoddard

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 3, 2009

He didn't admit that I knew within this period of time that the guns were in there. … There were some matcher striker plates and then went on to say that the hazmat people had to come in to clean the mess up.

Oral argument — United States v. Ceja-Lopez

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 13, 2004

I believe, because there were no objections to it, it has to be a plain air standard. … He committed a substantial step, and that's the Leo Smaldonado decision of this Court, that the act of crossing the borders is a substantial step toward the completion of the offense.

Oral argument — Ninth Inning Inc. v. National Football League, Inc

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 9, 2026

And so I think he acted well within his discretion in excluding Dr. Rasher, and I'm happy to talk about Dr. … I would say that's an abuse of discretion, and I would say he acted well within the abuse of discretion.