Documents

Oral argument — People v. Nelson

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 25, 2020

So from, you know, unforeseeable from Nelson's act. Is there anything you want to say about the judge's comments? Yes, of course. … The diaper was clean, no neglect, perfectly clothed. She was using the leg braces correctly.

Oral argument — Commonwealth Edison Co. v. Munizzo

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 5, 2012

Now, comments cited Waterford Executive Group v. … Comment solution to this problem would say, just file the claim sooner. Seek adequate time to seek leave of court to file the motion.

Oral argument — Keiser-Long v. Owens

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 28, 2015

I'm airing a case 30 years ago in Cook County at 26th Street. There was a case where some guys jumped the fellow at the CHA in the south side and beat him up. It was a fairly simple mugging. … If they've got key individuals, they take out insurance policies to protect them from lost income so they can weather the storm during those periods. They didn't do that here.

Oral argument — Newport Township Road District v. Pavelich

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 30, 2012

He couldn't clean the debris from the road because he had no money to pay his employees. He had vendors who would no longer do business with him. … Then how are we supposed to review something that he was not required nor did comment on? Because he failed to look at it.

Oral argument — People v. Gough

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 25, 2016

On the other hand, we are not here today saying to the court, here's a ten and a half year period of time for you to look at, and if you look at all that period of time, the period of time attributable … Gamzee's report, and the only period that we've included as saying that it's a delay that weighs against the state is the period between the date that Dr.

Oral argument — Matros v. Workers' Compensation Comm'n

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 29, 2013

But that means that violations of the act that are short of the termination are still covered by the act. So he has a right to delect that remedy, that their reaction to his injury. … What about the period of time where he's claiming that he's working on these feeder maps but he's on the floor of the truck examining these apparently for over an hour at a time?

Oral argument — Loucks v. Red Dot Construction

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 6, 2015

Clair County he said I remember back in the 90s my dad did some crane work back when my dad was alive we did some crane work out in Scott Air Force Base I know that I buy a part for my back home from a … where are you coming up with that and every time we try to ask you where you're coming up with it it gets more and more confusing because either you're the the president is reckless in the way that he's acting

Oral argument — In re Estate of Gaudio

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 24, 2018

that she had taken any action To say that it may not have been a finding in the order But I believe when the parties were arguing this and the argument was made that wasn't timely that the trial court commented … there can make an objective determination what to do in this case, okay, let me stop you there Didn't Earl before he died Take the position that he didn't owe your client The money that your clients clean

Oral argument — G.K Development, Inc. v. Iowa Malls Financing Corp.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 5, 2013

In the Third Amendment to the Real Estate Act. That's after the fact, though, really. No, no, no, Your Honor. … Well, one, we took a great risk to go forward with this with Hy-Vee up in the air, and we thought we had negotiated a resolution to that.

Oral argument — People v. Skillom

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 11, 2017

Period, period, period. This Honorable Appellate Court for the second judicial hearing is now open to the Court of Judgment. The Honorable Dr. Dick Clark. Your Honor, please be seated. … Sloan walked out of that door on August 6th going back to the cell thinking, okay, I'm being class-act sentenced. I don't think that was clear.

Oral argument — Heck v. Estate of Thomas J. Heck, Jr.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 26, 2019

But as the comment indicates, when you make your demand 29 years after the note was made, and it's a family issue, it creates issues of fact that almost can never be resolved after that period of time. … Urban, which is not an Illinois case, but follows up on that comment 2. And cites comment 2 in the context of a family dispute.

Oral argument — People v. Hampton

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 11, 2024

So, it is true that the Armed Provisional Criminal Statute is silent on mental state, but the Possession as a Voluntary Act Statute states that possession is a voluntary act if the offender knowingly procured … If a person is acting with intent, they are acting with knowledge.

Oral argument — People v. Wilson

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 4, 2017

And so, the third reason that the court aired here is that it found that no one knew what would have happened inside the car besides the defendant and Williams. … Talking about the fact that defendant acted in self-defense.

Oral argument — Mahoney v. The Evergreen Park Police Pension Board

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 19, 2013

Well, let's talk about the covered act. … So I would ask you to comment on that. I don't think it's a material discrepancy. I think it's tangential at best.

Oral argument — People v. Russell

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 7, 2011

, who is acting as an arm of the state. … of July 7 of 2007 to August 23 of 2007, a period of 48 days.

Oral argument — People v. Floyd

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 15, 2014

This is a 911 report of a domestic violence incident with several statements that suggested that she was either paid or forced to perform sex acts. … If you shoot a gun at a target at some distance, the bullet will hit the target twice accurately because the bullet goes up in the air and comes back down.

Oral argument — In re Marriage of Eastburg

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 7, 2016

So it would be for the pay period, for the over-withholding for the periods in October and November, I guess half of October, November and December. … And Section 510 of the Dissolution of Marriage Act says explicitly, no. And for the 21 years I've been practicing, it has said, no.

Oral argument — Higgins v. Harrison

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 18, 2013

Counsel, what about Judge Flannel's comments regarding the contract under which your client acted as the manager, that had this penalty, substantial penalty, that would have to be paid to him if the contract … The court did act on it, but it was kind of stop and go during that time period. During 2012 were the defendants appearing pro se? For certain periods of time, yes, they were. Mr.

Oral argument — In re Marriage of Cozadd

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 4, 2017

When Judge Gomrich made her comments from the bench, it was in the form of a ruling. Yes. … The judge even commented that that was certainly something that she considered.

Oral argument — In re Estate of Ness

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 5, 2013

However, where was their agreement that they were obligated to pay him for the 20-year period? … If they thought that they needed or expected to continue receiving $1,000 payments while all this was up in the air, they could have done that.