Documents

Oral argument — In re Marriage of Adams

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 15, 2009

What role do those comments play in our interpretation of the statute? I'm sorry? What role do the comments play in our interpretation of the statute? … No, I think that the committee comments are relevant to the intent.

Oral argument — People v. Velazquez

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 7, 2025

The testimony of one credible victim that suffered multiple acts of penetration when she was under 13 was corroborated by the credible testimony of another witness who also was victimized by similar acts … To regarding not preserving the air. Because this was the judges conduct that we're referring to.

Oral argument — People v. Allen

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 26, 2016

I'm not sure that that was able to be done in this case, mainly because the speedy trial period may very well have been running close to its... What lab was this? … This is simply a case where he was acting as a conduit.

Oral argument — McKinney v. Hobart Brothers Complant

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 18, 2018

What can you point to that shows this sort of friable material in the air? First, that's one point I wanted to make. … I mean, we disclosed, I mean, you don't get asbestos disease from anything other than inhalation of fibers that are in the air.

Oral argument — Dodge v. Grafton Zipline Adventures, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 5, 2015

You know, the platform where the plaintiff was injured is strapped up in a tree about 20 feet in the air, and there's only five or six feet between the end of the platform and the tree. … Plaintiff's counsel also made several comments about, well, we think something malfunctioned here. Something must have gone wrong. Well, that's the whole point of the release.

Oral argument — Kolin v. The City of Cicero

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 19, 2020

Those are the two points that set Assistant Fire Marshal Colin apart from Lieutenants Harvey, Rand, and Pijinski, who are all accused of making inappropriate comments or lewd comments but not directly … But counsel argues that their comments were not sexual. Their comments were not stupid and things like that, as opposed to be upstairs in five minutes and tuck me in.

Oral argument — In re Committment of Gibson

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 24, 2019

Well, what do you think about the comment? Do you think it was error? Your Honor, I think it was a fleeting comment. … So I wanted to talk, since I didn't get to talk about it earlier, about the comments in closing.

Oral argument — People v. Cearlock

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 30, 2010

It comes from the Probate Act. Where in the Probate Act? I don't know specifically. … It has to be provided for by the act. It's not provided for by the act. In 1994, the Illinois Supreme Court carved out a limited exception to this lack of reimbursement.

Oral argument — People v. Wilson

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 4, 2017

And so, the third reason that the court aired here is that it found that no one knew what would have happened inside the car besides the defendant and Williams. … Talking about the fact that defendant acted in self-defense.

Oral argument — Matros v. Workers' Compensation Comm'n

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 29, 2013

But that means that violations of the act that are short of the termination are still covered by the act. So he has a right to delect that remedy, that their reaction to his injury. … What about the period of time where he's claiming that he's working on these feeder maps but he's on the floor of the truck examining these apparently for over an hour at a time?

Oral argument — Q-West Inc. v. Bland

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 7, 2022

If somebody is cut off, they are ejected from our place, period. That's industry standard. It has nothing to do with the manual. And that was raised by Mr. Boho, not me. … Remember, I said it was the duty of the defendant to act reasonably in one of those instructions.

Oral argument — Meyer v. The Workers' Compensation Commission

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 19, 2018

And that is a hazard that the appellate court has specifically found in the past to constitute a hazard that's compensable under the Act. … And that problem continued to get worse over a period of time. So I think this case is actually analogous to CISPRO. I cited that in my brief.

Oral argument — PNC Bank v. Stepney

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 9, 2014

So he certainly was able to air that issue on the date of the hearing. … It's not until the defendant is faced with the act of dismissal that she brings these motions to bring the claims in plaintiff's action.

Oral argument — People v. Yang

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 9, 2013

Period. … They're mine from defense counsel's comments or trial counsel's comments to the court.

Oral argument — 1-19-2196

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 15, 2020

And we would urge this court to affirm because the trial court did not air by granting judgment in favor of GTX and Ms. Santra Sola. Mr. … And lastly, the comment about the plaintiff didn't agree what was in her personnel file.

Oral argument — Heck v. Estate of Thomas J. Heck, Jr.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 26, 2019

But as the comment indicates, when you make your demand 29 years after the note was made, and it's a family issue, it creates issues of fact that almost can never be resolved after that period of time. … Urban, which is not an Illinois case, but follows up on that comment 2. And cites comment 2 in the context of a family dispute.

Oral argument — People v. Rodriguez

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 9, 2018

We weren't appointed until after the six months period time had expired. … It was the issue of indigency and our appointment that was the only thing that was really up in the air.

Oral argument — People v. Clark

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 14, 2016

on that, the court denied the motion to disqualify without comment or argument from either side. … And the trial and, and trial counsel, we, I, I guess we offered the ability for everybody to air and nobody took us up on it.

Oral argument — Strawbridge v. Schafer

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 4, 2015

The court acted properly. There was no genuine issue of material fact in this case. By the end of 2000, there was nothing. We've got this ground. … And I'm reminded of that in listening to counsel today talk about, well, I'm not sure, well, we have these deeds and different legal descriptions and it's still kind of up in the air.

Oral argument — Administrative Commission v. Rhee

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 16, 2012

That's not something he just pulled out of thin air. He looked at the church doctrine. … The first relates to counsel's comments on this lack of authority argument.