Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
1.17s
Oral argument — Timofey V v. United States
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 9, 2026
And instead, he provided documents showing that he was only the registrant for a shorter period of time, an intermittent period of time. That's correct. … So we would request that- So you want to remand so that this can be aired? The essence of your argument is here that the district court jumped the gun.
48 min of audioOral argument — Fairhurst v. Hagener
Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 3, 2005
was a waste and a pollutant for purposes of the Clean Water Act, triggering the protective provisions of that Act. … be some Clean Water Act protection in that if it's not done in accordance with the label, the Clean Water Act protections apply.
33 min of audioOral argument — William New v. Domingo Uribe, Jr.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 12, 2013
Clean the gun, it goes off. He did it, no question about it. The other is hotly disputed. He vehemently denies he did it. … That sounds like a jury argument and not an argument for saying that a state court acted unreasonably.
28 min of audioOral argument — University of Illinois Hospital v. Workers' Compensation Comm'n
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 6, 2016
She had periods where it did go away when she was seeing Dr. Iftikhar and she felt better afterwards. … When she had to clean the bathroom, she had to clean the mirrors, floors, sweep and mop, all using her hands.
40 min of audioOral argument · Oral argument · Oct 27, 2020
It is in that her background was clean and his was not. So I think that doesn't prejudice her prejudices him. … So from nine o'clock, in the evening on the 26th, until 10 o'clock, on the morning of the 27th, where there is conceivably at some period in this, at some point in this period of time, they know that they
55 min of audioOral argument — In Re The Procter & Gamble Company
Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 4, 2016
But I want to make a comment about what the consequences of the director's arguments and the board's holding in this case might be. … They have the same dandruff organism put on an agar plate to incubate for a period of time, the same anti-dandruff agent, ZPT, skin is washed with the shampoo, the skin is then placed on the agar plate
20 min of audioOral argument — In Interest of H.C.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 10, 2012
Before I launch into my argument here, I do want to throw one cautionary comment out. … Courts have – the Juvenile Courts Act and the Adoption Act allow for the admission of DCFS reports by way of judicial notice. That's exactly what happened in this case. There was no objection to it.
48 min of audioOral argument — Microf LLC v. Paul Cumbess
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 24, 2020
But my understanding is this is not something the trustee forgot to do or didn't write it down, that you all had actually asked that the trustee take this act, and the trustee made a decision that, no, … And they are more necessary than, let's face it, we're dealing with an air conditioner here.
32 min of audioOral argument — Houston v. Workers' Compensation Commission
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 12, 2011
In that job, he was in charge of cleaning at night, a job that he performed on his own, cleaning the cafeteria, moving tables, cleaning and wiping down tables. … He sees him for a very brief period of time. And then he bases his opinions on incomplete medical records.
28 min of audioOral argument — Airlines for Amer v. Dept of Trans
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 21, 2026
To support the rule, the agency relied on a study about the travel habits of college students that was released months after the close of the comment period. … Although agencies are not required to redo notice and comment, whenever new information comes to light after the comment period, the problem here was that the data from the study did not corroborate other
86 min of audioOral argument — Secretary of Labor v. Knight Hawk Coal, LLC
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 8, 2020
And the typical way you evaluate a mined out area is you see what air is going in and what air is coming out. And that was, as Mr. … They don't go in and it was about an 11 month period from the time they started one of these groups of rooms to the period when they would be seal.
38 min of audioOral argument — People Against Police Violence v. Cityof Pittsburgh
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2009
So you were protected during that period if they tried to put insurance requirements, cost recovery requirements, long waiting periods. That's all covered. … And it's no different than if you look at Pennsylvania versus Delaware Valley, the Supreme Court case where you're dealing with trying to get the state to fix Clean Air Act provisions.
33 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Alejandro Umana
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 28, 2014
Again, assuming that it was air to introduce the statements. … And the district judge specifically commented about the looks on the jurors' faces when that happened.
50 min of audioOral argument — Bullion Monarch Mining, Inc. v. Newmont USA Limited
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 16, 2012
And a Citizens Group filed suit to say you're in violation of the some environmental, I think the Clean Air Act, since day one, starting 25 years ago. The court said that's okay. … It's the expenditures are, A, made over a long period of time, as they were here, $700 million over an 11‑year period. So that's one.
33 min of audioOral argument — Redwood City v. Shell
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 14, 2005
In terms of the compliance with the NCP prong, the Port below made no comment on that. … They didn't get public comment on the various plans. They didn't respond to those public comments.
42 min of audioOral argument — Peter Massaro v. Fairfax County
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 23, 2024
And he told Massaro that he came with a clean slate and that you're still here. It was something that he repeated twice. … If we send up a red flag and say look you try to clean house you're going to have retaliation suits.
48 min of audioOral argument — Loper Bright Enterprises, Inc v. Gina Raimondo
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 4, 2024
Do you know from your review of the record whether this issue of industry payment came up during the notice and comment period? In this rule, it did, yes. … I think many fishermen, and this is evident in the public comment period here, but also if you just read anecdotally on the Internet in another forum, at the fish council meetings, many fishermen do not
127 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Business Recovery Services LLC
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 15, 2012
What is the evidence of the purpose of the Telemarketing Recovery Act? Do we have any legislative history here? … The regulation itself has – the exemption has – itself has an exemption for retail sales of non-durable office or cleaning supplies.
32 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Hunt and Callahan
Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 6, 2015
The first video was made on October 16, 2011, a year and a half into this period of time, including after the period of time that Ms. Eckley was supposedly held captive in a basement. … But again, all they needed is that one overt act, that one overt act to convict.
39 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Thomas Lipar
Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 29, 2016
And we had evidence to support a decision to bring suit and to support the EPA's administrative orders, which are premised on a finding of Clean Water Act jurisdiction. … Yes, and I don't think this case will be the last word on Clean Water Act jurisdiction by any stretch of the imagination. Thank you. You're welcome.
45 min of audio
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.