Documents

Oral argument — ASARCO v. Celanese Chemical Co.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 8, 2014

Could you address the statute limitation, the three-year statute, the three-year limitation period? … The three parties promised, and this was an enforceable promise by the district court, to clean up the site.

Oral argument — United States v. Douglas McClain, Jr.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 9, 2014

And the consensus theory, which is what the jury accepted, was that these contracts were just a facade and part of ñ created this air of legitimacy. … Had the government commented in such a way, that would have been Griffith error in our view and Griffin error in our view.

Oral argument — Jenny Flores v. William Barr

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 30, 2020

I only have a few comments in response to my opponent's comments. The first is that in terms of modifying the settlement, we do not believe that the district court's order does anything of the kind. … It's based upon the Trafficking Victims Protection Act, which vests children with a right to 240 removal proceedings, which are obviously being circumvented by way of these Title 42 expulsions.

Oral argument — United States v. Labrada-Bustamante

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 4, 2005

There's not even an overt act requirement under 846 conspiracy. Again, Your Honor, I simply thought, no, I don't believe there is, but I would simply fall back. … I agree with the Court's comments first on the issue of the motion to suppress. In that case, we have an initial encounter in the field of the defendant.

Oral argument — M. M. v. County of San Mateo

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 8, 2021

The state law claims were dismissed along with all the others, because if there's no force, there's no Bain Act violation and there's no battery. That's what the judge said. … And she, you know, to go to the other issues that were raised in the course of counsel's presentation, to move to beyond the takedown to the period on the floor.

Oral argument — Gardner v. Martino

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 7, 2008

And that proposed amended complaint alleges the acts that you've just described? Yes, Your Honor. … And it sounds from counsel's comments this morning that they agree that that claim is no longer valid. Post-judgment.

Oral argument — Int'l Bro of Teamsters v. Allegiant Air, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 2, 2015

Air, which was cited in the briefs 24F, 3rd, 1431, there the D.C. … And an additional consideration would be the SEC 10-K filings from Allegiant Air.

Oral argument — Janet Brown v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 16, 2024

The air traffic control expert said that was a typical scenario. … She found that there was, that he acted reasonably, there's no nickel, no breach, and no causation.

Oral argument — Relator, LLC v. iLink Employers Company

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 10, 2025

So there's control person liability under the Securities Act. But this is about—is there—do you have a case that says the False Claims Act— My apologies, Your Honor. … Just briefly to clean up what we were discussing with respect to the $100,000. It's 15 U.S.C.

Oral argument — California Chamber of Commerce v. Rob Bonta

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 12, 2022

applicable here where the district court judge stated at the hearing quote i don't want to go off on a review of scientific evidence here i don't know that there's a point in drawing my attention to specific acts … fryer case that case has been filed already your honor and so it was filed before the injunction was filed in the period when the injunction was stayed by the merit by the motions panels emergency stay

Oral argument — Native Ecosystems Council v. Leanne Marten

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 8, 2017

That's a requirement under the Endangered Species Act. … That is sort of classic definition of arbitrary, when it's just a number that's sort of pulled out of thin air with no scientific basis.

Oral argument — United States v. Mark Avery

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 15, 2025

If the court found that plain air review was the standard, we think it's de novo, however. … The knowledge instruction, essentially, the original instruction was, according to the record, an act is done knowingly if the defendant is aware of the act and does not act or fail to act through ignorance

Oral argument — Nunez v. Dr. Duncan

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 6, 2009

But act as if they don't know what's in the BP-8? No, and I don't believe they didn't act that way. They simply wanted to answer his response because Mr. … He was cleaning the lobby area and the visitor center, which is a prime place, and that's why there's a concern for contraband to be left in that area.

Oral argument — NAAAOM v. Charter Communications, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 9, 2018

You heard what I commented on before. … Yes, of course, any media company can choose the views that it wants to air, but that's not what this case is about.

Oral argument — Bark v. Lisa Northrop

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 2, 2015

But in their comments, they just listed everything that they'd like and say and or, and or, and or. … And I just cannot believe if this is BART's argument, and I'm not sure that it is, that absolutely nothing can be done that even for the shortest period of time causes some decline.

Oral argument — Darren Kossen v. Asian Pacific Airlines

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 14, 2023

I want to hear kind of what happened during that period of time. … Well, the substantial evidence standard is brought to be essentially by the Administrative Procedures Act.

Oral argument — United States v. Hale

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 3, 2003

He gave a false name of Jude Johnson so that when the police ran him, it came back clean. … I think the officer is acting in good faith at that point based upon representations of what appears to be an honest citizen.

Oral argument — Paul Parker v. BNSF Railway Company

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 19, 2025

It's under the Whistleblower Protection Act. It's under the Office of Special Counsel. … In this case, under the FRSA, one of the protected activities is refusing to or refusing to not do like a safety act, and here he refused to stop conducting the air brake test.

Oral argument — Coons v. Secretary of Treasury

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 6, 2003

I believe it's in the fact that he, his doctor ordered him off of work for the period June until August, and he could not work during that period of time. … Off of that job for a temporary period, but that's not evidence that he could not work, period. He couldn't do that job for a limited period of time. Right.

Oral argument — Cohn v. Costco

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 5, 2003

And there's ample evidence in the record of all his efforts to do that, you know, accepting jobs that are essentially demotions, that are cuts in pay, cleaning up boxes. … We agree with Judge Burson's earlier comments about if there's any evidence that supports the verdict, it should be approved.