Documents

Oral argument — USAv.Quality Formulation Laboratories Inc,etal

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 10, 2013

And it matters so much because this is not a case in which there was overwhelming evidence of acts. … And it was about him that this disgusting comment comes in. Mr. Advanti testified that there was no third-party agreement, that this was actually a lease arrangement.

Oral argument — United States v. Aduru

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 7, 2026

It looks clean to us. How do you respond? So when looking at the record, we are not only looking at Mr. Aduru's abilities, but we also need to look at his difficulty with English. … And there's a protective mechanism built into the Court Interpreters Act for this exact reason.

Oral argument — Ashley Gagerv.Dell Financial Services,LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 13, 2013

But I have to ‑‑ I don't like using air quotes, but I have to use air quotes around prior express consent. Dell never told her they would use an auto dialer. … And that was my use of the air quotes. From the language of the Act and the regulation, the 641200, it's deemed prior express consent.

Oral argument — Rivera v. LT Redfern Etal

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 7, 2024

Rivera, particularly in the open-air cage, because, you know, they all themselves wore gas masks. … Rivera would be entitled to the inference that, you know, it was early on in that time period.

Oral argument — Noramco LLC v. Dishman USA,INC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 12, 2024

Second, NARAMCO acted at all times consistent with its obligations under the supply agreement. … And so NARAMCO is acting consistent with its contractual obligations to use reasonable efforts. Okay. So we've got this issue about how to construe these papers.

Oral argument — Buttv.United Brotherhoodof Carpenters

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 11, 2013

But when the slate is clean and there's no injury or no other being out of work, let's take 07, there were significantly fewer hours worked. … I'll get to the specific comment.

Oral argument — Minard Run Oil Companyv.United States Forest Service

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 31, 2011

No, no, no. 70% of the projects in the five-year period. Oh, 70% of all the projects in a five-year period. Yes, Your Honor. … Water Act, under the Pennsylvania Clean Streams Law, and the issues regarding erosion, which are several years old, are matters of individual enforcement of that separate state regulatory system.

Oral argument — United States v. Bailey-Snyder

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 7, 2019

This is some kind of something short of vouching like speculation or fair comment. … As you said in response to Judge Schricker's question, it's administrable, it's clean, it has the virtue of clarity and predictability. But it's also categorical.

Oral argument — Quinn v. Avco Corp

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 23, 2023

And essentially when you rebuild a part, Continental, they took the Magneto, they cleaned it up, put it to new limits, and sold it in 2002. … So when they rebuild, they're acting in their manufacturing capacity.

Oral argument — PAFedof Sportsmens v. Norton

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 26, 2007

you've got to clean up your mess. … , does not provide the same obligation to the state to clean up every site?

Oral argument — Summerville v. Fuentes

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 19, 2021

Sirleaf raised that he was an alien during that initial 15-period period before the consent search, it seems like, from the record. It's not clear. … It's not 100% clear from Ciano's testimony, but I believe it's happened like after the initial period of...

Oral argument — Johnson v. Smith Kline

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 13, 2013

Well, I'm not sure I followed your initial comment there about you'd have to know people's driving records. … holdings acts.

Oral argument — United States v. Williams

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 24, 2017

And why is his exasperation, frustration, and the comments that you just mentioned, why is that? … Again, I submit that the court needs to look at this overall, the period of time, the increase in aggressive conduct toward Mr.

Oral argument — E&HSteel Corp v. Cpyramid Enter

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2009

Acts look to the federal court case decisions for properly applying their acts as adopted. … The court found that this C-17 hangar project in McGuire Air Force Base, New Jersey, is a structural steel superstructure facility.

Oral argument — Checker Cab v. Uber Tech

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 28, 2017

Well, specifically under comment G, there's a statement that – Correct. And in the comments to the restatement, there's an explicit reference to 874A of the restatement. … It doesn't act to preserve existing causes of action.

Oral argument — USAv. Krasley

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 31, 2022

Can you comment on that? Yeah. I mean, that was a critical issue in the case. … Isn't that for a jury to determine whether his comments are believable or not? Of course.

Oral argument — United States v. Fruit

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 14, 2020

Judge Hardiman articulated, if those as a matter of law are reasonable, then this question about the identity, the name of the cousin, would be permitted under the Constitution pursuant to a terrorist act … But I'll just point the court, in conclusion of my initial argument, to two periods of 45 seconds during that seven and a half minute period when the trooper asked my client and the passenger about their

Oral argument — United States v. Kalb

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 6, 2017

The court said that this was an accidental electrocution during an act of vandalism and that this is not like an act of violence where a fleeing suspect who is armed poses an emerging threat to public … So my only point here is that we're not dealing with a clean slate. Healy, in fact, talks about the flip sides of a single coin.

Oral argument — United States v. Steven Newkirk

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 11, 2026

A reasonable sentence in this case should include, at the least, a non-token period of incarceration. Just some kind of statement. A non-what? Token period of incarceration. Non-token period. … I mean, while on pretrial release and the court commented back on that. The court commented on the fact that if you mess up, your son is gonna pay the price. He talked... Mr.

Oral argument — Governof VI v. Edwards

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2009

Your Honor, my first issue I'd like to deal with is the prosecutor's intentionally improper and contaminated comments to the jury with respect to his comments that I believe were not in evidence. … Not guilty as to the time period for Tatum and Nibbs to testify, number two. Not guilty for time period number three.