Documents

Oral argument — U.S. Well Services, LLC v. Stewart

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 4, 2025

Because in our invention, monitoring pressure is the act of actually measuring the pressure in the operating well in the fluid. … Can you comment briefly on the evidence that was submitted on secondary considerations? Sure. The brochures and Sure.

Oral argument — Engineered Corrosion Solutions v. South-Tek Systems, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 7, 2019

That is absolutely an inactive system during that period of time. But with minimal effort every spring, I can reactivate that system. … And the whole, the whole reason for, for having a vent to vent air was to allow the nitrogen to displace the air so you don't create air pockets or air bubbles in the system where corrosion can occur.

Oral argument — Darby Development Company, Inc. v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 7, 2023

The mere presence of migratory birds doesn't make something a water of the United States under the Clean Water Act, and therefore the EPA did not have any statutory authority to prevent the discharge of … That's no different from the Supreme Court saying, you know, you don't have authority under the Clean Water Act, merely because you found migratory birds in the lake bed to prevent a discharge.

Oral argument — Barnick v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 6, 2009

Is there anything that the Air Force stated or otherwise? … And I argue in my brief why it is that that discharge too is illegal and in fact period 4 applies in this case as pointed out in my brief concerning periods 1, 2, 3 and 4. I'm sorry, is my time up?

Oral argument — MACOM Technology Solutions v. Infineon Technologies Americas

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 6, 2017

Clean up his record. Yeah, do it over again. And by the way, we liked what you had to say. … I draw them in the air all the time. I'm not offended by Venn diagrams. We are not at all taking the position that that was created by the parties in 2010.

Oral argument — Monsanto Company v. David

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 3, 2007

I had the same question, and maybe you can comment on it. 295 of the appendix... There's a reference at the top of the page to... … I agree we give clear air deference to fact-findings, but unless I'm missing another piece of evidence in the record, this fact-finding is clearly wrong.

Oral argument — IN RE SAUNDERS

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 8, 2011

As opposed to the existence of grooves, period. Just the concept of grooves in the path. … For aiding combustion by providing air circulation around and along the majority of the periphery. Right.

Oral argument — Martin v. USPS

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 7, 2008

If it was a misunderstanding, there would be no reason why he wouldn't come clean right away. … But there comes a situation where an employee is willing to misrepresent himself over a two-month period, and this was noted in the letter of decision.

Oral argument — Evans v. OOC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 4, 2016

But what we have here is not continuous comments. We have one-time comments, isolated comments that did not rise to the level that anybody complained about. … One of them was for a period of a year that he was commenting about the dating habits of one of the sergeants. And these comments went on and on.

Oral argument — Sieben v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 8, 2014

What we're talking about, if indeed she's eligible for non-disability retirement, sometime this year we're talking about benefits from the Air Force for this three-year period, subject to whatever offset … I think that period of time is the main issue.

Oral argument — Gebhardt v. Air Force

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 8, 2006

The AJ acts for the Board unless the Board acts for itself. And here, the Board acted for itself. So the question is, what has the Board done wrong? Okay. … Because I don't think he had a right to commit deceptive acts, but what he did was not a deceptive act.

Oral argument — Biogen Idec MA, Inc. v. Japanese Foundation for Cancer

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 4, 2015

So there is a very clean line of demarcation. Whether Congress might have done it differently... I'm not seeing that. … Can I just comment very briefly, Your Honor, on this Court's jurisdictional... Yeah, go ahead. Yeah, I think the problem is the basic...

Oral argument — Deere & Company v. AGCO Corp.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 6, 2025

Our argument was the system didn't remove by capture because the paddle wheels hit the seed, they accelerated the seed, and then it was traveling through the air for some period of time. … That the first act is to remove the seed from the seed meter and then a separate act is to then capture said seed between the two wheels?

Oral argument — Parsons Evergreene, LLC v. Secretary of the Air Force

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 1, 2020

Extended the period of performance 126 days that accounted for 126 days associated with structural brick discussion. … The government tries to distinguish a contract disputes act or CDA case we cited, U.S. versus General Electric, 727F, second 1567, by arguing that the Air Force, notice they didn't say AFSVA, did not receive

Oral argument — Hayden v. Air Force

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 8, 2019

Hayden's military service is if they had proceeded further again, within that approximately 30 day period, what would have happened? … What's the authority of the administrative judge to act for the board? Well, the administrative judge is decision becomes final after 30 days, which is then presumed to be the board's decision.

Oral argument — ANSTINE v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 6, 2011

And so in order to have a claim here, you've got to have a claim that the Air Force acted improperly, which is what caused his resignation. … If the Air Force acted improperly in demoting him to the technical sergeant, and that brought him to the end of the period, and he chose to voluntarily retire, that seems to me still involuntary.

Oral argument — Karingten v. DVA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 5, 2025

She felt she wanted to do that, not that she was going to act on that. … Did she work remotely during that period? Did he work remotely during that period? That I don't know. That's not in the record.

Oral argument — Raytheon Company v. Indigo Systems Corporation

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 12, 2018

He's talking about his prior employment before the relevant period at a company called ICC and says, let's talk about that period. Did you have any experience with a sequential vacuum bake? … It's well known that you need to clean it, but not the detail of how they achieved it.

Oral argument — Garco Construction, Inc. v. Secretary of the Army

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 10, 2017

The second factor is if the government's act was a genuine public and general act. … A 911 dispatcher certified on the NCIC will run the contractor names through the NCIC for Wants and Warrants, period.

Oral argument — Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. v. ITC

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 7, 2014

But under both the Administrative Procedure Act, the Commission's rules, and Supreme Court precedent, cross-examination of a witness is a matter of right. So once Dr. … Both parties got it very late in the discovery period. Both parties supplemented. That's why the timing worked out the way it did. But what happened is this.