Documents

Oral argument — Monroe v. Houston Indep Sch Dist

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 9, 2022

Monroe, from coming on to any HISD facilities for a prescribed period of time. … Do you have any comment on his 28J case? Your Honor, I don't know how the Court feels about 28J practice.

Oral argument — Joseph Montano v. State of Texas

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 2, 2017

Well, this is a case of aggregate theft over a period of three years, which is the allegation. … And so a retrial is basically giving the state a second chance to clean up their case.

Oral argument — Shrimpers v. United States Army Corps

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 31, 2022

In September 2021, the Army Corps issued a Clean Water Act Section 404 permit, allowing construction of an LNG export terminal and pipeline system. … The ground flare sits on a salt flat, which is a kind of special aquatic site that is protected by the Clean Water Act. Can you just, what are ground flares? I'm just curious.

Oral argument — Elwood Lee v. Offshr Logistical & Transports

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 6, 2017

It's really more a comment. Okay. I just often wonder why the more efficient task isn't to go to trial and then it's over and done with. … It's not a Jones Act. But he knew there was a sticky substance on the floor. He's trying to clean it up.

Oral argument — Ava Coleman v. MS Dept of Marine Resources

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 9, 2018

But, I mean, this was an act of the state legislature. It was an act of the state legislature, Your Honor, but, and we're getting You're not suggesting it was directed at Ms. Coleman. … Yes, Your Honor, I am suggesting The passage of the act was directed at Ms. Coleman. No, sir, I'm sorry.

Oral argument — Vazquez v. Blinken

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 2, 2021

So we're riding on a clean slate. We're riding on the statute, Your Honor. That's not my question. I said, so you're saying this panel is riding on a clean slate? … This is an individual who simply filed outside the five-year limitations period in Section 1503A.

Oral argument — Lewis v. Board of Supervisors of LSU

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 6, 2025

It was truly clean-sleuthing. … He came during the Hush Blackwell time period, but he was not there at all during the Les Miles period that was the main subject of . . .

Oral argument — Vine Street LLC v. Keeling

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 3, 2014

Because, Your Honor, they engaged in intentional acts that were designed to dispose of perk. Okay, so so you're accepting the fact that that the act of Norwich had to be an intentional act. … They had that knowledge, and they intended the consequences of that act, of their acts. And when it seeped out, they intended that act. So that leaves me kind of hanging. I don't think so.

Oral argument — United States v. Montemayor

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 3, 2022

So we are on plain air. … In count two of the firearm conspiracy, there is no doubt that this was not a clean charge, not a clean instruction. I assume the pattern jury instructions discriminate between those two, right?

Oral argument — Atchafalaya Basinkeeper v. U.S. Army Corps

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 30, 2018

To the contrary, the 408 EA expressly said that they would be insignificant and that mitigation would be discussed in the 404 EA, the Clean Water Act EA, solely because the Clean Water Act regs do require … So very much the Clean Water Act is designed to protect specific uses.

Oral argument — Entergy Texas, Incorporated v. Donna Nelson

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 6, 2018

And they didn't say subject to this is all going to be up in the air again when we get the final true-up. … For the entire period. For the entire period. And it made its order effective from the beginning of the compliance period, starting June 2007, even though the decision was made in 2015.

Oral argument — United States v. Rodney Hesson

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 4, 2018

Again, I think many of these comments are at or over the line of 704B. … There was — there was this transition period. So there would have been additional proceeds that she presumably would have obtained during that transition period.

Oral argument — Marco Cantu v. Michael Schmidt

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 4, 2015

When it comes up, finish your sentence, put a period at the end if you need more time. … Your Honor, I appreciate exactly where the Court's coming from with that comment.

Oral argument — Clarence Simon, Jr. v. Longnecker Properties, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 5, 2016

They've thrown all the slings in the middle and they require you to get up on the pipe, which is fine if the pipe is perfectly clean. If it's not perfectly clean, you're in big trouble. … So I will touch on the Jones Act and borrowed liability issue.

Oral argument — Katz v. Wormuth

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 8, 2023

The agency employer is either the Air Force, the Army, the HHS, the VA, whatever it is. The EEOC is viewed as the commission. … The younger comment, if you read it in the context, it was clear. There were two actions here.

Oral argument — Occidental Petroleum v. Wells Fargo

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 5, 2024

They would have a right at the end of all benefits running clean. They would. If the benefits were exhausted, the residual would go back to Occidental or to Anadarko at the end. … As this court emphasized in its en banc decision in Little against Liquid Air Corporation, summary judgment is not a disfavored procedural shortcut.

Oral argument — Southwestern Elec Power Co. v. EPA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 3, 2018

And third, for leachate, EPA's decision is arbitrary and capricious because it rests on an interpretation of the Clean Water Act that's been foreclosed by the Supreme Court and by precedent from the circuit … Your Honor, the Clean Water Act amendments that are issued here were passed in 72. The goal was to eliminate all water pollution by 1985.

Oral argument — State of Louisiana v. BP America Production Compan

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 4, 2020

Then they're supposed to actually be at the department holds a hearing, where I guess people can comment on the remediation plan. … So I don't know if you want to comment on, it's that Part C that to me gives the strongest basis, the strongest color, like maybe there is some room for issue.

Oral argument — United States v. Mcneal

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 1, 2024

It had a 60 month sentence in mind Explicitly based upon the 39-year criminal history not related at all to the enhancement With respect to the comments that the Fifth Circuit can't make me rule on The … So I would submit that the 60 months is plucked out of thin air Without any explanation of why it should be six 60 months I would note that Johnson which the government relies on is a plain error case

Oral argument — United States v. American Commercial Lines, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 11, 2017

That comes under the Clean Water Act pre-OPA. … Under that act, the mere existence of the contract was sufficient to defeat the defense under the Clean Water Act.